Tampa Bay Real Estate Blog

70% believe America is not prepared for a natural disaster
May 16th, 2007 1:46 PM
70% believe America is not prepared for a natural disaster

WASHINGTON – May 16, 2007 – America is not prepared for a catastrophic natural disaster, and Congress must take action now. That was the message delivered during the Insurance Availability in Disaster-Prone Areas session at the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) Midyear Legislative Meetings & Trade Expo today.

U.S. Reps. Ron Klein (D-Fla.) and Tim Mahoney (D-Fla.) participated in the session. They were appointed by House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) to develop legislation to address the availability of homeowners insurance in disaster-prone areas.

“There is a role for the federal government to play when our communities are faced with a catastrophic event. Federal legislation to address this issue should assist the private insurance industry in managing risk, protect the rights of homeowners, and provide incentives for homeowners and builders to mitigate risk,” said Mahoney.

“One of the problems consumers face is the increasing cost and decreasing availability of homeowners insurance, which is not a problem limited to one area of the country. For this reason, Congress must act,” said Klein.

New polling data shows voters agree, according to Bill McInturff, co-founder of Public Opinion Strategies. A recently completed catastrophic insurance national survey found that seven out of 10 voters do not believe America is sufficiently prepared to deal with the financial and economic consequences of a major catastrophe and that Congress should take action.

The research also found a strong sense of shared responsibility when it comes to recovering from natural catastrophes. Ninety-five percent of voters believe insurance companies are responsible for the recovery, but approximately eight out of every 10 voters also believe that the federal government, their own state government and individual homeowners should assume some responsibility for recovery efforts.

According to poll results, Realtors and voters were aligned regarding pre-emptive solutions such as strengthening local land use, providing tax deductions and credits, strengthening building codes, providing reduced insurance rates, strengthening infrastructure and requiring homeowners to take safety measures.

NAR believes federal policy that addresses catastrophic natural disasters should protect property owners by ensuring that transparent and comprehensive insurance coverage is available and affordable with premiums that reflect the risk involved, while also acknowledging that people living in high-risk areas must assume personal responsibility for those choices and undertake mitigation measures, including purchasing adequate insurance.

“Natural disasters like hurricanes and earthquakes uproot families and devastate communities, not only with their forces of nature but also with the altered insurance landscape that results in their wake,” said Lawrence Yun, NAR senior economist, who also participated in the session. “When people in high-risk areas cannot obtain or retain homeowners insurance, which is necessary for a mortgage, it can slow redevelopment, depress the local housing market, and prevent residents from buying and owning homes. As America’s leading advocate for homeownership, NAR urges Congress to make natural disaster insurance affordable and available for homeowners and reduce the circumstances under which insurance companies cancel natural disaster policies.”

Realtors are visiting Capitol Hill offices throughout this week to discuss comprehensive natural disaster insurance. More than a dozen legislative bills addressing natural disaster insurance have been introduced in the 110th Congress; but none of the bills takes a comprehensive approach, and NAR has not endorsed any of them. However, Klein and Mahoney expect to introduce legislation by the July 4th congressional recess.

“Many bills are currently floating around Congress, but they are all piecemeal approaches,” said Yun. “If America is going to be truly prepared for a catastrophic natural disaster, a comprehensive approach must be firmly in place.”

© 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
www.SOLDTampaBay.com

Posted by Don Suda on May 16th, 2007 1:46 PMPost a Comment (0)

Trump pulls out of Tampa high-rise project bearing his name
May 31st, 2007 4:29 PM

Trump pulls out of Tampa high-rise project bearing his name

The Associated Press

There will be no Trump Tower in Tampa.

Real estate mogul Donald Trump has pulled out of the $300 million, 52-story Trump Tower condominium project in Tampa, according to a lawsuit filed Friday in U.S. District Court.

Trump said in the lawsuit that developer SimDag owes him more than $1 million in unpaid licensing fees. Trump also said SimDag failed to show it had sold enough condos, valued between $700,000 and $6.2 million, to meet contractual obligations to him. Trump was entitled to half the profits of the sale of 190 condos and a licensing fee of $2.8 million.

Trump has ordered the developers to immediately stop using his name on the project.

The loss of the famous name could end the project.

"We could continue without Trump, but I don't know if we'd even want to, " said Eric Fordin of the Related Group, a Miami developer enlisted by SimDag to revive the project.

The project, billed in January 2005 as one of the tallest and grandest towers on the Gulf of Mexico, has been burdened by financial setbacks, legal troubles and the slump in the housing market. Construction stalled in November and the lot is now empty.

The phone at SimDag's Clearwater corporate office was listed disconnected Wednesday. Phone messages left at the company's Sea Isle City, N.J., office and with a spokesman in Tampa were not immediately returned.

 

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 31st, 2007 4:29 PMPost a Comment (0)

FINDING AFFORDABLE SUBURBS
May 31st, 2007 4:26 PM

FINDING AFFORDABLE SUBURBS

Job prospects are good, the weather’s warm and real estate deals sweet in the suburbs of cities in the South. BusinessWeek Online has taken a look at the most affordable suburbs in the Southern states, and three Florida cities made the top 25: No. 15, Orange Park (11 miles to Jacksonville), median home price of $234,200; No. 21, Valrico (15 miles to Tampa), median home price of $265,000; and No. 24, Weston (11 miles to Fort Lauderdale), median home price of $420,000. Using data compiled by Sperling’s Best Places, BusinessWeek Online lists the most attractive suburbs alphabetically, taking into account cost of living, violent crime, school test scores and median home prices. Its top five Southern suburbs, their nearest large cities, and their median home prices are:

 1. Abilene, Texas (176 miles to Fort Worth): $175,500
 2. Broken Arrow, Okla. (12 miles to Tulsa): $194,900
 3. Cary, N.C. (11 miles to Raleigh): $242,300
 4. Charlottesville, Va. (118 to Washington, D.C.): $304,300
 5. Farragut, Tenn. (17 miles to Knoxville): $224,900

Source: BusinessWeek Online, Maya Roney (05/16/07)
© Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 31st, 2007 4:26 PMPost a Comment (0)

Inflation trumps housing in Fed minds
May 31st, 2007 4:24 PM

Inflation trumps housing in Fed minds

WASHINGTON – May 31, 2007 – Concerns about inflation trumped worries about the slumping housing market last month in the minds of Federal Reserve officials who voted to hold interest rates steady.

While Fed officials said the downturn in housing was turning out to be more severe than expected, worries about inflation continued to dominate the May 9 discussions among Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues, according to minutes of the closed-door discussions released Wednesday.

“Nearly all participants viewed core inflation as remaining uncomfortably high and stressed the importance of further moderation,” the minutes said.

The Fed on May 9 left the federal funds rate unchanged at 5.25 percent. It marked the 7th straight Fed meeting – nearly a year – in which the central bank has held the funds rate steady.

Many economists said the minutes strongly suggest the central bank may be content to keep rates unchanged for the rest of this year.

Financial markets posted strong gains after the minutes were released, reflecting in part investor relief that there were no unpleasant surprises in the discussions among Fed officials.

“It will take a significant event to either tighten or reduce rates and right now there is nothing on the radar screen that might be that catalyst,” said Richard Yamarone, chief economist at Argus Research in New York.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 index climbed to its first record close in more than seven years, rising to 1,530.22, up 12.11 and surpassing the old record of 1,527.46, set March 24,2000, at the peak of the dot-com technology boom. The Dow Jones industrial average also set a record, closing at 13,633.08, up 111.74 points.

Bernanke and his colleagues did express the view in the minutes that the slump in home sales and construction that began last year would last longer than had been expected.

“The correction of the housing sector was likely to continue to weigh heavily on economic activity through most of this year, somewhat longer than previously expected,” the minutes said.

There also were worries that the impact of housing, which has contributed to a significant slowdown in economic growth over the past year, could grow worse if falling house prices began to crimp consumer spending patterns.

“Participants remained concerned that the housing market correction could have a more pronounced impact on consumer spending than currently expected, especially if house prices were to decline significantly,” according to the minutes, which were released three weeks after the Fed meeting, following customary practice.

However, concerns about housing were offset by a more upbeat assessment about the prospects for business investment, leaving Fed policymakers to say that the “downside risks were judged to have diminished slightly.”

Fed officials said they had not changed their view that inflation remained the biggest risk to the economy.

“Most participants continued to expect core inflation to slow gradually, although considerable uncertainty surrounded that judgment and the committee’s predominant concern remained the risk that inflation would fail to moderate as expected,” the minutes stated.

The central bank conducted a two-year campaign to raise rates in an effort to slow the economy enough to keep inflation pressures under control. The Fed’s last change in interest rates occurred in June 2006 when it nudged the funds rate up for a 17th consecutive time to its current level of 5.25 percent, compared to a 46-year low of 1 percent for the funds rate when the rate moves began in 2004.

Many economists believe the Fed could remain on hold for the rest of this year although some say they’re still looking for one or possibly two rate cuts at the end of 2007 if inflation pressures have moderated by that time and the unemployment rate is rising.

On the Net: Federal Reserve: http://www.federalreserve.gov

AP LogoCopyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 31st, 2007 4:24 PMPost a Comment (0)

Florida economist predicts housing ready to recover
May 31st, 2007 4:22 PM

Florida economist predicts housing ready to recover

ORLANDO, Fla. – May 31, 2007 – A top Florida economist has declared the housing slump a done deal. “It will take another 18 months or so before closing volumes reach more normal levels, but the worst is behind us,” says Hank Fishkind.

Fishkind says the turn-around is important to everyone, attributing housing troubles to the recent 75 percent drop in GDP (gross domestic product). The current 1.3 percent rate is down from the historic 4 percent pace, but Fishkind says that dropoff would go away completely when housing simply returns to normal levels.

 “With (the number of home) starts below (the number of) closings, the inventory of new but unsold homes is slowly being absorbed,” says Fishkind. “Sales of existing homes are the best leading indicator for national housing markets. April sales were off sharply, falling below 6 million at an annual rate. At these levels it will take 8.4 months to sell all the homes that are for sale. However, prices remain stable. And the sales levels, while down this month, were up sharply earlier in the year.

“What all of this means, is that we have seen the worst for housing markets,” Fishkind says.

 

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 31st, 2007 4:22 PMPost a Comment (0)

Mild ‘06 hurricane season has some Floridians again unprepared
May 31st, 2007 4:20 PM

Mild ‘06 hurricane season has some Floridians again unprepared

PENSACOLA, Fla. (AP) – May 31, 2007 – After eight hurricanes ripped into the state in 2004 and 2005, many Floridians finally started taking hurricane preparations seriously.

They bought generators, stockpiled nonperishable foods, stored bottled water and medical supplies. Many fortified their homes with hurricane shutters and cut back nearby trees to ensure limbs wouldn’t become whirling missiles in storms.

But public safety officials are worried that an uneventful 2006 season has lulled residents into complacency. That has some counties launching public service campaigns and the state urging Floridians to take the upcoming hurricane season seriously.

“People forget pretty quickly after a disaster,” said Ruben Almaguer, Florida’s deputy emergency management director. “We are always concerned about that sense of complacency that develops.”

State officials recently conducted a training drill based on a Category 5 hurricane hitting the state with another major hurricane approaching, Almaguer said.

“We will be prepared because it’s our job to be prepared,” he said. “I think, even if the forecasters said the there will be no hurricanes because of some anomaly in the moon, sun and Pluto, we will still be prepared.”

But in the aftermath of a major storm, officials will be focused on search and rescue, security and public safety, he said

“We want to make sure people do simple things like stocking up on food, water and making plans for their pets,” he said.

Most Miami-area residents saw what Hurricane Katrina did to New Orleans in 2005 and many lived through Hurricane Andrew in 1992, said Elizabeth Calzadilla-Fiallo, spokeswoman for Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management. Andrew, a Category 5 storm, Andrew damaged or destroyed more than 125,000 homes and left about 250,000 people homeless.

“Those lessons stay with you for a long time,” she said. “We hope the community is not sitting back and saying last year was a breeze.”

Miami-Dade will debut a new hurricane-awareness video this hurricane season that will detail hurricane evacuation zones and survival tips.

Escambia County has a new public awareness campaign titled “The First 72 Are On You.” The goal: To encourage residents to stockpile items needed to survive on their own for the first 72 hours after a major storm. The county was hit by Hurricane Ivan in September 2004 as a Category 3 storm, causing more than $4 billion damage in the state and killing 29 here.

“Pet food, diapers, anything you would need on a long camping trip. A 72-hour supply is usually how long you will need before emergency centers or stores start opening up,” said Janice Kilgore, the county’s emergency management director.

But Jay Lunt, owner of Pensacola-based Folkers Window Company in Pensacola, said his business is down this year. He blames the decline in sales of his hurricane shutters and shatterproof windows on the mild 2006 hurricane season. Fewer homeowners are concerned with storm-proofing their homes, he said.

“Things have stagnated now to pre-Ivan levels. There is no doubt our sales have slowed considerably,” he said.

Pensacola Beach homeowner Eugene Pathe will evacuate if a tropical storm or hurricane heads his way this year.

“Anyone who stays on the beach is a fool,” Pathe said as he swept his driveway on a recent afternoon.

People who have experienced a hurricane will always take them seriously, regardless of the previous hurricane season, said Pathe, who had to rebuild much of his home after Ivan.

“If you want to live on the beach, you have to take the necessary precautions,” he said.

Charlie Schuler, who has lived in a home nearby for the past 23 years, plans to move to a new home 12 miles north of the beach next month – in time for the 2007 hurricane season.

He will rent out his beach property.

“The research shows the seas are rising and the inevitability and the virility of these storms will continue,” Schuler said.

AP Logo© 2007 The Associated Press, Melissa Nelson, Associated Press Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 31st, 2007 4:20 PMPost a Comment (0)

House Speaker rejects property tax plan from Democratic leader
May 30th, 2007 7:06 AM
House Speaker rejects property tax plan from Democratic leader

The pen is mightier than the sword, at least when wielded by Gov. Charlie Crist. Certain real estate items made it through the fiscal year 2007-2008 budget, including new Division of Real Estate positions and proviso language ($400,000). But the residential and commercial wind-loss studies ($1.5 million) as well as funding for the state’s fifth hurricane demonstration house ($750,000 in Manatee County) were vetoed. FAR backed both projects since they could help lead to lower property insurance costs by quantifying the value of mitigation techniques.

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) – May 29, 2007 – House Democratic Leader Dan Gelber’s suggestion that the $459 million in spending Gov. Charlie Crist vetoed from the state budget be used to cut property taxes is unsound, House Speaker Marco Rubio has now said.

“Unfortunately, following your suggestion of using the money saved by the Governor’s vetoes would violate not just a principle of responsible budgeting but also the wishes of the people of Florida as reflected in our state’s constitution,” Rubio, R-West Miami, wrote in a letter dated Friday.

“Given sound budgeting principles and constitutional budget restraints, I encourage you to consider other recurring expenses as an opportunity to reduce property taxes,” Rubio wrote.

Crist on Thursday signed into law a $71.5 billion state budget after vetoing a variety of spending items ranging from local cultural and recreation projects to a 5 percent tuition increase for university and community college students.

The signed budget, though, includes a $545 million increase in the state’s required local property tax for public schools although lawmakers will meet in special session June 12-22 to cut city and county property taxes.

In a letter to House and Senate leaders, Gelber also suggested the Legislature in the special session should reduce the state-required school tax in an amount at least equal to the vetoed spending.

Rubio wrote that he would “invite discussion of a modification of the class size amendment” to lower the cost associated with smaller classes as one solution to help reduce property taxes.

AP LogoCopyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


 


Posted by Don Suda on May 30th, 2007 7:06 AMPost a Comment (0)

Tax ID debate emerges
May 25th, 2007 7:02 AM

Tax ID debate emerges

WASHINGTON – May 24, 2007 – Legislation proposed by Rep. John Doolittle (R-Calif.) would put a stop to the use of Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) from the Internal Revenue Service as a way to obtain mortgages for primary residences. The bill, HR 480, requires all borrowers to provide a social security number. Real estate professionals worry that it could have a huge impact on the housing market.

National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals President and CEO Tim Sandos says the law would prevent undocumented immigrants in the process of obtaining citizenship from achieving homeownership, even if their status has been disclosed to the government. According to the organization, implementing the bill would result in the loss of $44 billion in mortgages.

CityView Chairman and former HUD secretary Henry Cisneros is concerned, meanwhile, that the legislation would put a damper on revitalization efforts in urban communities; and Tampa Bay Builders Association Executive Vice President Joseph Narkiewicz worries about the impact it would have on foreign retirees, inquiring whether “they have to apply for a social security number or maintain dual citizenship to own a primary residence in this country?”

Source: Builder (05/07) Vol. 30, No. 7, P. 51; Zurier, Steve

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 25th, 2007 7:02 AMPost a Comment (0)

Appetite for big houses keeps growing
May 25th, 2007 7:00 AM
Appetite for big houses keeps growing

WASHINGTON (AP) – May 24, 2007 – McMansions are sprouting in the suburbs of Washington and Atlanta, in southern Connecticut and out West in Utah as an appetite for bigger homes in the United States just keeps on growing.

One in five American houses had at least four bedrooms in 2005. That's up from one in six in 1990, despite shrinking families and increasing costs for construction and energy.

Houses with five or more bedrooms were the fastest-growing type in that time, adding to the nation's consumption of resources and reputation for excess.

''In this country, bigger is better,'' said Gopal Ahluwalia, vice president of economic research at the National Association of Home Builders. ''This is true for houses and this is true for automobiles.''

Utah leads the nation with nearly 40 percent of homes having at least four bedrooms, according to a report by the Census Bureau. Demand is high in part because Utah has more people per household (3.07) than any other state.

Evan and Valerie Astle are having a 5,700 square foot (529 sq.-meter) house built in a new subdivision near Ogden because they want more space for their three teenagers. They have been renting a storage unit while living in their old, 2,100-square foot (195 sq.-meter) home.

That won't be a problem in the new house, which has four big bedrooms, 3 1/2 bathrooms and a three-car garage.

''Our kids have more stuff. They need more living space,'' said Valerie Astle, a grade-school teacher. ''Our (old) house was fine when they were small, but we've just outgrown it.''

Among states with the biggest percentage of large homes, Utah was followed by Maryland, Virginia, Colorado and Minnesota. Arkansas had the smallest share, at 12.6 percent.

In much of the U.S., the growth in big houses is fueled by suburban homebuyers seeking luxury, rather than big families needing space, Ahluwalia said.

''They are buying for lifestyle,'' he said.

Nationally, the average household size has shrunk slightly since 1990, to about 2.6 people. Meanwhile, the average new house grew by nearly 400 square feet (37 square meters), to 2,434 square feet (226 sq. meters).

''You cannot sell a new home today with 1 1/2 bathrooms,'' Ahluwalia said. ''Even if only two people are in a house, they still want 2 1/2 to three bathrooms.''

Dale Mattison, a real estate broker in the Washington area, said smaller families are getting creative with all those extra rooms. One option: his and her offices.

Some bedrooms are converted into dens, but many big houses already have those, Mattison said. They also have media rooms, which used to be called TV rooms back when there were fewer electronic devices to choose from.

Homes in the United States are much bigger than they are in other countries, according to figures compiled by the United Nations.

American homes, on average, are nearly twice as large as those in many European countries, including Britain, France and Germany. Only Luxembourg comes close among European nations, with average homes about three-quarters the size of those in the United States.

U.S. homes are also becoming more expensive. The median home value jumped more than 40 percent from 1990 to 2005, to about $167,500 (euro124,166).

Most big homes in the U.S. are going up in the suburbs, contributing to sprawl and congestion, said Vicky Markham, director of the Center for Environment and Population.

The Washington metro area fits the national trend. About a third of all homes in the region, which includes suburbs in Virginia and Maryland, have at least four bedrooms. In the city of Washington, only 12 percent of the homes are that big.

All those big suburban houses require more land, more materials to build and more energy to heat and cool, Markham said

''Excess is a matter of how each person views their own life,'' Markham said. But, she added, ''Each person today is taking up more resources, more land, more energy than generations before.''

On the Net:
Percentage of big homes in each of the nation's large metro areas:
http://wid.ap.org/interactives/homesizes.pdf
Census Bureau: www.census.gov

AP LogoCopyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Stephen Ohlemacher and Paul Foy (Associated Press Writers). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com

Posted by Don Suda on May 25th, 2007 7:00 AMPost a Comment (0)

Growing technology sector boosts housing
May 25th, 2007 6:58 AM
Growing technology sector boosts housing

WASHINGTON – May 24,2007 – The country's high-tech industry added nearly 150,000 new jobs in 2006, according to “Cyberstates 2007,” an annual report detailing trends in high-tech employment and wages.

The report, published by AeA, a trade association representing all segments of the high-tech industry, is based on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The addition of high tech jobs often translates into an influx of well-paid newcomers to an area, according to Matthew Kazmiercak, AeA’s vice president for research – and that means more potential homeowners.

"This is the second year in a row that the tech industry has added jobs," Kazmiercak says. "Not only do these jobs make critical contributions to the U.S. economy, but they pay extremely well." The average tech industry wage is 86 percent more than the average U.S. private sector wage.

In fact, in 48 states the average high-tech wage is at least 50 percent more than the average private sector wage, and in 10 cyberstates this differential is more than 90 percent, observed William T. Archely, president and CEO of AeA.

With the addition of 150,000 jobs, total tech industry employment increased to 5.8 million in 2006. Tech sectors adding the most jobs were:

* Software services, up for the third year in a row, added 88,500 jobs.
* Engineering and tech services added 66,300 jobs, putting employment in the field at an all-time high.
* The semiconductor industry added 10,900 jobs.

Overall, 40 states added tech jobs in 2005, the most recent year that state-by-state data is available. California led the country in net job creation; Florida saw the second-largest gain, adding 10,900 tech jobs. The rate of job growth, at 4 percent, was highest in Florida, followed by Virginia at 3 percent. Virginia has the highest concentration of tech industry workers as a percentage (8.9 percent) of the private sector work force. Leading states by high-tech employment were, in order: California, Texas, New York, Florida and Virginia.

Unemployment rates for tech jobs also remain below other occupations. The unemployment rate for electrical engineers was 1.9 percent and 2.5 percent for computer and math occupations in 2006.

For more information, go to:
http://www.aeanet.org/PressRoom/prjj_cs2007_US1.asp

Source: REALTOR® Magazine Online, Camilla McLaughlin

© 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

Posted by Don Suda on May 25th, 2007 6:58 AMPost a Comment (0)

Nationally New-Home Sales Soar 16 Percent
May 25th, 2007 6:35 AM
New-Home Sales Soar 16 Percent
By JEFF BATER, The Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON (May 24) - New-home sales soared in April, an unexpected surge marking the biggest climb in 14 years, according to a report that showed declining inventories and signaled hope for the long-suffering housing sector.


Sales of single-family homes increased for the first time in four months, rising by 16% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 981,000, the Commerce Department said Thursday. March new-home sales decreased 1.4% to an annual rate to 844,000, a figure revised down from an earlier estimated 858,000. Sales fell 3.8% in February and 13% in January. Year-to-year, new-home sales were 11% lower than the level in April 2006.

The average price of a home last month decreased to $299,100, down from $324,700 in March and $310,300 in April 2006. The median price was $229,100, lower than $257,600 in March and $257,000 in April 2006.

The surge in April sales was a surprise. The median estimate of 25 economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires was a 0.2% increase in April sales to an 860,000 annual rate. It was the biggest increase since 16.4% in April 1993.

Going forward, the subprime mortgage market mess is expected to restrain sales. The Federal Reserve's latest quarterly survey of banks' senior loan officers, conducted in April and released last week, showed lenders tightened standards on subprime and non-traditional mortgages. Analysts expect tighter standards will lower the number of mortgages approved and keep sales depressed.

Regionally last month, new-home sales rose 3.8% in the Northeast, 8.5% in the West, and 28% in the South. Sales fell 4.0% in the Midwest.

There were an estimated 538,000 homes for sale at the end of April, representing a 6.5 months' supply at the current sales rate. In March, an estimated 546,000 were for sale, an 8.1 months' inventory.

An estimated 92,000 homes were actually sold in April, up from 81,000 in March, based on figures not seasonally adjusted.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 25th, 2007 6:35 AMPost a Comment (0)

Tampa Lags In 'Green' Development
May 24th, 2007 7:01 AM

Tampa Lags In 'Green' Development

TAMPA - Sarasota County is at the forefront of the green building movement. Hillsborough County is on board, and Pasco County is catching on.

And Tampa?

Compared with other governments in the region, Tampa's is lagging behind a national and regional trend to offer incentives to developers who build environmentally sensitive buildings.

Some council members wish Tampa were doing more.

"Everybody else is getting with it, and I think we need to," Councilwoman Linda Saul-Sena said.

"Green" buildings feature environmentally sensitive designs. Characteristics include large windows designed to minimize the need for artificial light, native plants that don't need irrigation, light sensors and floors made from recycled tires.

Councilman John Dingfelder said he was at a Chamber of Commerce lunch meeting recently and the topic was green buildings.

"I was embarrassed to say that the city was behind the county on this important environmental issue," he said.

In recent months, the city has taken several environmentally friendly steps. It launched a pilot hybrid vehicle program, for example, and Mayor Pam Iorio last week showed off her new hybrid car, a Key-lime green Toyota Camry. The city also has assembled a "Green Team" to focus on areas such as water conservation and recycling.

The Tampa Museum of Art plans to build a green roof - lush with landscaping - at its new building.

But whereas other governments are offering incentives to developers who build green buildings, Tampa is not.

This month, Dingfelder asked his colleagues on the council to support his motion to ask the council attorney to craft a green development resolution similar to one in Sarasota County. The Sarasota resolution, passed last year, lets the county offer fast-track permitting for developers proposing green buildings, among other incentives.

"It doesn't cost the city any money," Dingfelder said. "As a start, it's the least we can do."

Councilman Charlie Miranda was the first to balk.

"I don't think if I went to an emergency room I would get special treatment because I'm a council member," Miranda said. "You wait like everybody else. I don't believe in preferential treatment."

Council Chairwoman Gwen Miller - who said during her re-election campaign that "green makes you happy, green makes you smile" - questioned the wisdom of fast-tracking permits.

If the city is "moving people ahead and somebody jumps ahead of you, you are going to get angry," Miller said. "They are going to find out, why did that person move up? And everyone can't afford to pay that fee and move up, so we have to streamline to make things move faster."

And Councilman Tom Scott said the city has other priorities.

"Affordable housing should take precedent," Scott said. "Affordable housing is more important. It's affecting your work force."

Miranda later said the city might want to create two lines in the permitting office - one for green building applications, one for more traditional requests.

Rather than ask the city's legal staff to start developing an ordinance, the council will hold a workshop on the issue next month.

'A Better Place To Live And Work'

Concerns about some developers jumping to the head of the line and getting preferential treatment are unfounded, said Paul Radauskas, a building official in Sarasota County.

"That's the whole point of it," Radauskas said. "These buildings are environmentally friendly, healthier, and a better place to live and work. That's why you put them at the front of the line."

Sarasota's private developers have completed at least 20 green houses in the year since the incentive program began, and an additional 1,300 are planned. Developers also have built about 40,000 square feet of green retail and office space; an additional 300,000 to 400,000 square feet is planned.

"Developers wanted fast-track permitting because that meant money to them," said Nina Powers, an education specialist for Sustainable Sarasota, the county department involved in environmental initiatives.

Sarasota County requires all new county buildings to be built using green practices. Sarasota also offers developers incentives to build green, such as expedited permitting and a $1,000 rebate in permitting fees, Powers said.

Sarasota has found that green homes cost about 1 percent more to build than a traditional home. Commercial buildings cost 3 percent to 7 percent more. The energy and water bill savings come in four to seven years.

Hillsborough County this month instituted a policy to encourage residential developers to build green: Building plan reviews will be completed in five working days or less. That compares with three or four weeks without the expedited review, said Mike Allgire, Hillsborough's manager of permit intake and processing.

A task force is looking at creating more incentives, such as reduced parking requirements or increased density. Commercial permitting also could be expedited.

In Pasco County, officials met for four hours this month with representatives from the Gulf Coast chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council in an effort to get moving on green initiatives.

Tampa plans to give developers building in the Channel District the option of asking for a density bonus if they build green.

That provision, however, has not been adopted in a formal code.

State May Mandate Green Growth

In Sarasota County, the North Sarasota Public Library and the Twin Lakes Park Green Office Complex are examples of new green buildings.

They highlight features such as low-flow toilets and low-hanging lights. Lights dim or brighten depending on how much natural sunlight is filtering into the room. Pervious sidewalks and parking lots reduce run-off to better manage stormwater. Carpet and tile are made from recycled material.

If Gov. Charlie Crist signs the energy bill passed by the Legislature this year, all governments will be forced to build green buildings, beginning in July 2008.

In Tampa, Saul-Sena, the council's most gung-ho environmentalist, said she is optimistic that the city will catch on to the green building concept.

"It's going to happen," Saul-Sena said. "If the county can do it, the city can do it."

Reporter Ellen Gedalius can be reached at (813) 259-7679 or egedalius@tampatrib.com.


Posted by Don Suda on May 24th, 2007 7:01 AMPost a Comment (0)

DO-IT-YOURSELF MOLD TESTS
May 24th, 2007 7:00 AM
DO-IT-YOURSELF MOLD TESTS

Some do-it-yourself mold test kits are a simple and inexpensive way to uncover a mold problem. But choose carefully, as others are a waste of your money, says mold specialist David C. Straus, a professor of microbiology at Texas Tech University. The simplest and most effective tests, he says, are those that rely on a piece of adhesive to transfer a mold sample to a Petri dish filled with a nourishing growth medium. After the mold grows, the user sends it to a lab where it is identified and evaluated. The lab also provides advice on removal. Cost is about $50. Tests that purport to capture mold from the air are not worth the money, Strauss says, because most homes have a significant amount of mold spores that fly in from the outdoors but don’t grow in the house.

Source: The Wall Street Journal, Laura Johannes (05/22/07)
© Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688


Posted by Don Suda on May 24th, 2007 7:00 AMPost a Comment (0)

Forecasters: Expect busy hurricane season
May 24th, 2007 6:59 AM
Forecasters: Expect busy hurricane season

WASHINGTON – May 23, 2007 – Hurricane forecasters expect more tropical storms in the United States than normal this season, and “it just takes one to make it a bad year,” says Conrad Lautenbacher, head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

National Weather Service forecasters said Tuesday they expect 13 to 17 tropical storms, with seven to 10 becoming hurricanes and three to five in the strong category. NOAA is the parent agency of the weather service.

David Paulison, director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said what keeps him up at night is worry about individual preparedness.

“If we are going to survive these storms, it takes all of us to be ready,” Paulison said, urging that the millions of residents in vulnerable areas prepare their homes for the storms and keep at least three days’ food and supplies on hand.

After the battering by storms Katrina and Rita in 2005, widespread fears arose during last year’s hurricane season that another powerful storm might striking. The unexpected development of the El Nino climate phenomenon helped dampen conditions.

El Nino is a warming of the tropical Pacific Ocean that occurs every few years. The warm water affects wind patterns that guide weather movement, and its effects can be seen worldwide. In El Nino years, there tend to be fewer summer hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean.

El Nino is over now, and conditions could develop that might even encourage more storms, said Bill Proenza, head of the National Hurricane Center.

Earlier this month Philip Klotzbach, a research associate at Colorado State University, and Joe Bastardi, the chief hurricane forecaster for AccuWeather Inc., said they anticipated a more active storm cycle this year.

Almost as if to underscore their comments, a subtropical storm formed off the southeast coast and became Andrea, the first named storm of the year, well before the June 1 official beginning of hurricane season.

Hurricane season ends Nov. 30, but the strange season of 2005 ran over into late December, as well as using up all the planned alphabetical names, forcing storm watchers to switch to the Greek alphabet to continue naming storms.

Last year, there were just 10 tropical storms in the Atlantic and only two made landfall in the United States.

While last year proved quieter than expected, and 2005’s parade of storms caused the weather service to raise its prediction, the number of tropical storms predicted in May was within the expected range in 1999, 2000, 2002 and 2004. The forecast was low in 2001 and 2003.

More important to hurricane forecasters is their ability to predict when and where a particular storm will go, something that has improved steadily in recent years.

On the Net:
National Hurricane Center:
http://www.noaa.gov
Colorado State: http://typhoon.atmos.colostate.edu/

AP LogoCopyright 2007 The Associated Press, Randolph E. Schmid (AP Science Writer). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted by Don Suda on May 24th, 2007 6:59 AMPost a Comment (0)

Quick-pay mortgage system isn’t for all
May 24th, 2007 6:56 AM
Quick-pay mortgage system isn’t for all

MIAMI – May 22, 2007 – Juan Hernandez said he’ll pay off the 30-year mortgage on his Miami house in less than five years and save about $589,000 in interest. Miami Lakes resident Karyann Padron plans to pay her home loan in 15 years or less. Her estimated savings on interest: $150,000.

Both said they’ll slash their repayment period by using software that vows homeowners can repay 30-year mortgages in eight to 11 years without changing their lifestyles or refinancing.

Mortgage accelerator systems trickled into the United States within the last few years, and they may sound golden to South Florida homeowners strapped with big mortgages and high taxes. But analysts say these programs aren’t for everybody. Some systems require borrowing from a line of credit, which may add to debt if homeowners can’t budget. The plans generally are not cheap, which might make a homeowner wonder if they can’t calculate payments on their own.

Hernandez closed on his Miami house in December 2004. After refinancing seven months later, he had a $405,000 mortgage. He discovered the Money Merge Account through his mortgage broker, around the same time he received a $50,000 line of credit for a backyard pool. He studied the program, canceled his pool plans and applied the line of credit to his mortgage account.

He estimated his mortgage would cost $750,000 with interest. That’s changed, he said.

“It’s a solution,” added Hernandez, 34, director of sales at STS Telecom. “In 4.7 years, I’m paying off the house, the line of credit and our debt.”

He was so excited about the product, which has a one-time fee of $3,500, that he signed up to sell it. More than 1,500 people in the Miami area have become independent agents for this software, collecting commissions of $900 to $1,575 depending on sales levels, said Skyler Witman, co-founder of United First Financial, the Utah company that developed the software. The company, which launched the product in October, isn’t doing direct marketing or mailings, so independent agents promote the products in their areas. The company said it has 411 customers in the Miami area and about 5,000 nationwide.

How it works

The Money Merge Account requires homeowners to have an existing mortgage and a line of credit with specific features. Homeowners deposit their paychecks into the line of credit account and then pay expenses with the credit line.

The Money Merge Account itself is simply software that interacts with the line of credit and mortgage. It functions as a virtual financial planner, telling the user when and how much to pay toward the mortgage. Combining the income and the line of credit, it’s set to pay off the principal at a quicker rate. Meanwhile, leftover income in the line of credit pays down that credit balance.

“It’s not like you’re trading one debt for another,” said Padron, 28, a teacher who is using the system to pay her $149,000 mortgage.

The company’s founders said homeowners with discipline and knowledge of the mortgage system could try to do this on their own. But, they added, many variables influence the calculations and amounts to transfer. The Money Merge Account’s prompts are simple, and the money works more effectively than sitting in a bank account, said John Washenko, co-founder of the Money Merge Account.

Potential problems

The software requires some discipline. Users must diligently input all income received and every purchase made. And because the system relies on discretionary income, it’s only best for people who spend less than they earn, said Greg McBride, senior financial analyst for Bankrate.com, a financial website based in North Palm Beach. Extra spending could increase the line of credit balance and delay the payment period.

McBride added that homeowners could better put their money to use in a Roth IRA or education funds, instead of funneling money into a mortgage accelerator.

“Is it better than letting idle money pile up in the checking account? Absolutely,” he said. “But it still takes a back seat to other wealth-building that households should be taking advantage of.”

Similar products started in New Zealand and England and entered the U.S. market within the last three years, McBride said. Another system, Mortgage Accelerator Plus based in California, promises to help pay down the mortgage in seven to nine years using an online calculator and CDs that include financial work sheets. Developer Norm Bour said his product provides customers more education instead of electronic pizzazz and, at $1,295, is cheaper than the United First Financial’s product.

Bour launched his accelerator in 2002 and estimated about 1,000 people use it nationwide.

But Hernandez likes the Money Merge Account’s financial road map.

“I think I’m the only person in Miami who looks forward to their mortgage statements coming in.”

Copyright © 2007 The Miami Herald, Angela Tablac. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Posted by Don Suda on May 24th, 2007 6:56 AMPost a Comment (0)

Buyers were unaware of Lake home’s violent past
May 24th, 2007 6:52 AM
Buyers were unaware of Lake home’s violent past

CASSIA – May 22, 2007 – The three-bedroom, two-bathroom house in rural Lake County offered everything Christina Johnson and her parents were looking for, including a pool and land for a horse.

But on May 1, the day the family began moving in, they learned a more unsettling feature of the house in the Royal Trails subdivision. It had been the scene of one of Lake County’s most notorious crimes: a triple murder and suicide that rocked the Eustis Police Department.

“There was no way we could ever stay here,” said Johnson, standing in the master bedroom where three of the four died. “It would be like living in a morgue.”

Though the slayings by Eustis police Cpl. Michael Mount received substantial media coverage in Central Florida, the Palm Coast family hadn’t heard about the Feb. 5, 2006, tragedy until a new neighbor casually mentioned it.

They think the realty company should have told them.

Johnson, 24, and her parents, John and Kathy Johnson, are stuck with the $227,000 ranch house where the jealous police officer shot his estranged wife, Kim; fellow officer Joe Gomez; and Gomez’ wife, Serena, before turning the gun on himself.

Brokers at Beard Pippin Properties Inc., were silent because Florida law allows them to be.

The 2003 law, introduced by state Sen. Bill Posey, a Rockledge Republican and Realtor, says: “[t]he fact that a property was, or was at any time suspected to have been, the site of a homicide, suicide, or death is not a material fact that must be disclosed in a real estate transaction.”

Most states require home sellers and real-estate agents to disclose known defects that could diminish the value of a house, but not past tragedies that may stigmatize the property.

The National Association of Realtors’ code of ethics requires its members to reveal all material factors that may affect the desirability of a property, “but psychological factors are a gray area,” said Walt Molony, a spokesman.

“Personally, if it was me, if I was a person of faith, I would have somebody come and bless the place,” he said. “I’m serious.”

Homes rumored to be haunted or tainted by murder, suicide and other scandals take longer to sell and fetch prices slightly under market value, according to a study of 102 stigmatized homes by James Larsen, a finance professor at Wright State University in Ohio.

“Some stuff creeps people out,” Larsen said in a telephone interview.

The three-bedroom house on Telford Lane in Deltona, where six friends were bludgeoned to death Aug. 6, 2004, sold nine months later for $112,000, about $70,000 under market value.

Real-estate broker Kimberly Haney said she couldn’t keep its history a secret. The massacre made international news.

Though most customers had heard of the killings, some were unaware of the crime’s precise venue until she told them. Some immediately lost interest in the bargain-priced property.

“I didn’t get any heebie-jeebie feeling when I went into the Telford house. There was no evidence of any crime there,” said Haney, who now works for Prudential Properties in Orange City. “But ethically, anything that would affect the person moving in, I kind of want to tell them about it. I kind of go to extremes. I . . . [point out] pedophiles in a neighborhood. . . . I want my customers to come back because they’re very happy.”

The buyer of the Deltona home, Dayna Gardner, fixed it up and leases it. She said she has had two tenants, both of whom knew what happened there and who pay market-value rent.

While Florida’s law allows brokers to be mum, South Dakota requires sellers to disclose if a homicide has been committed recently on the property and Georgia requires sellers to answer a prospective buyer’s query truthfully.

Posey said Florida’s law was drafted to protect brokers who are unaware of a home’s dark secrets.

“Is it good sense and common decency, if you know something like that happened recently, that you tell the people about it?” he asked. “Yes. But should you be held liable if a woman cooked her baby in a house three generations ago and you had no way of knowing about that?”

Though the house the Johnsons purchased on Greenbrier Street carries no visible scars – a pair of bullet holes in the ceiling were repaired – the family can’t push the tragedy from their minds.

Where they had once envisioned a new horse roaming, they now imagine Mount lurking.

The lease on their condominium in Flagler County expires May 31, but the family vows they will not sleep in Joe and Serena Gomez’s former house, where many of their new neighbors are law-enforcement officers. Rather than move in, they buried a statue of St. Joseph in the yard, a Catholic tradition that purports to speed the sale of real estate.

John Johnson, worried that his family can’t afford a mortgage for a house they aren’t living in, said he has tried to convince his wife and daughter that the house wasn’t responsible for the murders. He asked them to consider that four others who were sleeping in the home that night survived the shooting, including three children.

His wife is a retired nurse; his daughter, a third-year college student, works at a restaurant.

“There’s no changing their minds,” said Johnson, a truck driver.

Larry Beard, whose real-estate firm listed the home, said the seller, Debra James, who is Serena Gomez’s mother, had instructed his agents not to volunteer information about the tragedy.

James, who escaped the shooting by fleeing the home with her 6-year-old grandson Justin, refuted that claim in a phone interview from her home in West Palm Beach.

She said Tavares lawyer William Cauthen, who handled her daughter and son-in-law’s estates, recommended full disclosure but she deferred to the real-estate agents, suggesting they use their discretion.

“I’m trying to raise a little boy who lost both his parents,” she said. “I just wanted the house gone.”

James said the Johnsons got a bargain -- she originally listed the 1,552-square-foot home for $275,000 -- and said their fears are unreasonable.

“The house had nothing to do with Michael Mount and what he did,” she said.

Beard, who has offered to waive his firm’s commission fees and resell the home for the Johnsons, insisted his sales associates did not have permission to discuss the tragedy with prospective buyers.

If a customer had asked, he said, his employees were to read a lawyer-drafted statement that was “very specific and to the point. It tells you everything.” The Johnsons did not inquire.

Kathy Johnson said she never thought to ask, “Has there ever been a triple murder-suicide here?”

“But,” she added, “You can bet, the next time, we will.”

Stephen Hudak can be reached at shudak@orlandosentinel.com or 352-742-5930.

Copyright © 200, The Orlando Sentinel, Fla., Stephen Hudak. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.


Posted by Don Suda on May 24th, 2007 6:52 AMPost a Comment (0)

Mortgage bill may lose Bush support
May 24th, 2007 6:49 AM
Mortgage bill may lose Bush support

WASHINGTON – May 22, 2007 – Legislation to tighten federal oversight of the two biggest buyers of home mortgages, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has strong backing in the House but could lose the Bush administration’s support because of a new provision trimming the authority of federal regulators.

The bill is the product of an earlier compromise between majority Democrats in the House and the Bush administration. It also has attracted support from a number of House Republicans.

The multibillion-dollar accounting scandals that roiled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in recent years brought demands for tighter government supervision and cuts in their massive mortgage holdings, now worth a combined $1.5 trillion.

The House was scheduled to vote Tuesday to approve the bill providing for stricter federal supervision of the two government-sponsored companies, which together finance or guarantee more than three-quarters of U.S. home mortgages.

But in House action last Thursday, the bill was reshaped in a way that lessens the power of the new federal regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over their mortgage holdings, compared with an earlier version that moved through the House. A bipartisan amendment adopted by voice vote puts some restrictions on that authority.

The Bush administration has insisted that the new regulator have the discretion and authority to reduce the companies’ mortgage portfolios. White House support is considered crucial to the bill’s prospects in the Senate and for eventual congressional passage, following years of failed efforts to enact such legislation.

In Thursday’s debate, a partisan split was evident over the bill’s provision creating a housing aid fund to be financed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

An estimated $500 million to $600 million a year from the companies’ profits would go to the five-year fund, which would be used to build and rehabilitate housing for low-income people. In the first year, the money would go for housing for victims of hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Diverting company profits to the housing fund would impose a “mortgage tax” on every home loan financed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Republicans said, thereby making middle-class homeowners pay for the fund.

In addition, the White House said it was concerned the fund could be “susceptible to political influences that could compromise the goals of assisting as many low-income families in need as possible.”

Republicans said no money from the fund should go to community groups that run voter registration drives.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were created by Congress to pump money into the mortgage market by buying home loans from banks and other lenders, to keep interest rates low and make home ownership affordable for low- and moderate-income people. They bundle the mortgages into securities for sale on Wall Street.

Information on the bill, H.R. 1427, may be found at
http://thomas.loc.gov

On the Net:
Fannie Mae: http://www.fanniemae.com
Freddie Mac: http://www.freddiemac.com

AP LogoCopyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Marcy Gordon (AP Business Writer). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted by Don Suda on May 24th, 2007 6:49 AMPost a Comment (0)

Staffers lay out pros, cons of property tax relief methods
May 24th, 2007 6:48 AM
Staffers lay out pros, cons of property tax relief methods

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) – May 22, 2007 – One method of property tax relief may be “too rich” for counties with low real estate values, another would disproportionately benefit Florida’s wealthiest homeowners and the third could create inequities among taxpayers from one county to another.

Each of the three approaches that Florida lawmakers are considering also has advantages over the others, legislative staffers Monday told a select House-Senate committee trying to come up with a plan both chambers can accept at a June 12-22 special session.

All three versions, though, have something in common. Each is a percentage-based tax exemption. Lawmakers are in general agreement that’s the way to go after failing to reach consensus on other proposals during their regular session, which ended May 4.

“They’ve all got pros and cons,” said Rep. Dean Cannon, chairman of the select committee. “Right now I don’t think there’s a favorite.”

Senate Majority Leader Dan Webster, R-Winter Garden, was coy when asked if he’s got a favorite.

“Maybe,” Webster said. Asked what it might be, he replied, “Haven’t said.”

Webster has been engaged on the Senate’s behalf in informal talks with Cannon, R-Winter Park, who has led the House tax-cutting efforts.

The percentage-based approach emerged as a potential compromise during the last days of the regular session after negotiations had been suspended because the two chambers had been so far apart.

Lawmakers still are trying to work out the details. The select committee initially is focusing on crafting a percentage-based exemption for homesteads before tackling relief for other real estate including businesses and second homes. It will continue its work June 4.

All homesteads now get a $25,000 exemption. Assessment increases also are limited to 3 percent annually under the existing Save Our Homes Amendment voters approved in 1992.

That has meant low taxes for most homeowners, but it has increased the bills for new and recent home buyers and non-homestead taxpayers. Many homeowners also say they are trapped in their homes because they will lose their Save Our Homes benefits if they move.

Lawmakers believe percentage-based exemptions can make taxes fairer and low enough so they won’t be an obstacle to moving. Staffers cited various percentages and numbers but said they were only examples, not proposals. Also, lawmakers intend to let homeowners keep Save Our Homes benefits in some form if they are better than the new exemption.

The simplest version would be a flat percentage. For example, 50 percent of a home could be exempt regardless of value. While simplicity is a plus, it also would give the biggest tax cuts to the most expensive homes and benefit the fewest taxpayers, said House economist Don Langston.

A tiered approach would let more homeowners benefit but an exemption that might be fair in urban counties could cut taxes too much in financially strapped low-value rural counties.

Here’s how it could work: The first $25,000 of a home might be exempt and then 70 percent of the next $175,000, 40 percent of the next $200,000 and so on. The amounts and percentages could be changed to give more or less benefit to various groups of taxpayers.

The final option is the county-specific approach. It would link a flat or tiered percentage exemption to the local housing market. For example, the exemption might be 50 percent of a county’s median homestead value. That would mean a bigger exemption in a high value county than in one with low property values.

It would protect low-value counties from tax cuts so big they would bankrupt local governments. It could, though, cause inequities – a bigger exemption for one homeowner than another just across the county line although both have homes of equal value.

AP LogoCopyright 2007 The Associated Press, Bill Kaczor, Associated Press Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted by Don Suda on May 24th, 2007 6:48 AMPost a Comment (0)

Federal regulators working with mortgage lenders as they voluntarily refinance risky loans
May 22nd, 2007 3:03 AM
Federal regulators working with mortgage lenders as they voluntarily refinance risky loans

WASHINGTON (AP) – May 21, 2007 – Federal banking regulators are giving lenders more flexibility when they restructure high-interest rate mortgages given to home buyers with poor credit.

The effort by the Office of Thrift Supervision and other agencies is aimed at softening the impact of the housing market’s slowdown and bolsters the argument of lawmakers who say mortgage reforms may not be needed.

While it may also result in accounting charges on quarterly earnings reports of public companies with mortgage lending units later this year, it could limit the economic fallout from the overaggressive mortgage practices of the past few years.

Experts say it could also save lenders money in the long run because it costs less to refinance a loan than to foreclose on a house that might not easily sell.

An OTS spokesman says the agency’s work with lenders is part of normal regulatory oversight, but its willingness to be a bit more lenient comes as home prices and the pace of home sales nationwide are down sharply compared with last year and foreclosures are surging.

Sales of existing homes in the first quarter were running 6.6 percent lower than a year ago, the National Association of Realtors said Tuesday. And research firm RealtyTrac Inc. said mortgage lenders foreclosed on 62 percent more U.S. homes in April than a year ago.

Those are the kinds of national statistics behind American International Group Inc.’s disclosure last week that it took a $128 million charge in the first quarter for higher-priced, or subprime, mortgages issued by a bank it owns.

The New York-based insurer declined to specify whether the charge would refinance loans or cover foreclosure costs. The charge was related to “ongoing discussions” with the OTS about troubled mortgage loans issued by Delaware-based AIG Federal Savings Bank, said Chris Winans, an AIG spokesman.

Banking regulators “are seeking to have lenders assist certain nonprime borrowers to remain in their homes ... Our discussions have centered on that and related issues,” said Winans.

A $128 million charge subtracted from AIG’s $4 billion first-quarter profit is no big deal. However, similar charges could be significant for lenders that get most of their profit from mortgages.

The OTS is talking to other companies about these issues, said Kevin Petrasic, an OTS spokesman. He declined to detail which – or how many – companies are involved. OTS regulates lenders, including subsidiaries of two of the biggest subprime lenders: Washington Mutual Inc. and Countrywide Financial Corp.

“Each situation is really going to be evaluated on its own merits,” said Petrasic, who also declined to comment on AIG’s disclosure. “We are working with other institutions that have big subprime lending programs ... to make sure that they have a handle on their exposure” to loan defaults.

Officials at other federal banking regulatory agencies have publicly encouraged lenders to restructure troubled loans.

Part of the reason federal regulators can’t do more is because their powers are limited on many of the most-troubled loans, says Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Bair cited federal data showing that lenders independent of federal authority originated more than 50 percent of subprime loans in recent years. Those loans were then often bundled into securities and sold to institutional investors.

“No single regulator has authority over a significant portion of this,” explained Bair, who has backed calls for national mortgage lending standards. “The lenders, a lot of them are completely independent of banks.”

Despite the apparent lack of federal oversight, lenders have plenty of incentive to refinance at-risk home loans, experts say.

When it comes to fixing the problem, “I don’t think it’s going to be led by the federal bank regulators,” said Paul Miller, an analyst who follows mortgage lenders for Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co. “It’s going to be led by the market, and people that don’t want to lose money ... it’s them just trying to be practical about the situation.”

For example, the Federal Reserve estimates that it costs a bank $50,000 to foreclose on a home, and houses sold at foreclosure auctions fetch well below appraised values.

There are signs that lenders are taking action on their own to avert a housing market crisis. Seattle-based Washington Mutual Inc. said last month it would refinance up to $2 billion in subprime mortgages to help borrowers avoid default and foreclosure.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two biggest players in the $8 trillion mortgage market, recently committed to buy tens of billions of dollars of high-interest mortgages so that lenders can help strapped borrowers refinance and avoid foreclosure.

Still, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, criticized federal banking regulators in March for failing to keep track as banks and other lenders loosened standards and made riskier housing loans in recent years.

Regulators, however, say they lacked authority over expanding areas of the high-risk mortgage market. A patchwork of federal and state regulatory agencies have jurisdiction in this area, putting many subprime lenders outside of stringent regulation.

In March, the Fed and the other four federal agencies that regulate banks, thrifts and credit unions proposed guidelines that call for caution when lenders make subprime mortgage loans and strict evaluations of a borrower’s ability to repay.

If formally adopted, the guidelines could result in fewer borrowers qualifying for subprime loans. Agencies are evaluating public comments on the proposals and haven’t yet set a date for a decision. The Fed plans to hold a June 14 hearing on ways to curb abusive lending practices.

AP LogoCopyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Alan Zibel (AP Business Writer). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 22nd, 2007 3:03 AMPost a Comment (0)

Foreclosure crisis looms: Lenders warn thousands who fail to make mortgage payments
May 22nd, 2007 3:00 AM
Foreclosure crisis looms: Lenders warn thousands who fail to make mortgage payments

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – May 21, 2007 – The fear of foreclosure has South Floridians on edge.

Thousands of homeowners in Broward and Palm Beach counties can’t make their monthly mortgage payments and are getting sternly worded letters from lenders who threaten to seize their properties and resell them, likely at a loss.

As the housing meltdown continues, analysts predict a surge in foreclosures this year and next that will add to the glut of homes already for sale and further depress property values that have declined since last summer.

“It has the potential to get very ugly,” said David Levin, a housing consultant in Palm Beach County.

Jayne King, of Delray Beach, battled cancer, diabetes and other illnesses during the past few years. Last year, she and her husband fell behind on the monthly payments on their adjustable-rate mortgage, as she was trying to make a dent in her hospital bills and he was out of work after two car accidents only weeks apart.

They filed for bankruptcy, promising to repay as much of their debts as possible. A lawyer worked out a plan with their lender that allowed them to keep their house. “I’m just one of many people caught up in this whole cycle,” said King, 55, a retired teacher and native Floridian.

Across the region, unexpected medical bills, rising homeowner insurance, property taxes and other costs of living have plenty of lower- and middle-income consumers on the verge of losing their homes. But experts mostly blame the trouble on unconventional home loans made to risky borrowers hoping to get into houses and condominiums that shot up in value during the housing boom from 2000 to 2005.

The number of people facing foreclosure has been building since January.

In April, the number of consumers behind on their mortgage payments in Broward County ballooned to 1,135, compared with 248 a year ago, according to Realestat.com, a Plantation research firm. The number of people with late payments also rose sharply in Palm Beach County, from 174 to 814.

Actual foreclosures increased in both counties but at a much smaller clip. Homeowners with late house payments typically are at least three months behind and have been notified that their lenders intend to foreclose. People who secured adjustable loans found out that they couldn’t afford the monthly payments once interest rates rose.

Some of those owners avoided foreclosure by selling the homes or refinancing. When the housing boom last year turned into a bust, it caused a glut of properties to sit on the market, and strapped homeowners couldn’t count on fast sales to bail themselves out of trouble.

Refinancing isn’t as easy now because home values are flat or dropping and lenders are tightening credit standards as more borrowers with weak credit default on home loans.

“A lot of these people, God bless them, weren’t qualified to go into home ownership,” said Lewis Goodkin, a Miami-based housing analyst.

Western suburbs hardest hit

RealtyTrac of Irvine, Calif., reports that late mortgage payments and foreclosures in South Florida this year are most prevalent in the western reaches of Broward and Palm Beach counties. Not coincidentally, those were the areas flush with homes under construction and apartments converted to condos during the past several years.

Many of the people who bought in the western suburbs were short-term investors looking to “flip” properties for quick profits, said Shiela Kiniry, a Fort Lauderdale lender and state director of the Florida Association of Mortgage Brokers. Now they’re stuck with properties they can’t sell and, in some cases, wilting under the strain of paying two mortgages.

“I have to believe a lot of those people wanted to jump on the bandwagon while they still had the chance,” Kiniry said. “It seemed wonderful when they put their money down. Unfortunately, the market’s not the same now.”

Even those not struggling to make house payments should care about what’s happening, analysts say.

Homeowners behind on their mortgage payments typically don’t maintain the properties, which reflects poorly on entire neighborhoods, said Jim Banford, who runs Real Estate Asset Disposition Corp., a West Palm Beach company that sells foreclosed homes for lenders.

Once the lenders take back the properties, they’ll reduce asking prices to compete with the record number of homes already on the market, Banford said. “That weighs down the values of all the surrounding homes,” he said.

Still, many people can avoid foreclosure, experts say.

Felicia Eusebio-Mejia worked two jobs as a registered nurse to afford a house in Miami Gardens last year. She lost her part-time position and fell two months behind on her mortgage payments.

She called Home Financing Center, which allowed her to catch up by temporarily reducing the monthly payment and giving her more time to make up the shortfall.

“I’m back on track now,” Eusebio-Mejia, 40, said recently.

Lenders work out deals

Quickly asking for help is crucial, said Jessica Cecere, head of the Consumer Credit Counseling Service in West Palm Beach. “If you wait, you’re not in a position to bargain,” Cecere said.

Her office is advising more than twice as many people on foreclosure prevention this year than last. Counselors are telling clients that if they contact their lenders within 30 to 60 days of falling behind, they might be able to refinance, stick missed payments on the end of their loans or negotiate other repayment plans.

If that doesn’t work, some lenders are willing to accept short sales in which the homeowners sell the properties for less than they’re worth. As a last resort, deeding the homes back to the lenders avoids the stigma of foreclosure.

Lenders would much rather work out deals than take their properties because the foreclosure process is time-consuming and expensive, Cecere said.

“People should call their lender right away, or call us,” she said. King said many consumers may be too proud or embarrassed to discuss their financial problems. “People don’t like to talk about their finances because they’re private,” she said. “But the more people who talk about it, the more we can work on positive solutions.”

Copyright © 2007 South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Paul Owers. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 22nd, 2007 3:00 AMPost a Comment (0)

Commercial real estate investments expected to remain strong
May 22nd, 2007 2:58 AM
Commercial real estate investments expected to remain strong

WASHINGTON – May 21, 2007 – Respectable job growth, improving fundamentals, favorable interest rates and limited speculative construction suggest strong investor appetite will continue in 2007, according to a commercial market update and forecast presented at the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) Midyear Legislative Meetings & Trade Expo in Washington, D.C., last week.

Investment in commercial real estate rose 11 percent to a record $306.8 billion in investment-grade transactions in 2006, with office buildings leading the way. Institutional investors continue to pour funds into commercial real estate, commercial lending volume is up and delinquencies remain relatively low.

Lawrence Yun, NAR senior economist, said fundamentals have firmed in most sectors. Over the past year, 2 million jobs have been created, and unemployment has been hovering at or below the ‘natural rate’ of about 5 percent, supporting the office sector in particular,” he said. “The office market is the sector of choice, but growing international trade is strengthening the demand for warehouse and distribution facilities.

“With these positive fundamentals and strong spending so far this year, we expect the appetite for commercial investment to remain historically high in 2007,’ Yun said.

U.S. exports have been rising solidly, and business spending for building construction is rising at double-digit rates – boosted by record corporate profits. Much of the new commercial construction currently is build-to-suit, or with a lead tenant.

On the downside, construction costs are rising due to global economic expansion, and pressures on core inflation are worrisome. Retail demand is decelerating and the economy is slowing. “Residential construction has become a drag on the economy, resulting in sub-par economic growth,” Yun said. “Because commercial sectors follow the economy, commercial markets are in a process of normalizing.”

The NAR forecast for major commercial sectors includes analysis of quarterly data for various tracked metro areas. The sectors include the office, industrial, retail and multifamily markets. Torto Wheaton Research and Real Capital Analytics provided metro data.

Office market

A record $71 billion worth of office properties traded hands in the first quarter, with investors focusing on markets like New York, Boston, Los Angeles and Chicago.

Net absorption of office space in 56 markets tracked, including the lease of new space coming on the market as well as space in existing properties, is lagging new completions and is projected at 70 million square feet between the second quarter of 2006 and the second quarter of this year. The total for 2007 will be in the range of 20 to 25 million square feet.

Vacancy rates in most major markets continue to fall, but the overall rate is up nationally. The second quarter office vacancy rate should average 13.6 percent, up from 13.1 percent a year ago, and is expected to range between 13.5 and 14.0 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007. Annual rent growth in the office sector is forecast at 3.0 to 3.5 percent in 2007.

Industrial market

New state-of-the-art facilities are being built, increasing the availability of older structures in some markets. The West and Midwest are the most active for industrial property investment, with overall sales volume running 10 percent higher than the same time last year.

“The inventory-to-sales ratio in the retail sector is low, with a similar situation in wholesale inventory, so there is a need to restock - that means there also is a need for more space,” Yun said. “In addition, orders for durable goods have been rising.”

Net absorption of industrial space in 54 markets tracked is expected to be 197 million square feet between the second quarter of 2006 and the second quarter of this year. The total for 2007 is likely in the range of 75 million to 80 million square feet.

Markets near major ports have the lowest vacancies, including Los Angeles; West Palm Beach, Fla.; and Long Beach, Calif., with vacancy rates of 5.0 percent or less. Industrial vacancy rates nationally are projected to drop to 9.8 percent in the second quarter from 10.3 percent in the same period in 2006, and forecast at 10.0 to 10.5 percent by the end of 2007. Annual rent growth will be 2.0 to 2.5 percent by the end of this year.

Retail market

Decelerating retail sales are lessening the demand for space, and a negative savings rate is worrisome. That is the only sector experiencing significant vacancy rate increases and declining net rental rates. Even so, investment volume rose 22 percent last year as retail portfolios changed hands.

Net absorption of retail space in 54 tracked markets is seen at 22 million square feet between the second quarter of 2006 and the second quarter of this year, while the total for 2007 will probably be in the range of 15 to 20 million square feet. Vacancy rates in the second quarter are estimated at 8.5 percent, up from 8.1 percent a year ago, and should be 7.5 to 8.0 percent by the fourth quarter of 2007. Rents are expected to rise an average of 1.0 to 1.5 percent by the end of the year.

Multifamily market

The apartment rental market – multifamily housing – has benefited from the slowdown in home sales. Planned condo conversions are being returned to rentals, and conversions have essentially ended. Investor interest is waning, with multifamily transactions down 29 percent so far in 2007.

Migration trends are favoring warm-weather, low-tax states, including Florida, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia and North Carolina.

Multifamily net absorption is likely to total 229,000 units in 59 tracked metro areas between the second quarter of 2006 and the second quarter of this year, and total 210,000 to 215,000 in 2007. Vacancy rates are projected to rise to 5.7 percent in the second quarter from 4.6 percent a year ago, and will be in the range of 5.5 to 6.0 percent by the end of the year. Rents are forecast to rise 2.5 to 3.0 percent by the end of 2007.

© FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS


Posted by Don Suda on May 22nd, 2007 2:58 AMPost a Comment (0)

Realtors adapt to changing markets and technologies
May 18th, 2007 6:12 PM
Realtors adapt to changing markets and technologies

WASHINGTON – May 18, 2007 – Although recent housing data indicates a soft landing in the national real estate market, some areas are showing strong growth or the first stages of recovery. Realtors® learned about national and local market conditions and how shifting markets and industry trends may affect their own clients, customers and businesses during an Economic Issues & Residential Real Estate Business Trends forum yesterday, part of the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) Midyear Legislative Meetings & Trade Expo, attended by approximately 10,000 Realtors.

Lawrence Yun, NAR senior economist, emphasized that all real estate is local. “People in the market should be paying less attention to national numbers and headlines and more attention to their local market conditions,” Yun said. “Homeownership remains the best vehicle to accumulate wealth over a long period, and it continues to offer attractive long-term return prospects in many local markets.”

Yun explained that the current national housing correction is being driven largely by investors and speculators leaving the market. According to recent NAR research, the number of homes purchased for investment fell nearly 29 percent in 2006.

“It’s a good time to buy, with interest rates near historic lows and more homes for buyers to choose from in many areas, said Yun. “In addition, rents are forecast to increase in many markets nationally, NAR forecasts that residential rents will rise 2.8 percent in 2007, following a 4.1 percent increase last year which may encourage some current renters to become home buyers.”

Anne Randolph, publisher at LORE Magazine, also spoke to Realtors during the session and said that to attract and serve today’s real estate consumers, Realtors must be able to adapt to shifting market conditions as well as to trends in real estate technology.

“Technology is transforming the Realtor-consumer relationship, and Realtors who are willing to grow, learn and adapt to this changing market will succeed,” Randolph said.

NAR research supports Randolph’s assertions. The 2006 NAR Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers shows that a full 80 percent of recent home buyers used the Internet last year to search for a home. That’s a dramatic increase from only 2 percent in 1995. And rather than displacing real estate agents, the Internet is actually helping connect them with homebuyers. In fact, buyers who use the Internet to search for a home are more likely to use a real estate professional than those who do not.

Randolph also recommended that more Realtors use Web-based transaction management systems, which could help cut down on duplicating information and errors in data management, while streamlining the transaction for their home buyer and seller clients.

“The industry is developing tools for making the real estate transaction smoother, more efficient, and more accurate, and that facilitate timely client communications,” Randolph said. “This is the future of real estate.”

© 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

Posted by Don Suda on May 18th, 2007 6:12 PMPost a Comment (0)

30-year mortgage rates jump to new high
May 18th, 2007 6:10 PM
30-year mortgage rates jump to new high

Mortgage Rate Trend Index

Look for mortgage rates to rise over the next 30 to 45 days, according to mortgage industry experts polled by Bankrate.com this week. A plurality (46 percent) of the panelists predict rates will rise; 23 percent think mortgage rates will fall, and almost 31 percent think rates will remain relatively unchanged.

WASHINGTON (AP) – May 18, 2007 – Rates on 30-year mortgages jumped to the highest level in five weeks as investors expressed disappointment that the Federal Reserve continues to remain worried about inflation threats.

Mortgage giant Freddie Mac reported Thursday that 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.21 percent nationwide this week, up from 6.15 percent last week. It was the highest level for 30-year mortgages since they averaged 6.22 percent the week of April 12.

Rates had either fallen or been unchanged over the previous month as investors grew hopeful that weaker-than-expected economic data might convince the Fed to cut interest rates to bolster the sagging economy.

However, the Fed at its latest meeting on May 9 said that it still viewed the threat of inflation as a greater risk than the possibility that economic growth might slow too much.

Analysts said any increase in mortgage rates was likely to be modest given the current economic environment.

“As long as core inflation continues to trend downward and economic growth remains sub-par, it is unlikely that we will see any big movement in mortgage rates,” said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac's chief economist.

Mortgage rates have been relatively stable since the beginning of the year with the 30-year fluctuating in a narrow range that saw it go as high as 6.34 percent in early February and as low as 6.14 percent for the first two weeks in March.

Freddie Mac said its survey found other type of mortgages showed increases this week.

Rates on 15-year, fixed-rate mortgages, a popular choice for refinancing, rose to 5.92 percent this week, up from 5.87 percent last week.

Five-year adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 5.92 percent this week, up from 5.89 percent last week.

One-year adjustable rate mortgages, which had shown the biggest upward movement last week, were unchanged this week at 5.48 percent.

The mortgage rates do not include add-on fees known as points. Thirty-year and 15-year mortgages both carried a nationwide average fee of 0.4 point. Five-year adjustable-rate mortgages carried a 0.6 point fee and one-year ARMs carried an average fee of 0.7 point.

A year ago, rates on 30-year mortgages stood at 6.60 percent while 15-year mortgages were at 6.20 percent. Five-year adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 6.23 percent and one-year adjustable-rate mortgages were at 5.62 percent.

On the Net:

Freddie Mac: http://www.freddiemac.com

AP LogoCopyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Martin Crutsinger (AP Economics Writer). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 

Posted by Don Suda on May 18th, 2007 6:10 PMPost a Comment (0)

Consumer groups want Crist to veto apartment bill
May 18th, 2007 6:09 PM
Consumer groups want Crist to veto apartment bill

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) – May 18, 2007 – Three consumer and community groups urged Gov. Charlie Crist on Wednesday to veto a bill permitting lease clauses requiring tenants to pay fees equal to two months’ rent if they move out early.

The Florida Public Interest Research Group (FPIRG), ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) and Consumer Federation of the Southeast contend it would allow landlords to collect rents from two tenants for the same space.

“Sometimes people have to leave an apartment because the landlord just won’t make repairs, the complex isn’t safe any more or they may even have to move for a job or military service,” ACORN member Beverly Campbell said in a statement. “It’s just not fair.”

Crist spokesman Thomas Philpot said the governor has not yet received nor taken a position on the bill (HB 1277).

Florida Apartment Association lobbyist Ron Book defended the bill, saying it benefits tenants by requiring only a two-month penalty. Under existing leases they could be liable for even bigger payments if it takes longer to find a new renter.

“It’s a fair bill, a consumer-friendly bill,” Book said. “We removed every bit of ambiguity.”

Book said a change was made to satisfy ACORN during the legislative process but the other two groups never objected.

The two-month provision is negotiable between the tenant and landlord, Book said. He said some landlords had asked for even bigger penalties.

FPIRG spokesman Brad Ashwell said renters, though, often have little choice except to take what landlords demand in tight rental markets.

“Under this legislation, landlords make a windfall,” Ashwell said. “However, a renter receives nothing if the landlord breaches their contract.”

Tenant lawyer Rod Tennyson joined the groups in seeking a veto. He said the bill is “a radical departure from landlord-tenant law in this country.”

AP Logo© 2007 © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted by Don Suda on May 18th, 2007 6:09 PMPost a Comment (0)

Industrial Market Strong in Lakeland
May 17th, 2007 1:11 PM
Industrial Market Strong in Lakeland


LAKELAND
Lakeland is steam rolling the competition when it comes to the industrial real estate market, according to first quarter reports from Cushman & Wakefield, a real estate advisory company with offices in Tampa.

The report was released late last month and shows that vacancy rates for warehouse/distribution and manufacturing space declined significantly with the leasing of several newly completed centers around the city, the report said. Some of those properties, which were complete but vacant at the end of last year, caused the vacancy rates to spike.

But the vacancy rate dropped to 4.2 percent in the first quarter, a decline of 1.7 percent from 5.9 percent in fourth quarter 2006.

The warehouse and distribution centers had the largest decline in vacancy, dropping 2.7 percent from the previous quarter to 4.7 percent. The vacancy rate for manufacturing fell 1 percent to 1.3 percent compared to last quarter totals.

While the report focuses strictly on the Lakeland market, commercial real estate around the county has continued to be hot, despite sharp declines in the residential market.

That's because Polk County sits along the Interstate 4 corridor between Tampa and Orlando. It also helps that land is still relatively cheap in this area, compared to the larger metropolitan cities. But developers are quickly taking notice and prices are becoming more competitive.

The three main areas that have the highest areas of growth line Interstate 4, the Polk Parkway and County Line Road.

Last year was a year for big development in Lakeland. The highlights included:

Southern Wine & Spirits opened the doors to its 653,000-square-foot distribution facility on Old Tampa Highway.

Rooms To Go completed its 220,000-square-foot expansion to the company's Lakeland distribution center on Airport Road.

Home Depot Supply completed a 240,000-square-foot distribution center at FirstPark at Bridgewater.

Coca Cola Enterprises finished its 100,000-square-foot distribution facility at Interstate Business Park on Kathleen Road near Interstate 4.

Layne Atlantic completed construction on its 40,000-square-foot facility off Medulla Road.

The Ruthvens constructed three warehouse projects that measure 104,000 square feet, 80,000 square feet and 75,000 square feet.

This year is also looking good, if not better than 2006, developers say.

RingPower Corp. is building a 150,000-square-foot, build-to-suit, service facility in south Lakeland near the Polk Parkway.

Caterpillar finished building an 80,000-square-foot distribution center at FirstPark at Bridgewater.

Eastern Metal Supply is in the process of constructing a 160,000-square-foot build-to-suit facility on Drane Field Road.

Interstate Commerce Park, by BecKryger Capital Partners, has built a 152,880-square-foot speculative industrial and business facility on South Frontage Road.

And the competition for the space is driving up lease prices.

Leasing increased during fourth quarter 2006 by 88.6 percent to 460,175 square feet, according to the Cushman report. It was also the highest quarterly leasing total recorded within the Lakeland market since Cushman & Wakefield began tracking the market in 2001.

In addition to a substantial increase in total leasing activity, asking rental rates continued to increase, averaging an additional 14 cents per square foot from fourth quarter 2006 to $4.97 per square foot.

As for 2007's second quarter, Cushman & Wakefield predicts the Lakeland industrial market will continue high levels of leasing activity and asking rental rates will continue to increase.

Jeremy Maready can be reached at 863-802-7592 or jeremy.maready@theledger.com.


 

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 17th, 2007 1:11 PMPost a Comment (0)

Crist: Cuts won’t hurt storm response
May 17th, 2007 1:09 PM

Crist: Cuts won’t hurt storm response

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – May 17, 2007 – Gov. Charlie Crist vowed Wednesday that any eventual property-tax relief would not compromise state or county efforts to help Floridians prepare for and respond to hurricanes or other disasters.

“People should not be worried about that,” Crist said during the Governor’s Hurricane Conference, which runs through Friday at the Broward Convention Center in Fort Lauderdale.

“We need to drop property taxes and drop them like a rock, and we will,” Crist said. “But local governments will do what local families do – they will prioritize their spending.”

“The essentials, the priorities, will be funded,” he said during a news conference that preceded his speech to about 3,000 emergency managers, forecasters and others at the conference.

Crist’s comments came as legislators prepared for next month’s special session to seek agreement on tax relief.

Several emergency managers have expressed concern that revenue reductions could cut funding for disaster preparedness and relief operations.

R. David Paulison, director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and a native of South Florida, told the group that his operation is ready to work in partnership with local officials.

At the same time, however, he sought to recruit some of them to fill hundreds of openings in FEMA.

“I need your help,” said Paulison, who still has a house in Davie. “I want you to come work for FEMA, where we’re hiring great people.”

And, as he has in the past, Paulison emphasized that the government cannot help everyone immediately after a disaster and that people need to take responsibility for their own care.

He cited Hurricane Wilma, which provoked thousands of people to line up for food, water and ice within hours of its passage through South Florida in 2005.

“We have got to turn the people of this nation back to helping themselves,” he said, earning an ovation.

Copyright © 2007 The Miami Herald, Martin Merzer. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com

 


Posted by Don Suda on May 17th, 2007 1:09 PMPost a Comment (0)

National insurance fund gains support, but maybe not enough
May 17th, 2007 1:08 PM
National insurance fund gains support, but maybe not enough

WASHINGTON (AP) – Unlike Florida’s Capitol in Tallahassee, where lawmakers have taking a number of actions to address the state’s insurance crisis with arguable results, solutions at the federal level have been hard to come by.

Not long after Hurricane Andrew smashed through South Florida in 1992, causing $16 billion in insured damage, Florida’s representatives in Congress began seeking a national catastrophe insurance fund. The idea has gone nowhere.

“Coming from Tallahassee, where you get so much done, to be in the fifth year of talking about this just is frustrating. Sometimes I swear that Congress holds hearings on watching the grass grow and important issues just kind of slide by,” said Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, who has pushed for the fund since her election in 2002.

This year, though, there is hope the idea may be gaining support. The concept has evolved to the point that it may be more acceptable to states that aren’t disaster prone. And Hurricane Katrina’s devastation on Louisiana and Mississippi, combined with insurance problems in other coastal states, has made people realize disasters aren’t just a Florida problem.

“The devastation of the last couple of hurricanes has changed things,” said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., who chairs the House Financial Services Committee. “The experience has changed a lot of people’s minds.”

The basic idea of a national catastrophe fund is simple. Policyholders around the country would pay into a pool that can help cover losses after a major disaster no matter where it occurs – an earthquake in California, a hurricane striking North Carolina, a tornado in Kansas and so on. A similar fund already covers floods.

Supporters argue that the federal government is already spending billions to help after major disasters, so people nationwide are already paying for catastrophes. The argument against the idea is that property owners in places like Nebraska shouldn’t have to pay more to help homeowners along Florida’s hurricane-prone coast.

Recognizing that some states won’t want to share the risk, Florida representatives working on the idea are crafting language that could exclude states that don’t want to take part.

Frank’s interest in a national catastrophe fund is one of the big reason’s Florida’s congressional delegation is hopeful. For it to go anywhere in the House, the idea needs his support.

Freshmen Florida Reps. Ron Klein and Tim Mahoney, both Democrats from Palm Beach County who serve on the Financial Services Committee, are putting together a catastrophe fund bill at Frank’s request.

“The leadership has given us a positive signal that they think the time has come. In Washington, unlike Tallahassee, when a chairman of a committee such as Financial Services gives you a green light, there’s really a good opportunity for that thing to happen. That hasn’t happened before,” Klein said. “There just hasn’t been any appetite for moving it along.”

But while the idea might get through the House, the Senate and President Bush are another matter. North Dakota and Nebraska have just as many votes as Florida and California in the Senate, and it may take 60 votes to get a measure through because of the filibuster threat.

Edward Lazear, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, testified before a Senate committee that the Bush administration opposes the idea because it would displace the private market and have unintended economic consequences.

Sen. Mel Martinez is among those who don’t believe Congress is going to be able to help any time soon.

“I think Florida needs to deal with this problem and that the answers from Washington are going to be scarce. There’s not a mood in the Congress to do a catastrophic fund because it’s viewed as too isolated a problem to be a national problem,” said Martinez, R-Fla.

Instead, he is pushing for more money to research, forecast and prepare for hurricanes. That’s among several other ideas being considered to help with insurance and hurricane issues.

Florida Reps. Tom Feeney, a Republican, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat, are proposing tax free savings accounts to help homeowners pay for disaster expenses, including insurance deductibles, uninsured losses and flood damage.

“It would encourage people to think about saving ahead of time. It’s rational. It would not cost the federal government much money at all in terms of lost tax receipts and I think there’s bipartisan support for it,” Feeney said.

There are also ideas to have the federal government create incentives for regional catastrophe funds if areas like the Gulf Coast states decided to work together; allow tax free accounts that insurance companies could tap into after catastrophes; and tax credits for property owners who take steps to protect buildings from storm damage.

Sen. Bill Nelson, though, thinks the idea of a national fund can be sold if people will listen. He has proposed setting up a study commission that would make recommendations on insurance issues within three months.

“The idea of this commission is to get all the ideas on the table, approach it in a comprehensive way and then see what you can build consensus on, since there is no consensus. A lot of the senators up here don’t feel like that hurricane is their problem,” said Nelson, D-Fla.

He said the commission could get senators elsewhere to wake up to the fact that everyone pays after a catastrophe.

“A hurricane is going to be their problem, because when the big one hits, at the end of the day, the federal government is going to fund a good portion of the catastrophic loss, just like it has in New Orleans,” Nelson said. “The total bill is something in excess of $200 billion and the federal government has already paid over $100 billion for Katrina.”

But Nelson acknowledges without Bush’s support, it could be more than two years before the fund is considered.

With Bush gone after the 2008 election, Gov. Charlie Crist is pressuring candidates campaigning in Florida to consider the idea. Three of the top Republicans in the race – former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Arizona Sen. John McCain and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney – have all met with Crist and each was asked about the issue.

Now that Florida is set to move its presidential primary to Jan. 29, ahead of nearly every other state, candidates are starting to see the value of supporting the idea. In February, during his first visit to Florida as a candidate, Romney pushed the subject aside, saying “I can’t imagine taking a position of that nature until it’s been thoroughly studied and evaluated.”

But during an April visit to Tallahassee, he brought the subject up repeatedly, telling Crist, House members and senators in separate stops that the idea has merit.

That same political pressure makes Frank think that Bush could change his feelings, too, if he ever received a bill.

“I think the president will be very reluctant to veto a bill when that would just outrage almost all of Florida. It’s one thing to say you’re against it, but when the bill comes to his desk later this year, or next year, I think Florida’s electoral vote will be a very powerful argument,” Frank said.

AP LogoCopyright 2007 The Associated Press, Brendan Farrington, Associated Press Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
www.SOLDTampaBay.com

Posted by Don Suda on May 17th, 2007 1:08 PMPost a Comment (0)

Insurance costs could ripple north
May 17th, 2007 1:07 PM
Insurance costs could ripple north

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – May 17, 2007 – If a major hurricane slams Miami this season, First Coast homeowners will feel more than a rumble in their pocket books.

Recent property insurance legislation aimed at providing Floridians rate relief provides the greatest benefit to households in the highest risk coastal areas, while potentially increasing household premiums in less-risky areas, according to a study released Tuesday.

The report, commissioned by Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, a trade association, also showed renters, motorists and small business owners statewide will pay more for insurance if an average to large storm hits. The independent report, prepared by Milliman Inc., examined the economic impact of several storms, ranging from light to severe.

Legislation, signed into law in January, makes state-run Citizens Property Insurance Corp. a greater threat to the private market, allowing it to offer competitive rates and elbow into more lucrative lines of business like fire and theft policies. The law also attempts to wrangle lower premiums from insurers by offering them cheaper reinsurance, and requires carriers who write auto policies in Florida to also sell homeowners’ coverage in the state if they cover property elsewhere in the country.

In the absence of a hurricane, homeowner premiums in Miami-Dade County are estimated to plummet on average about $1,096 under the new legislation. In comparison, homeowners in Duval can expect, on average, a $36 decline in their premiums, according to the study.

Consumers in the North Florida area – even those on the coast – would be subsidizing costs for South Florida residents should a storm hit, said Joseph Annotti, spokesman with the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.

The reason: If a major storm hit Florida and Citizens was unable to pay its claims, by law, it could levy an assessment on all commercial, residential and auto policyholders statewide.

“Those assessments could last several years,” Annotti said. “It’s not a one-time deal.” The roughly 30 percent of Florida households who rent will not see any rate relief from the legislation, yet could face hikes in their auto and renters insurance premiums in case of a storm, said Jeff Grady, president of the Florida Association of Insurance Agents.

Rents would also likely rise as landlords pass on the assessments levied on the apartment or condo complex to their tenants.

Renters “didn’t get any benefit [from the legislation],” Grady said.

“All they got was higher assessments across [the board.]” The new law is also having unintended consequences on the private insurance carriers – the very market it hopes to revive.

Several carriers have announced plans to scale back coverage in Florida, citing the legislation.

USAA last month said it will “significantly restrict” how many new residential insurance policies it sells in Florida, citing the state’s onerous legislative and regulatory environment. The state’s fourth-largest residential property insurer also said it will drop 27,000 second-home policies in Florida.

The Hartford Financial Services Group is dumping 38,000 residential policies statewide over the next two years, and non-renewing about 24 percent of its commercial business in Florida starting in August 2008. Lansing, Mich.-based Auto-Owners Insurance Co. and Owners Insurance Co. have quit writing new policies in the state.

“The legislation is going to have the effect of expanding Citizens enormously, “ Annotti said. “It doesn’t really do much to expand, or motivate, or regenerate interest in the private market.”

Copyright © 2007 The Florida Times-Union, Jacksonville, Urvaksh Karkaria. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com

Posted by Don Suda on May 17th, 2007 1:07 PMPost a Comment (0)

Florida Legislature may agree on method of property tax reform
May 17th, 2007 1:04 PM
Florida Legislature may agree on method of property tax reform

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 17, 2007 – While a House-Senate committee discussing Florida property values has not reached any conclusions, negotiators said yesterday they’ve tentatively agreed on a method to use – expand existing exemptions, such as homestead, and create new ones for non-homesteaded properties.

The announcement followed an earlier release from House Democrats touting their version of property tax reform, which included larger exemptions. Their version would exempt 50 percent of a home’s value for homesteaded owners. Other property owners could exempt 25 percent of their value for tax purposes up to a maximum of $250,000 for larger commercial properties.

House Republicans had suggested a similar plan earlier, but with more dramatic exempt amounts. Some leading state senators have also expressed support for this type of tax-cutting plan, though all parties still remain far apart in the amount of the exemption. House Speaker Marco Rubio earlier suggested an exemption as high as 80 percent for homesteaded owners, though he was less clear on the amount other owners should enjoy.

A meeting of the joint House-Senate takes place on Monday at 1 p.m. in Tallahassee, one of two interim meetings scheduled before the full Legislature returns for a special session Jun 12-22.

Source: The Orlando Sentinel, May 17, 2007

© 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

www.SOLDTampaBay.com

Posted by Don Suda on May 17th, 2007 1:04 PMPost a Comment (0)

Median home prices in 154 metro areas
May 17th, 2007 8:45 AM
Median home prices in 154 metro areas
 
Metropolitan Area
Q1 2006
Q1 2007
Change
Akron, OH
$104,200
$111,000
6.5%
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
$189,900
$201,800
6.3%
Albuquerque, NM
$171,900
$193,700
12.7%
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ
$233,700
$247,300
5.8%
Amarillo, TX
$108,300
$112,900
4.2%
Anaheim-Santa Ana, CA (Orange Co.)
$712,600
$697,300
-2.1%
Appleton, WI
N/A
$126,600
N/A
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA
$168,400
$170,400
1.2%
Atlantic City, NJ
$251,700
$264,600
5.1%
Austin-Round Rock, TX
$167,200
$176,200
5.4%
Baltimore-Towson, MD
$265,900
$278,800
4.9%
Barnstable Town, MA
$385,600
$372,200
-3.5%
Baton Rouge, LA
$154,400
$169,400
9.7%
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX
$99,400
$115,800
16.5%
Binghamton, NY
$90,100
$98,100
8.9%
Birmingham-Hoover, AL
$163,400
$157,500
-3.6%
Bismarck, ND
$130,900
$149,400
14.1%
Bloomington-Normal, IL
$147,900
$147,200
-0.5%
Boise City-Nampa, ID
N/A
$204,100
N/A
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH
$391,300
$387,400
-1.0%
Boulder, CO
$361,000
$371,400
2.9%
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT
$472,000
$470,900
-0.2%
Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY
$94,500
$91,600
-3.1%
Canton-Massillon, OH
$104,400
$100,600
-3.6%
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL
$267,400
$256,900
-3.9%
Cedar Rapids, IA
$134,600
$129,300
-3.9%
Champaign-Urbana, IL
$133,100
$145,400
9.2%
Charleston-North Charleston, SC
$207,600
$219,500
5.7%
Charleston, WV
$118,800
$115,200
-3.0%
Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC
$174,500
$185,600
6.4%
Chattanooga, TN-GA
$130,200
$129,600
-0.5%
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL
$263,600
$267,300
1.4%
Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN
$137,700
$136,800
-0.7%
Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH
$125,500
$122,900
-2.1%
Colordo Springs, CO
$209,400
$212,300
1.4%
Columbia, SC
$135,900
$142,500
4.9%
Columbus, OH
$141,700
$141,600
-0.1%
Corpus Christi, TX
$126,800
$130,400
2.8%
Cumberland, MD-WV
$85,400
$100,000
17.1%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
$146,400
$145,500
-0.6%
Danville, IL
$52,500
N/A
N/A
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL
$114,400
$107,100
-6.4%
Dayton, OH
$108,700
N/A
N/A
Decatur, IL
$80,000
$76,200
-4.8%
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL
$212,600
$197,000
-7.3%
Denver-Aurora, CO
$244,200
$239,400
-2.0%
Des Moines, IA
$139,600
$144,500
3.5%
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI
$142,400
N/A
N/A
Dover, DE
$200,000
$197,900
-1.1%
Durham, NC
$162,900
$177,300
8.8%
Elmira, NY
$88,500
$75,300
-14.9%
El Paso, TX
$120,000
$124,000
3.3%
Erie, PA
$95,900
$92,500
-3.5%
Eugene-Springfield, OR
$223,600
$236,800
5.9%
Fargo, ND-MN
$133,400
$137,400
3.0%
Farmington, NM
$159,600
$178,800
12.0%
Ft. Wayne, IN
$95,400
$92,400
-3.1%
Gainesville, FL
$210,100
$216,400
3.0%
Gary-Hammond, IN
$122,300
$126,200
3.2%
Glens Falls, NY
$145,800
$151,500
3.9%
Grand Rapids, MI
$133,800
$129,700
-3.1%
Green Bay, WI
$156,900
$145,200
-7.5%
Greensboro-High Point, NC
$143,000
$145,100
1.5%
Greenville, SC
$147,400
$145,700
-1.2%
Gulfport-Biloxi, MS
$132,900
$153,700
15.7%
Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV
$221,500
$209,200
-5.6%
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT
$250,400
$255,000
1.8%
Honolulu, HI
$625,000
$620,000
-0.8%
Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX
$142,300
$147,200
3.4%
Indianapolis, IN
$113,500
$112,500
-0.9%
Jackson, MS
$143,900
$142,000
-1.3%
Jacksonville, FL
$195,600
$197,600
1.0%
Kankakee-Bradley, IL
$123,100
$129,700
5.4%
Kansas City, MO-KS
$150,000
$145,700
-2.9%
Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA
$152,000
$163,300
7.4%
Kingston, NY
$248,900
$248,600
-0.1%
Knoxville, TN
$143,000
$150,000
4.9%
Lansing-E.Lansing, MI
$128,300
$126,700
-1.2%
Las Vegas-Paradise, NV
$318,100
$310,100
-2.5%
Lexington-Fayette,KY
$144,700
$147,400
1.9%
Lincoln, NE
$135,000
$134,400
-0.4%
Little Rock-N. Little Rock, AR
$123,800
$122,500
-1.1%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA
$563,900
$589,900
4.6%
Louisville, KY-IN
$131,100
$133,300
1.7%
Madison, WI
$217,400
$221,000
1.7%
Memphis, TN-MS-AR
$135,900
$135,900
Unch
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL
$377,700
$385,300
2.0%
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI
$214,200
$201,800
-5.8%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
$234,800
$222,500
-5.2%
Mobile, AL
$134,900
$130,400
-3.3%
Montgomery, AL
$137,800
$132,600
-3.8%
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro, TN
$165,300
N/A
N/A
New Haven-Milford, CT
$276,500
$282,200
2.1%
New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA
$175,000
$155,900
-10.9%
New York-North N.J.-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA
$459,000
$463,700
1.0%
New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ
$510,700
$521,400
2.1%
NY: Edison, NJ
$376,400
$363,500
-3.4%
NY: Nassau-Suffolk, NY
$476,100
$479,800
0.8%
NY: Newark-Union, NJ-PA
$405,300
$423,700
4.5%
Norwich-New London, CT
$257,500
N/A
N/A
Ocala, FL
$159,800
$167,900
5.1%
Oklahoma City, OK
$119,900
$134,400
12.1%
Omaha, NE-IA
$133,500
$134,200
0.5%
Orlando, FL
$260,500
$267,000
2.5%
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL
$208,000
$191,300
-8.0%
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL
$163,500
$163,100
-0.2%
Peoria, IL
$103,500
$107,800
4.2%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
$219,700
$222,500
1.3%
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ
$268,300
$262,500
-2.2%
Pittsburgh, PA
$107,700
$109,000
1.2%
Pittsfield, MA
$212,400
$210,800
-0.8%
Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME
$243,200
$234,800
-3.5%
Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA
$266,300
$289,900
8.9%
Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA
$287,100
$286,600
-0.2%
Raleigh-Cary, NC
$199,600
$212,200
6.3%
Reading, PA
$131,700
$141,300
7.3%
Reno-Sparks, NV
$357,500
$325,700
-8.9%
Richmond, VA
$210,200
$223,200
6.2%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
$395,100
$404,400
2.4%
Rochester, NY
$105,700
$106,900
1.1%
Rockford, IL
$114,800
$113,100
-1.5%
Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA
$375,900
$365,500
-2.8%
Saint Louis, MO-IL
$137,200
$134,400
-2.0%
Salem, OR
$191,700
$221,600
15.6%
Salt Lake City, UT
$184,200
$206,900
12.3%
San Antonio, TX
$133,400
$148,300
11.2%
San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA
$607,300
$595,200
-2.0%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
$731,900
$748,100
2.2%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
$755,000
$788,000
4.4%
Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL
$382,900
$337,000
-12.0%
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
$338,600
$380,200
12.3%
Shreveport-Bossier City, LA
$129,200
$129,000
-0.2%
Sioux Falls, SD
$134,000
N/A
N/A
South Bend-Mishawaka, IN
$81,800
$85,600
4.6%
Spartanburg, SC
$124,800
$118,400
-5.1%
Spokane, WA
$172,100
$181,800
5.6%
Springfield, IL
$102,200
$102,900
0.7%
Springfield, MA
$200,800
$207,200
3.2%
Springfield, MO
$130,800
N/A
N/A
Syracuse, NY
$104,400
$107,500
3.0%
Tallahassee, FL
$176,700
$183,800
4.0%
Tampa-St.Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
$207,300
$203,200
-2.0%
Toledo, OH
$103,000
$104,100
1.1%
Topeka, KS
$105,200
$106,300
1.0%
Trenton-Ewing, NJ
$264,900
$283,800
7.1%
Tucson, AZ
$248,600
$242,400
-2.5%
Tulsa, OK
$125,700
$126,200
0.4%
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC
$221,100
$234,200
5.9%
Washington-Arlington-Alexa, DC-VA-MD-WV
$422,800
$427,800
1.2%
Waterloo/Cedar Falls, IA
$109,700
$103,900
-5.3%
Wichita, KS
$103,900
$108,400
4.3%
Worcester, MA
$278,700
$270,800
-2.8%
Yakima, WA
$131,700
$136,100
3.3%
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA
$81,100
$78,300
-3.5%
U.S.
$216,100
$212,300
-1.8%
Northeast
$275,800
$268,900
-2.5%
Midwest
$159,000
$154,600
-2.8%
South
$178,800
$177,800
-0.6%
West
$342,400
$336,200
-1.8%
Source: National Association of Realtors

Posted by Don Suda on May 17th, 2007 8:45 AMPost a Comment (0)

After 2-Year Wait, Ground Is Broken
May 16th, 2007 1:51 PM

After 2-Year Wait, Ground Is Broken

Published: May 16, 2007

RIVERVIEW - When Al Carapella first saw it, the project site was just an ordinary ranch-style house in a big grassy field behind the "for sale" sign.

Across the street was a forest, and not far from that, a dairy farm. Older houses and mobile homes on large lots flanked the site on the east side of Balm-Riverview Road. Even so, Carapella knew Riverview was a hotbed of housing development, and he figured all those families moving in would need more than next-door neighbors.

"You have all these subdivisions being built and developed, and you see that there's a strong need for professional services," Carapella said.

The county agreed to rezone the four-acre site between McMullen and Rhodine roads to allow an office complex. Carapella bought it in January 2005 and put up a sign announcing that Balm Professional Center would be "coming soon."

But getting his site plan approved took nearly two years. Finally, in October, the tractors, bulldozers and mechanical shovels moved in, demolished the house and started preparing the site for construction.

Carapella plans to move his realty and mortgage business from an office on Bloomingdale Avenue in north Riverview to Balm Professional Center in about a month, when the first building is completed.

"I'm following the growth in Riverview," he said. "I think we hit a pretty good central location."

To the north are entrances to such subdivisions as Rivercrest and Creek View. To the south are Panther Trace and Summerfield.

Pediatrician Heather Thole, who opened Wee Care for Kids in a strip center near Summerfield more than two years ago, bought a lot in the complex. A 5,000-square-foot building under construction is expected to become home to her practice this summer, Carapella said.

He said he hopes to develop two other lots for 5,000-square-foot office buildings. A lot at the front of the park is reserved for a customer who wants to build up to 10,000 square feet.

Carapella said a dance studio owner had expressed interest when he was applying for the rezoning. Because of delays in getting construction under way, he lost that potential buyer, but the site remains approved for a similar use, Carapella said.

The buildings will nestle around a large parking area. Access will be from Balm-Riverview Road, Carapella said. He said he decided to name the center for Balm, the community that Balm-Riverview Road links to Riverview.

He estimated that land acquisition and site preparation cost about $900,000. He expects the project to be worth about $6 million when construction is completed.

The complex is Carapella's first large-scale development project, and it hasn't been without challenges.

"The whole slowdown in the economy didn't help," he said. "I got in before everything sort of slowed down."

Carapella has lived in the Valrico area since 1978. Besides owning Hunt Realty Group and H & M Mortgage Co., he operates Bloomingdale Pizza. He and his family have operated other pizza and Italian-style restaurants in the area.

Before entering the real estate business eight years ago, Carapella said he dabbled in construction, including working on a small residential project and a 2,500-square-foot office on Windhorst Road in Brandon.

He hired Fritz Heibel of Brandon to oversee the project. Heibel said he has spent many years working in the Middle East, most recently setting up housing and amenities for soldiers in Iraq.

For information about Balm Professional Center, call (813) 661-7653 or (813) 294-6545 or e-mail acarapella@aol.com.

 

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 16th, 2007 1:51 PMPost a Comment (0)

HOW SHOULD WE GROW?
May 16th, 2007 1:49 PM

HOW SHOULD WE GROW?

Florida will continue to grow, but without adequate planning, what will the state look like? Be part of the solution and attend FAR and Florida Atlantic University’s Catanese Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions’ Smart Growth one-day conference on Friday, June 22, in Tallahassee. Conference speakers will discuss new urbanism in Florida with hands-on examples currently under development in the state’s capital. The conference runs from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Lunch is included in the cost and is co-sponsored by the Tallahassee Board of Realtors. Pre-registration is preferred; the fee is $35 in advance (on or before June 15, 2007). To register, call (800) 669-4327 or go to:
http://www.floridarealtors.org/LegislativeCenter/SmartGrowth and download the full PDF brochure. Still have questions? Call FAR's Office of Public Policy in Tallahassee at (850) 224-1400.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 16th, 2007 1:49 PMPost a Comment (0)

U.S. housing construction posts small rise while industrial production posts large increase
May 16th, 2007 1:48 PM

U.S. housing construction posts small rise while industrial production posts large increase

WASHINGTON (AP) – May 16, 2007 – Construction of new homes in the United States posted a small gain in April but applications for building permits plunged by the largest amount in 17 years, a dramatic sign that the country’s housing industry is still in a steep slump.

The U.S. Commerce Department reported Wednesday that construction of new homes and apartments rose by 2.5 percent in April compared to March, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.528 million units.

Even with the improvement, housing construction is 25.9 percent lower than a year ago. And in a worrisome sign for the future, builders cut their requests for new construction permits by 8.9 percent in April. That was the sharpest drop since a 24 percent fall in February 1990, another period when housing was going through a significant downturn.

In other economic news, the Federal Reserve reported that industrial output rose by 0.7 percent in April, a stronger-than-expected showing that reflected a continued rebound in manufacturing and a big jump in output by the nation’s utilities. Output had fallen by 0.3 percent in March.

Manufacturing increased 0.5 percent in April following a 0.6 percent rise in March, with production of autos, computers and electronic equipment showing big gains. Output at utilities surged by 3.5 percent as electric power generation during a colder-than-normal April boosted demand for energy to heat homes.

The 0.7 percent rise in overall production was more than double the 0.3 percent gain that had been expected. While analysts said the figure was heavily influenced by the big jump in utility output, they were encouraged by the broad-based gains in manufacturing, which had been struggling in previous months with the overall economic slowdown.

Housing, which had enjoyed record sales in both new and existing homes for five straight years, saw the boom end dramatically in 2006 with many formerly red-hot sales areas suffering big declines in sales and prices.

The slump in housing has been a drag on the overall economy, pushing business growth down to a lackluster 1.3 percent in the first three months of this year, the weakest performance in four years.

A survey by the National Association of Home Builders released on Tuesday indicated that there are more troubles to come as builder sentiment fell to a reading of just 30, matching the low point in the current downturn set last September.

David Seiders, chief economist for the home builders, said the survey found that the rising defaults in the subprime mortgage market were adding to concerns about the ability to reduce a huge inventory of unsold new homes and causing builders to cut back on their plans.

“We’re now projecting that home sales and housing production will not begin improving until late this year and we’re expecting the early stages of the subsequent recovery to be quite sluggish,” Seiders said.

The 2.5 percent rise in construction starts in April reflected a 1.6 percent increase in single-family homes and a 6.3 percent jump in construction of multi-family units.

By region of the country, the increase was led by a 31.3 percent surge in the Northeast and a 7.8 percent increase in the West. Construction activity was down 14.2 percent in the Midwest and 0.1 percent in the South.

Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

www.SOLDTampaBay.com


Posted by Don Suda on May 16th, 2007 1:48 PMPost a Comment (0)

Consumers, lawmakers meet with Citizens reps
May 16th, 2007 1:46 PM
Consumers, lawmakers meet with Citizens reps

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – May 16, 2007 – Some came for information; some came to vent.

In all, more than 160 consumers, including a state senator and two representatives, attended a meeting with top officials from Citizens Property Insurance, the state-run insurance company in Fort Lauderdale on Tuesday afternoon.

Citizens ranks as the largest insurer of houses, condos, apartments and mobile homes in Florida with nearly 1.3 million policies on its books. This was the first of four meetings the insurer plans to hold around the state with consumers.

Irma Kelly, who lives in a mobile-home park in Hollywood, railed about rate increases. Her policy, which moved to Citizens this year, has jumped to $1,200 from about $800, and she’s buying less coverage.

For Kelly and her husband, who live on a fixed pension, the increase was huge. After 17 years in Florida, the Brooklyn native is considering a move back north. “This is not a state for seniors anymore,” Kelly said.

Others like Lee Gorodetsky, an independent insurance agent in Fort Lauderdale, came to see how Citizens could streamline his workload.

Having had to write entirely new policies for about 4,500 clients who had been covered by the Poe Financial Group companies that failed last summer, Gorodetsky had hoped Citizens would allow agents to transfer the existing policies to the company. Despite earning more commission, the workload was huge.

“It was good that Citizens officials get out and listen to policyholders,” said Sen. Jeff Atwater, R-North Palm Beach. “It’s important if Citizens wants to achieve high quality customer service.”

Atwater said he still fields 15 to 20 calls a week from homeowners worried about how they will pay for skyrocketing insurance premiums.

Lawmakers attend

Rep. Franklin Sands, D-Weston, and Rep. Elaine Schwartz, D-Hollywood, were also at the Citizens meeting. Former Rep. Ron Silver was also there.

Facing the crowd were Citizens’ top officials, including Bruce Douglas, chairman of the company’s board of governors; Susanne Murphy, Citizens’ executive vice president; and Paul Palumbo, the company’s senior vice president in charge of underwriting.

In all, Citizens had a team of about a dozen at the meeting. The company also helped about 35 consumers with individual insurance questions and problems. Citizens also used the opportunity to explain some changes stemming from the regular and special legislative sessions this year.

“The enemy is not Citizens,” Douglas told the crowd. “The enemy is the hurricanes.”

Analysis released

Ironically, the Citizens meeting in South Florida took place as an insurance industry group released an economic impact analysis of the changes brought about in the state’s insurance market by laws passed during a special session in January and the regular session earlier this month.

Many of the provisions in these two laws will affect Citizens, including freezing the firm’s rates this year and next and allowing it to expand its operations.

The study pointed out that these new laws will bring about some rate savings from some Floridians by transferring the risk – if Citizens faces a deficit and by providing extra capacity for the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe fund – to all the consumers in the state. All policies, including auto and homeowners, will be assessed if Citizens or the CAT fund has a shortfall.

“The new law may drive away some private insurance companies that would otherwise want to conduct business in Florida,” said Nancy Watkins, principal for Milliman and co-author of the study for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.

Copyright © 2007 The Miami Herald, Beatrice E. Garcia. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
www.SOLDTampaBay.com

Posted by Don Suda on May 16th, 2007 1:46 PMPost a Comment (0)

Business interests caution Crist on property tax relief
May 16th, 2007 1:44 PM
Business interests caution Crist on property tax relief

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) – May 16, 2007 – Leaders of business groups and their lobbyists cautioned Gov. Charlie Crist on Tuesday against shifting more of the tax burden their way in his drive to slash property taxes.

They voiced support for property tax cuts but were worried other taxes or fees would be increased to make up for losses.

Associated Industries of Florida President Barney Bishop also told Crist the cuts shouldn’t be so deep that they harm the ability of cities and counties to provide vital services.

“It’s popular right now to beat up on local government and say they’re the bad guys on the spending,” Bishop said. “I’ve got to tell you, as far as we’re concerned – the feds, the state, local – everybody shares a lot of the blame.”

Crist met with banking, construction, industrial, real estate, retail, hotel-restaurant and chamber of commerce representatives in the Capitol as part of his push for substantial property tax relief.

Lawmakers again will take up the issue in special session June 12 after failing to reach an agreement during their regular session, which ended May 4.

Homebuilders told Crist they were afraid local governments would adopt or increase impact fees on new homes while restaurateurs and hoteliers feared the state might increase taxes on the hospitality industry to make up for property tax cuts.

Many businesses opposed a Republican-sponsored House proposal that would have increased the 6 percent statewide sales tax to as much as 8.5 percent in exchange for slashing or possibly eliminating property tax on primary homes, known as homesteads.

The proposal also drew opposition from the Senate, most House Democrats and Crist. They instead favor rolling back taxes and then capping them with allowances for growth and inflation. There’s been no consensus, though, on how far back they should be rolled.

House Speaker Marco Rubio, R-West Miami, now is pushing another plan that would offer varying exemptions for homes and businesses alike based on percentages of each property’s value. Only primary homes, known as homesteads, now get an exemption – a flat $25,000 regardless of value.

Crist praised Rubio for offering the new proposal.

“Without that move it would have been very difficult to come in here June 12th,” Crist said after the meeting. “But with that move I’m enormously confident.”

Florida Retail Federation President Randy Miller told Crist, who refers to citizens as “the boss,” that homeowners abandoned their role as tax watchdogs. That’s because the existing Save Our Homes Amendment already caps their annual assessment increases at 3 percent.

“The boss was not looking,” Miller said. “We’ve got to put the voters back in charge.”

That could be done by giving bigger tax cuts to non-homestead properties, but Crist later said he still is committed to substantial relief for all taxpayers including homeowners.

Others, though, told Crist taxes were contributing to high housing costs that have made it difficult to find employees.

Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association President Carol Dover said a longtime Key West restaurateur moved from the island city because he couldn’t afford to pay employees enough to afford housing.

“Some hoteliers are actually giving up hotel room for employees to live on property,” Dover said.

Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Bill Kaczor, Associated Press Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted by Don Suda on May 16th, 2007 1:44 PMPost a Comment (0)

NAR Responds to 60 Minutes' May 13, 2007 Segment
May 15th, 2007 1:37 PM
NAR Responds to 60 Minutes' May 13, 2007 Segment
CBS News Magazine Show Misses the Mark

May 14, 2007 -- In the world of political campaigns, it's a standard ploy to set the stage with an empty chair when one candidate refuses to debate his opponents.

The CBS show 60 Minutes gave the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® the empty chair treatment in a May 13 segment that examined the impact of online brokerages on the real estate industry. The show featured interviews with a representative from the now-defunct eRealty and the president and CEO of Redfin, but no one from NAR, even though NAR twice offered and prepared Association spokespersons for interviews with Leslie Stahl. It was CBS that made the decision it would rather interview our opponents and let them make unanswered -- and inaccurate and unfair -- accusations about REALTORS® and NAR policies.

The one-sided journalism and egregious errors served no one well, especially the once-vaunted news magazine show. NAR staff spent nearly a year working with CBS, briefing producers on the issues involved. The producers attended the REALTORS® Conference in New Orleans and met with NAR's legal counsel for half a day in Chicago. Yet, still the segment was full of major errors.

NAR is in communication with 60 Minutes about its unbalanced reporting and presentation of misinformation and will be sending the CBS network a letter demanding an opportunity to correct these errors and misrepresentations.

Here are some examples of the misinformation:
Error: The six percent commission is "sacrosanct."
Fact: All commissions are negotiable. The average commission rate is not 6 percent, but 5.1 percent, according to Real Trends.

Error: NAR is the industry's "governing body."
Fact: NAR is a trade association. It does not govern the industry.

Error: In 2003, NAR issued new rules of its own that threatened to block Internet discounters' access to the MLS.
Fact: The Virtual Office Website policy did not block access to MLSs for discounters or any other brokers who are members of the MLS.

Error: The MLS is the database that lists virtually every home for sale in the country.
Fact: There is no single national MLS. Rather, there are more than 900 local and regional multiple listing services. These are not simply "databases" but private exchange of offers of cooperation and compensation between real estate brokers.

Error: Eight states have "minimum service laws" that require REALTORS® to provide a level of service many Internet discounters can't afford.
Fact: "REALTOR®" is a trademarked term and should never be used synonymously with "real estate agent." The intent of minimum service laws is to ensure consumers receive a minimal level of service from licensees.

Error: The brokerage industry has a powerful lobby. Eleven states flatly prohibit rebates.
Fact: The intent of anti-rebate laws is to prevent kickbacks in real estate transactions, not to limit brokers' incentives to attract customers. The brokerage industry does not lobby for anti-rebate laws.

Other key points 60 Minutes misrepresented or overlooked:
  • NAR supports all business models and favors none. Our 1.3 million members include REALTORS® who work on a full-service basis, as well as those who consider themselves to be limited service, fee-for-service, minimum service, and discounters. We think it's great that consumers have a choice today.
  • The real estate industry has harnessed technology for the benefit of consumers and will continue to do so. Real estate is both high-tech and high-touch, so can be enhanced by both electronic and personal interaction.
  • There is no such thing as a "standard commission." Commissions are negotiable and prices vary. The fact is that commission rates have decreased 16 percent from 1991 to 2004 (source: Real Trends).
  • The real estate business is unique in that competitors must also cooperate with each other to ensure a successful transaction, and MLS systems facilitate that cooperation. The first MLS was created more than 100 years ago as way for brokers to share their listing agreements with each another in hopes of procuring buyers for their properties more quickly and efficiently than they could on their own.
  • The MLS is a tool to help listing brokers find cooperative buyer brokers to help sell their clients' homes. Without the collaborative incentive of the existing MLS, brokers would create their own separate systems, fragmenting rather than consolidating property information.



  • Effective as of May 14, 2007 Last Published May 14, 2007

    Posted by Don Suda on May 15th, 2007 1:37 PMPost a Comment (0)

    HUD hosts housing summit to address problems
    May 15th, 2007 1:36 PM
    HUD hosts housing summit to address problems

    WASHINGTON – May 15, 2007 – How can the U.S. minimize the impact from risky loans, predatory lending and other current real estate problems? The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) yesterday hosted a Homeownership Summit with leading stakeholders in the housing community to discuss the impact of risky, high-priced loans, departmental actions against predatory lending and how modernizing the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) will provide a safer alternative to exotic mortgages.

    HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson delivered the keynote address, where he laid out seven areas of agreement for preserving and protecting homeownership, helping new homeowners keep their homes and improving lending practices.

    “We must make the American Dream a realistic possibility for as many Americans as possible,” said Jackson. “This is not an option; it is a duty. And that goes beyond policy-makers and regulators. It is a shared duty with investors, associations, consumers and communities themselves.”

    HUD invited over 150 investors, consumer advocates, decision-makers and key advisors to assess the current housing situation and offer recommendations. Panel participants met in closed-door sessions moderated by Michelle Singletary of the Washington Post and syndicated columnist Ken Harney.

    Jackson's laid seven areas of agreement for protecting and preserving homeownership are:

    1. Homeownership is still the best investment for the long-term.
    2. Every responsible step must be taken to enable Americans to become homeowners.
    3. Lending should be legal, fiscally responsible and ethical.
    4. Housing counseling is critical and borrowers must read the fine print before buying a home.
    5. There is no place for predatory lending in the housing industry.
    6. Modernization of the Federal Housing Administration is long overdue.
    7. A taxpayer-funded bailout will not resolve housing concerns.

    Jackson says the summit was a part of HUD’s effort to encourage Congress to pass legislation that modernizes the FHA. The program has helped more than 34 million families become homeowners over the past 73 years, but as lending practices have evolved and modernized, the FHA has been unable to do so without legislation.

    “We have internally modernized FHA as much as we can,” says Jackson. “But the time has come to bring FHA into the 21st century. A new FHA could be an antidote for predatory lending and for sub-prime difficulties.”

    Last year, HUD proposed a set of changes to the FHA program that would expand its reach by eliminating outdated downpayment requirements, customizing mortgage premiums for each homebuyer according to risk, and raising loan limits across the country. The bill, the Expanding American Homeownership Act of 2006, passed the House with bipartisan support in July 2006.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

    Posted by Don Suda on May 15th, 2007 1:36 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Foreclosures: Florida up slightly; nation down in April
    May 15th, 2007 1:35 PM
    Foreclosures: Florida up slightly; nation down in April

    IRVINE, Calif. – May 15, 2007 – Florida reported one foreclosure filing for every 510 households, and was seventh highest among the states, according to RealtyTrac. The state’s foreclosure activity increased less than 1 percent since March but was up nearly 72 percent from April 2006.

    Nationally, the April 2007 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report shows a total of 147,708 foreclosure filings nationwide – default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions – reported during the month, down about 1 percent from the previous month but up 62 percent from April 2006. The report shows a national foreclosure rate of one foreclosure filing for every 783 U.S. households during the month.
     
    “After hitting a two-year high in March, U.S. foreclosure activity slipped slightly lower in April,” says James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “Last year, foreclosure activity subsided somewhat during the spring and summer months, thanks in part to increased interest from buyers. Whether the decrease in April is the beginning of a similar trend this year remains to be seen, but we expect foreclosure activity to at least stay above last year’s levels for the remainder of 2007, fueled by a combustible mix of risky loans taken out in the last few years – many in the subprime market – and slowing home price appreciation.”
     
    States with foreclosure rates (percentage) ranking among the nation's 10 highest in April were Nevada, Colorado, Connecticut, California, Ohio, Georgia, Florida, Arizona, Illinois and Michigan. In total number of foreclosures, Florida ranked second to California. States with foreclosure totals among the nation’s 10 highest in April were Ohio, Texas, Illinois, Georgia, Michigan, Colorado, Connecticut and Arizona.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® 

    Posted by Don Suda on May 15th, 2007 1:35 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Crist rallies North Miami town hall meeting on property taxes
    May 15th, 2007 1:34 PM
    Crist rallies North Miami town hall meeting on property taxes

    NORTH MIAMI, Fla. (AP) – May 15, 2007 – Gov. Charlie Crist called it a town hall meeting, but a Monday evening event came across more like an anti-tax rally to rev up for next month’s special legislative session called to bring down property taxes.

    Crist fired up a crowd of more than 500 before taking questions, saying they need to let lawmakers know something needs to be done to address escalating taxes.

    “We need to cut ‘em and cut ‘em hard! We need to reduce them significantly and we know it,” Crist said as the crowd of mostly Haitian-Americans roared its approval. “You’re the best lobbyists on the planet and you have to stay with us and you have to stay strong.”

    As Crist continued on, promising the Legislature will do something to bring tax relief, the crowd applauded and one man shouted out, “Yeah! That’s what we’re talking about!”

    “The people that I serve with run for office and they’re going to be running again next year and they know they have to listen to the boss and be obedient,” Crist said.

    Crist has made lowering property taxes a priority for his first year in office, but lawmakers ended their annual legislative session with different plans to solve the problem. They scheduled a special session from June 12-22 to try again.

    “It’s important to continue to engage the people we work for – the boss – in this process as we get closer to the special session,” Crist said before the meeting.

    The House recently announced a new proposal that would use percentage-based tax exemptions for homes and businesses. It replaces a proposal that would have sharply cut or eliminated taxes on primary homes in exchange for increasing the statewide sales tax from 6 percent to as much as 8.5 percent.

    The Senate’s last proposal called for a rollback on property taxes combined with caps that would have reduced taxes $20 billion over five years, compared to $47 billion reduced over five years under the House plan.

    Crist largely stepped back from the House and Senate negotiations, saying his goal was to provide relief and he wanted to give lawmakers room to work out a plan.

    About a week before the session ended, though, he offered a compromise between the House and Senate plan that would have reduced taxes $34 billion over five years without raising the sales tax.

    Crist said he is encouraged the House and Senate are moving toward an agreement, especially since the House dropped the sales tax swap.

    “They may have a compromise before we even start, which would be a blessing,” Crist told the crowd. “Things are moving fast.”

    Crist, a Republican, was incredibly well received in a community that usually supports Democrats.

    North Miami City Councilor Jacques Despinosse told Crist he voted against him in the November election, but now regrets it.

    “I’ve been watching you so far as a governor and I think I made a mistake,” Despinosse said. “You are doing everything right. I will vote for you next time.”

    One elderly woman in the crowd, speaking in Creole, told Crist, “I am so happy that you are here today. It’s a blessing from God.”

    AP Logo Copyright 2007 The Associated Press, Brendan Farrington, Associated Press Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 15th, 2007 1:34 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Florida’s housing market for 1Q 2007
    May 15th, 2007 1:33 PM
    Florida’s housing market for 1Q 2007: Sales soft, median price down

    ORLANDO, Fla. – May 15, 2007 – In first quarter 2007, Florida’s housing sector continued to mirror the national pattern, with higher inventory levels of homes for sale, median prices edging down and soft sales reflecting a buyer’s market in many areas.

    Statewide, sales of single-family existing homes totaled 33,748 during the three-month period, a decrease of 26 percent compared to 45,844 homes sold during the same time a year earlier, according to the Florida Association of Realtors® (FAR).

    The statewide existing-home median sales price was $237,000 in the first quarter; a year ago, it was $243,500 for a decrease of 3 percent. In 2002, the first-quarter statewide median sales price was $129,600, which reflects an increase of about 82.9 percent over the five-year period. The median is a typical market price where half the homes sold for more, half for less.

    To gain insight into current trends in Florida’s real estate industry, the University of Florida’s Bergstrom Center for Real Estate Studies conducts a quarterly survey of industry executives, market research economists, real estate scholars and other experts. The first quarter 2007 survey, released in March, found that a growing number of respondents believe that home prices are staying even with inflation, said Wayne Archer, the center’s director.

    “We see that as a benchmark,” he said. “When prices maintain the same level as inflation, then we’re probably in some kind of equilibrium. It indicates the market is stabilizing.”

    It appears that residential development may have bottomed out, according to the study. Given the scale of the residential development market, Archer noted this would be good news for all real estate markets and for Florida in general.

    Continuing low mortgage rates remain another positive influence on the housing sector. According to Freddie Mac, the national commitment rate for a 30-year conventional fixed-rate mortgage averaged 6.22 percent in first quarter 2007; one year earlier, it averaged 6.24 percent.

    The latest industry outlook from the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) predicts that stricter lending standards and a decline in subprime mortgage originations will have an impact on existing home sales this year. “Home buyers today are purchasing for the long term, generally with a realistic expectation of modest gains over time,” says NAR Senior Economist Lawrence Yun. “We see this as a soft landing with home sales rising gradually in the second half of the year and prices recovering a bit later.”

    Looking to Florida’s existing condominium market, sales of existing condos also decreased during the quarter, with a total of 10,537 condos sold statewide compared to 15,031 in first quarter 2006 for a 30 percent decline, according to FAR. The statewide median sales price for condos remained flat at $210,800 for the three-month period; a year ago, it was $209,900.

    Among the state’s larger markets, the Jacksonville metropolitan statistical area (MSA) reported 3,373 existing homes sold for the quarter, a decrease of 14 percent compared to the 3,903 homes sold a year earlier. The market’s existing-home median sales price increased 1 percent to $199,500; a year earlier, it was $197,100. A total of 385 existing condos sold in the market over the three-month period, down 23 percent from first quarter 2006, while the existing-condo median price decreased 7 percent to $152,300.

    The Gainesville MSA, one of the smaller markets in the state, reported that 562 homes changed hands in the first quarter, down 23 percent compared to 729 homes sold a year earlier. Over the same period, the market’s existing-home median home price rose 3 percent to $217,100; a year earlier, it was $211,100. A total of 143 existing condos sold in the Gainesville area during the first quarter, a decrease of 40 percent from the previous year, while the existing-condo median price rose 8 percent to $166,800.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

    Posted by Don Suda on May 15th, 2007 1:33 PMPost a Comment (0)

    MONEY NOW, EQUITY LATER
    May 14th, 2007 2:18 PM
    MONEY NOW, EQUITY LATER

    Homeowners in Florida, California, New Jersey, Virginia, Illinois, Washington, Colorado, New York and North Carolina who want to extract equity from their home without incurring a monthly payment have access to a debt-free home equity loan from REX & Co. The investment firm – backed by American International Group’s AIG Financial Products unit – will provide the homeowner with cash in exchange for a percentage of the property’s increase in value at the time of resale. REX founder Thomas Sponholtz says the product is geared toward baby boomers with a substantial amount of wealth in their homes. Homeowners would be charged broker fees upwards of 2 percent of the equity extraction and could be hit with “early exit” fees of 5 percent to 25 percent if they unload their properties within five years of the transaction. During the next two years or so, REX anticipates a national launch of the product.

    Source: Wall Street Journal (05/08/07) P. D3; Hagerty, James R.
    © Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688


    Posted by Don Suda on May 14th, 2007 2:18 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Remodeling up in 2007
    May 14th, 2007 2:16 PM
    Remodeling up in 2007

    WASHINGTON – May 14, 2007 – Americans will spend nearly $233 on home remodeling this year, according to the National Association of Home Builders’ (NAHB) 2007 industry forecast. That represents a 1.9 percent increase from the record $228 billion spent in 2006, according to estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau.

    “Remodeling continues to show strength despite the housing slowdown,” said NAHB Remodelers Chairman Mike Nagel, CGR, CAPS, a home remodeler from Chicago. “With more than 120 million homes in the United States plus $11 trillion in owner equity, the demand for remodeling will be there now and in the future.” Remodeling currently accounts for more than 40 percent of the home construction industry by dollar volume.

    “Quite simply, we’re adding more homes each year than we’re tearing down, and these will eventually require remodeling,” says NAHB Chief Economist David Seiders. “Compared to other components of the housing industry, remodeling remains one of the few areas to show growth, at least in nominal terms.”

    Driving the remodeling market are the size and characteristics of the housing stock. With an average age of 33 years and rising, older homes require more remodeling – both in terms of upgrading features to compete with new construction as well as maintaining their physical quality.

    Though remodeling is somewhat cyclical with new construction, homeowners cannot put off a major repair like a leaky roof as they can discretionary upgrades, and that stabilizes the industry during slower housing markets.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

    Posted by Don Suda on May 14th, 2007 2:16 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Animal House meets the empty nest as condos built for hipsters draw folks over 50
    May 14th, 2007 2:15 PM
    Animal House meets the empty nest as condos built for hipsters draw folks over 50

    NEW YORK – May 14, 2007 – Real-estate developer Lee Schaefer is hovering over a model of his company’s latest swinging-singles complex in Nashville, Tenn. As he surveys the scene, complete with bikini-clad quarter-inch-figures frolicking by a pool, he plucks out a tiny plastic figure from a reject pile – a senior citizen with white hair and a cane. “That’s really not our target demographic,” he says.

    Mr. Schaefer’s Bristol Development Group is pitching the project, Velocity, to twenty- and thirty-something professionals willing to trade space (as little as 535 square feet) for affordability (as low as $165,000) and a chance to live in a hot urban neighborhood. Developers across the country are appealing to young buyers – many of them single, almost all without children – with buildings that promise not just an affordable first home but also a great social life. The amenities tell the story: videogame lounges and outdoor fire pits, rooftop soaking tubs, on-site bars and poolside drinks.

    But it’s not so easy to control demographics in the open market. Some of the buildings are drawing unexpected buyers: people old enough to be the parents of the kids down the hall. And that’s leading to territorial conflicts, social snubs – even planned boardroom coups.

    Such concerns are multiplying as the new buildings fill up with a mix of residents who range broadly in age. In Denver, about half of the units in the recently completed Glass House sold to empty-nesters, despite youth-oriented amenities such as a videogame lounge and a Web site that promises “cool bars” and “a fresh vibe.” In New York, even a hot tub above the lobby and a provocative marketing campaign couldn’t keep boomers away from William Beaver House, slated to open next year.

    And when Viridian opened last October in Nashville, most locals expected the high-rise to draw young buyers looking for a chance to live downtown. It did, but it also attracted people like Julie Lammel, a speech pathologist in her early 50s who moved there from a suburb where most of her neighbors were in her own age group.

    Ms. Lammel says that while the atmosphere at Viridian has been largely cordial, the building has already developed “cliques” and there have been some tensions. Ms. Lammel describes the pool scene, for example, as an “animal house.”

    “One time I went up there and the twenty-somethings had the whole place monopolized,” she recalls, “and I thought, 'Well, not today.'” Ms. Lammel says she and some of her cohorts have a strategy for reclaiming the space, at least temporarily: They’re planning a covered-dish pool party. “Anyone is welcome,” she says in her pleasant Southern drawl. “But we’ll see who shows up.”

    The new developments are a throwback to the sort of singles-oriented complexes that were popular in the ‘60s and ‘70s. But unlike those rental projects, the latest iterations are geared to young people hankering to buy, not rent. Condo developers see opportunity in the demographics.

    According to a study by the National Association of Home Builders, “echo boomers” – those born after 1978 – are twice as likely as people ages 46 to 64 to be house-hunting in the next two years. At the same time, as Americans marry and have children later, the purchases of first-time home-buyers are more likely to be townhouses and downtown condos, not suburban ranches. Married couples now make up just 61 percent of all home-buyers, according to the National Association of Realtors, down from 70 percent a decade ago.

    And many of the young buyers want their neighbors to be more like them. Ricky Florita, a 29-year-old mortgage banker in Nashville, says he avoided buying in Viridian in part because he heard it was attracting “an older crowd.” Instead, he signed a contract for a $160,000 condo in Icon, another project by Bristol Development Group, that will feature a media lounge and a pool plaza with “grilling cabanas” when it opens next year. “I really think it’s going to be a singles scene,” Mr. Florita says. “Every time you were in the sales center, you saw really attractive women buying these condos.”

    Regardless of who’s signing the contract, many of the condos targeting singles are selling. Atlanta’s Novare Group says it has sold more than 4,000 units throughout the Sunbelt since 2002, most of them for less than $275,000, and all of the buildings have sold out within a year of opening. The 417-unit Icon, Bristol’s first such development in Nashville, sold out in two weeks. And Lifestyle Communities in Columbus, Ohio, says it sold nearly 500 condos last year, even as area sales slowed overall. Two-bedroom townhouses start at $119,000.

    It’s 11 p.m. on a Friday night and the crowd at the Goat erupts as Jamie Blackford, 31, pulls off a rare 7-10 split in the bar’s bowling videogame. Mr. Blackford accepts high-fives from friends as Will Kirchner, the bar’s general manager, runs over to see what the commotion is all about. “Did you beat my record?” he asks. (Mr. Blackford has not.)

    The Goat is located in Preserve Crossing, a complex developed by Lifestyle Communities in a suburb of Columbus, Ohio. Many homeowners there say the scene at onsite facilities such as the Goat, the pool and the volleyball court was a big draw. “That was half the reason I moved here,” says Mike Prozy, a 27-year-old mortgage broker. “To meet people and have a great bar down the street.” Many of the complex’s residents are in their 20s and 30s.

    But seated at the bar not far from the bowling game is John Heck, a 54-year-old senior district manager for Waste Management who says he visits the Goat at least once a week. He likes Preserve Crossing’s gym and the quiet streets – ideal for inline skating – and says he has made friends in the development. Still, he recognizes that he’s older than most of his neighbors. “I think I know my place,” he says. “I’m not out looking to hit on the women.”

    Many younger residents, however, say they chose to live there precisely because there wouldn’t be a lot of people Mr. Heck’s age. Beth Paumier, a 29-year-old school psychologist, considered buying a place in other developments that attracted older residents. “They just kind of had that depressing feel,” she says. Mr. Prozy’s wife, Melissa, is even less charitable. Gesturing around the bar, the 22-year-old dancer for the Destroyers, Columbus’s arena football team, says, “Would you want to live next door to a person who is 65?”

    Such concerns illustrate both the opportunity and the pitfalls of targeting younger buyers. Get it right, and buyers will pay a premium for the chance to be surrounded by their friends. Get it wrong - too expensive, too many neighbors that are mom and dad’s age - and developers can be stuck with a building that doesn’t sell.

    The William Beaver House, a planned 320-unit high-rise in Manhattan’s financial district, has an R-rated marketing campaign featuring a martini-swilling beaver (the project is named for its location at the intersection of William and Beaver streets) and provocative, anime-style images of scantily clad men and women trading flirtatious glances. The building will feature a poolside bar, a residents-only penthouse lounge and a 44-seat movie theater that can double as a nightclub.

    So far, though, the project has generated more buzz than sales. A year before the building is set to open, just 30 percent of the units - studios start at $885,000 - have sold, according to the developer, and those that have sold haven’t necessarily gone to the intended demographic. The developer, hotelier Andre Balazs, says early buyers have been “quite a mixed group” with a wide range of ages. “It’s not as young as I thought,” Mr. Balazs says, though he adds that he is generally satisfied with sales thus far.

    Some experts say developers - many of them in their 40s and 50s - don’t always have the right idea about what this generation of buyers is really looking for. Condos replete with barbecue pits and hot tubs may actually be more appealing to boomers than to young home-buyers looking for a sound investment. A recent survey by the National Association of Home Builders found that price was by far the most significant factor among young condo buyers; location was a distant second. In addition, people under 35 were less likely than their older counterparts to say they take advantage of many on-site facilities.

    “It was a slight attraction,” says Lisa DiNitto, 31, of the offerings at Realm, a 406-unit development in Atlanta’s Buckhead neighborhood, where she recently bought her first condo. Much more significant, Ms. DiNitto says, was the opportunity to buy a unit in a new building - and the chance to become a homeowner after years of paying rent.

    Indeed, on a recent Tuesday evening at Realm, the lounge off the lobby sat empty, its flat-screen televisions switched off and its pool table unused. An upstairs club room had more flat-screens but no one was watching them. Outside, jets sprayed arching streams of water into a vacant swimming pool, and the fire pit and barbecue on the terrace were unlit.

    Eating dinner on the patio, Robert Burns, 24, and his girlfriend, Michelle Meyers, 22, said they had heard that Eclipse, another building by the same developers, Novare Group and Wood Partners, was a wilder time. “Eclipse is like spring break in Mexico,” says Mr. Burns. But a trip to Eclipse found a couple of residents playing a quiet game of pool and not much else of a scene.

    That’s not quite the picture painted by Novare’s marketing materials. At the sales center for Twelve Centennial Park - the firm’s latest Atlanta project, a 1,034-unit development where condos begin at just under $200,000 - the walls are covered with images of couples kissing in a bar and lying together in the grass. (The high-rise will not feature a lawn.) “You’re here for a good time,” says the project’s Web site. “That’s why there’s a cool lifestyle waiting for you to jump right in.”

    Other developments pitching sex, beer and videogames are coming closer to delivering on that promise. Brad Mayer, a 31-year-old financial adviser, says he bought an apartment in 1211 Light, a new condo in Baltimore, because living in the suburbs was “killing me socially.” The building, a former hospital in the city’s Federal Hill neighborhood, has “a Melrose Place vibe” complete with relationship drama, though none involving him. (“I’m 31,” says Mr. Mayer, who paid $376,000 for his new place. “I learned the hard way not to deal with that.”)

    Richard Cook, a 35-year-old software engineer in Atlanta who says he was “hoping to meet girls” when he bought a $240,000 one-bedroom condo in Novare and Wood’s Spire high-rise in 2005, reports that there’s a lot going on there, including monthly parties where residents gather in one condo for drinks before repairing to a local restaurant. It’s a bit like college life, Mr. Cook says, “but you don’t have an RA on your case.”

    Elsewhere, some older residents are readjusting to dorm life. Gayle Strong, a 53-year-old attorney, recently moved into a two-bedroom condo in Denver’s Glass House. “I guess I have this mindset that I’m a youthful-looking 50-year-old,” she says. At a recent mixer in the building, she wound up chatting about bicycling with several of her neighbors. “It was fun,” she says. “But some of them are a lot closer in age to my kids.”

    At Viridian in Nashville, however, the party may soon be over. An insurgent group of 40- and 50-year-olds is looking to take over the condo board. Among them: Ms. Lammel, who says she intends to propose rules that would put the kibosh on spring break at the pool. “I decided I should stop just complaining and do something about it,” she says.

    AP LogoCopyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Ben Casselman (The Wall Street Journal). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 14th, 2007 2:15 PMPost a Comment (0)

    As the market loses some of its sizzle, South Florida landlords are offering more deals
    May 14th, 2007 2:14 PM
    As the market loses some of its sizzle, South Florida landlords are offering more deals

    FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – May 14, 2007 – When Denise McGill moved to Palm Beach County from rural North Carolina two years ago, she was stunned at the high cost of housing. So she found a roommate and resigned herself to renting.

    “In retrospect, I definitely did the right thing,” said McGill, 38, an assistant photojournalism professor at Palm Beach Atlantic University in West Palm Beach. “I’m so glad I didn’t buy because I would have bought at the peak of the market.”

    South Florida’s rental market became one of the hottest in the nation in recent years, thanks to skyrocketing housing costs and a surge of condominium conversions that shrank the inventory of apartments. With home prices declining, many renters are staying put, hoping prices fall even further and waiting to see what Florida legislators do to address soaring property taxes.

    But the rental sector will lose some of its sizzle in 2007, analysts say. Short-term investors who can’t sell homes and condos bought during the housing boom will try to rent them, helping create more vacancies and less rent growth across the region.

    “This is something we have to watch over the next couple of quarters because the market is adjusting,” said Sam Chandan, chief economist for New York-based research firm Reis Inc.

    During the past few years, competition for a dwindling supply of apartments pushed down vacancies in Palm Beach and Broward counties. Landlords responded by raising rents, which climbed to almost $1,050 last year from about $900 in 2003, according to Reis.

    Even during the first quarter of 2007, it was difficult finding an apartment in Broward, which had the nation’s 12th lowest vacancy rate, 3.8 percent, according to the National Association of Realtors. Things weren’t as tight in Palm Beach County, where the January-to-March vacancy rate of 5.1 percent ranked 32nd.

    But condo conversions have tailed off after peaking two years ago. Tepid sales have thousands of units back on the market as rentals.

    Changes at the Spring Harbor apartment complex in Delray Beach are typical of those across the region. It briefly converted to condos, only to revert back to rentals when sales didn’t meet expectations.

    Meanwhile, developers are building more apartments. Palm Beach County, for example, will have more than 2,000 new apartments by the end of 2007, up almost 18 percent over last year, the National Association of Realtors said.

    The batch of new units and a rising inventory of investor-owned rentals are providing more of a selection and easing rent increases that were so common in the past four years.

    Landlords recognize the changing landscape and are starting to offer deals, such as a month’s free rent and discounted fees, said Susan Harding, publisher of the Boca Raton-based Southeast Florida Apartment Guide.

    “Vacancy is lost money,” Harding said. “So we’re seeing a lot more concessions out there designed to get people moved in.”

    All things being equal, consumers prefer to buy homes rather than rent. But the median price of an existing home has shot up by more than 165 percent in Broward and Palm Beach counties since January 2000.

    Palm Beach County’s median price for March was $375,100, while Broward’s median was $372,400, according to the Florida Association of Realtors. The Orlando-based trade group releases April figures later this month.

    It isn’t just the basic price of homes that made consumers cringe. They also complained about massive increases in property taxes and insurance premiums, which pushed monthly mortgage payments out of reach.

    Renting quickly became the only way for many people to afford living in South Florida from 2000 to 2005.

    Monica Williams wanted to buy her first house two years ago. But she settled into a two-bedroom apartment in Plantation, paying $1,167 a month in rent.

    “I didn’t know if I’d ever be able to buy,” the 36-year-old flight attendant said. “I was afraid I’d have to move out of South Florida altogether.”

    Williams saved money and paid off debts to get in position to own. She recently bought a townhouse in Plantation.

    But many people won’t be buying. Lenders are tightening credit standards, keeping potential homeowners in the rental pool.

    Others realize home prices won’t increase as fast as they have in recent years, Reis’ Chandan said.

    “That pressure to buy isn’t there,” he said. “I think that may tip things in favor of renting.”

    Ron Witten, owner of a Dallas-based apartment advisory firm, agrees.

    “There remains a degree of uncertainty about housing prices,” he said. “And if [price] is important to you as a buyer, then waiting’s the safe way to go.”

    Copyright © 2007 South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Paul Owers. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
     

    Posted by Don Suda on May 14th, 2007 2:14 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Citizens growth called risky: All Floridians could pay if major storm hits
    May 14th, 2007 2:13 PM
    Citizens growth called risky: All Floridians could pay if major storm hits

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 14, 2007 – When Citizens Property Insurance Corp. started in 2002, the idea was the state-backed company would eventually shrink, insuring only those who absolutely couldn’t find homeowner coverage anywhere else.

    What a difference a new governor makes.

    With Florida’s homeowners facing crippling property insurance premium increases and more private insurers dropping policies or pulling out of the state, Gov. Charlie Crist began his term in January vowing to fix the insurance crisis. His philosophy: let Citizens, the state’s insurer of last resort, compete with big private insurers.

    Citizens already was the state’s largest home insurer, with 1.2 million-plus policies surpassing State Farm Florida Insurance Co. last year. But Crist and the Florida Legislature have raised Citizens’ stake in Florida’s insurance market.

    And that’s a problem, according to a growing chorus that includes state Chief Financial Officer Alex Sink. The worry: All Floridians could be on the hook for an expanded Citizens.

    The turnabout in Citizens’ mission “has been stunning, in a word,” Sink said.

    After Crist signs legislation passed on May 4 at the close of the legislative session, Floridians can opt for a Citizens policy if their private company’s rates are at least 15 percent higher than what Citizens charges. Citizens will now offer full property coverage, including fire, theft and liability insurance to coastal residents – east of Interstate 95 in most of South Florida and east of Alternate A1A in northern Palm Beach County – rather than just covering homes for costly hurricane damage. And the incentive: Citizens’ customers will have their rates frozen at December 2006 levels until January 2009.

    “I saw an insurance lobbyist say that this would be a catastrophe. Well, I’ve got news for them. We’re in a catastrophe now,” Crist told reporters last week. “Ask any family in Florida if they are happy about what they’ve had to pay in insurance. We’re already in a crisis, for crying out loud. The obligation was to try to change that, to turn that ship around.”

    The concern of Sink and other critics is what happens if a major hurricane hits and drains Citizens. That could force all Floridians to pay extra charges on their property and automobile insurance policies to cover the state company’s shortfall.

    Floridians already are paying extra charges on their property insurance policies to bail out the company’s 2004 and 2005 deficits – $516 million and $1.7 billion, respectively. If Citizens isn’t charging homeowners enough for coverage, that means there’s a bigger chance residents statewide will have to dig into their pockets, Sink said.

    “At the end of the day Floridians are going to be paying, not private insurance companies,” Sink said. “That’s to me the scary thing about an environment in which Citizens has so much big market share.”

    Members of the House of Representatives spent part of the last day of the two-month annual session debating whether those who aren’t insured by Citizens should have to bear the nonprofit company’s burden if it runs out of money.

    State Rep. Don Brown, the House Insurance Committee chairman, said people can live wherever they like in the state, but “they simply do not have a right to expect that everyone else would fund their choices.”

    “You’re picking the pockets of some, so that someone else can have the benefit,” said Brown, R-DeFuniak Springs. ... “We need to think long and we need to think hard about what we’re doing.”

    It’s an argument with strong backing from many in the insurance industry, who say the state is heading down the wrong path.

    Letting Citizens compete means private insurers are discouraged from coming to Florida or expanding business here as the market stabilizes, said Justin Glover, a spokesman for State Farm Florida Insurance Co., the state’s largest private home insurer.

    Plus, he said a more competitive Citizens can actually benefit big insurers like State Farm Florida. Not that State Farm Florida wants to lose customers, Glover said, but policy holders now can abandon their policies and switch to Citizens. And that means the storm risk once carried by a private insurance company is now on the state’s shoulders.

    “That benefits the company,” Glover said. “The person who pays the bill is the citizens of Florida.”

    Estimates aren’t available of how the Legislature’s actions will expand Citizens, but industry officials project a competitive Citizens will squeeze out private insurers as price-conscious consumers jump to the state-backed insurer for cheaper coverage.

    The people’s insurer?

    Those who support Crist in his efforts to enlarge Citizens acknowledge the risk, but say something must be done to help bring down insurance prices for homeowners.

    House Democratic Leader Dan Gelber of Miami Beach calls the Legislature’s recent moves “faith-based initiatives,” but said the prevailing thinking was there were two choices with Citizens – either let it expand to spread its risk wider or find ways to shrink the company.

    “Right now, it has straddled the fence, and it’s a very precarious position,” Gelber said. “We have to go one way or another. [Crist] wants to enlarge Citizens’ base, and in doing so, he may actually inspire some competition. I think he’s doing something.”

    Citizens board chairman Bruce Douglas said he thinks the company is up to the task Crist has given. The company has overhauled operations and hired customer service staff to handle more policy holders. Two years ago, Citizens faced a torrent of criticism from state legislators for the way it mishandled customers after the hurricanes in 2004.

    He thinks doom-and-gloom projections over a mushrooming Citizens are overblown, noting that the company’s policy numbers have actually decreased in the past two months.

    He doesn’t expect a stampede of new customers based on coverage savings, because switching insurance companies could mean people lose multi-policy discounts with private insurers or would no longer be able to use their insurance agent.

    Still, more people are applying for Citizens policies, with the company now averaging 70,000 applications a month, the highest level in its history. But Douglas said Citizens only insures about 30 percent of the state’s home and condominium owners.

    “We really are kind of the people’s insurance company,” Douglas said. “We’re no longer the insurance company of last resort. We’re more an alternative insurance company with more competitive possibilities.”

    Copyright © 2007 South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Kathy Bushouse and Mark Hollis. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 14th, 2007 2:13 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Federal Reserve keeps US interest rates steady
    May 11th, 2007 6:12 AM
    Federal Reserve keeps US interest rates steady

    WASHINGTON (AP) – May 10, 2007 – The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady, extending a nearly yearlong period of stability that has positives for savers and borrowers.

    Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his central bank colleagues on Wednesday left an important interest rate unchanged at 5.25 percent, where it has stood since last June. The decision was unanimous.

    The Fed’s decision means that commercial banks’ prime interest rate – for certain credit cards, home equity lines of credit and other loans – stays at 8.25 percent.

    Borrowers had suffered through two years of rate increases. But the current period of steadiness can help them regain their footing by paying down or consolidating debt, experts said, and predictable rates can help with investment decisions.

    For savers, “although rates have stabilized, they have stabilized at attractive levels,” said Greg McBride, a senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com. “They can earn in excess of 5 percent for a range of bank products from money market accounts to five-year CDs.”

    On Wall Street, the Fed’s action and views about the U.S. economy gave stocks a lift. The Dow Jones industrials gained 53.80 points to close at 13,362.87, a record.

    Investors are craving an interest rate cut. But many economists believe the Fed may keep rates right where they are through most – if not all – of this year.

    The Fed used the same language as it did at its previous meeting, in March, and said any future rate change will depend on data about growth and inflation.

    Assessing economic conditions, Fed policymakers noted that growth slowed earlier this year and the economy is still feeling the impact of the housing slump.

    While that was a tad more bearish than its previous assessment, Fed policymakers nonetheless continued to predict that the economy will expand at a “moderate pace.”

    The Fed also stuck to its forecast that inflation should recede over time. Yet it renewed its warning that underlying inflation – which excludes food and energy prices – remains “somewhat elevated.” Policymakers once again said that their “predominant” concern is if inflation fails to moderate as expected.

    Inflation is bad for the economy and for peoples’ pocketbooks. Out of control prices can eat away at workers’ paychecks, investments and standards of living.

    The Fed’s goal is for the economy to slow sufficiently to fend off inflation, but not so much as to slide into a recession.

    The Fed’s decision to leave rates alone comes as economic growth has slowed, and inflation, while showing some improvement, is too high for the Fed’s tastes.

    Economic growth slowed to a near crawl of 1.3 percent in the first quarter of this year, the worst performance in four years.

    Fallout from the housing slump was the main culprit, causing businesses to tighten spending. Consumers, however, showed resilience and managed to boost their spending sufficiently to keep the economy moving ahead.

    Some wonder just how much fervor consumers will have in the months ahead, given rising energy prices and some signs of cooling in job growth.

    The unemployment rate edged up to 4.5 percent in April as payrolls grew by just 88,000, the fewest in two and a half years.

    Energy prices have surged to a record nationwide average of $3.07 per gallon (81 cents a liter), according to oil industry analyst Trilby Lundberg. The previous record was $3.03 per gallon, on Aug. 11, 2006.

    Inflation is running above the Fed’s 1 percent to 2 percent comfort zone. An inflation gauge that excludes volatile energy and food prices was up 2.1 percent in March from a year earlier. That was better than the 2.4 percent annual increase logged in February.

    “The Fed is really in a box right now. Growth in the early part of this year has been sluggish. On the other hand, prices are still under a lot of pressure. That doesn’t really give the Fed room to either ease rates or tighten them,” said Carl Tannenbaum, chief economist at LaSalle Bank.

    Tannenbaum predicts rates will remain where they are through the rest of this year. Some other economists think the Fed could cut rates later this year if the economy shows signs of faltering and the unemployment rate kept climbing.

    On the Net: Federal Reserve:
    http://www.federalreserve.gov

    AP LogoCopyright 2007 The Associated Press, Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 11th, 2007 6:12 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Citizens Insurance approves sinkhole coverage plan
    May 11th, 2007 6:06 AM
    Citizens Insurance approves sinkhole coverage plan

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 10, 2007 – Citizens Property Insurance Corp. gave final approval yesterday to a sinkhole plan designed to save policyholders money if they forego insurance coverage for moderate sinkhole damage.

    Residents of Pasco and Hernando could save as much as 58-60 percent on homeowner’s premiums under the new sinkhole coverage guidelines, a Citizens Property Insurance Corporation official says – providing, of course, that they don’t actually incur any sinkhole damage.
     
    Under the new provisions, Pasco and Hernando County residents will receive coverage offers that do not include full sinkhole coverage and they can weigh the risk of foregoing coverage against the cost savings. Even if they forego full sinkhole coverage, however, their basic policy will continue to cover any catastrophic ground-cover collapse caused by a sinkhole. But moderate damage caused by a nearby sinkhole – cracked walls, broken water lines, etc. – would no longer be covered.
     
    The sinkhole-optional coverage applies to all Florida residents covered by Citizens, but homeowners in the other 65 counties won’t be given the option upfront. Should they wish to cancel full sinkhole coverage, they must call their insurance agent and request it; otherwise, full coverage and its premium cost will remain part of their basic homeowners insurance policy.
     
    Scott Wallace, president of Citizens, says the company will work with local and state officials in Pasco and Hernando counties to hold public meetings to make sure policyholders understand the upcoming changes.
     
    Letters of notification regarding the changes in Pasco and Hernando counties will begin to go out in June. The changes take effect in September.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® 

    Posted by Don Suda on May 11th, 2007 6:06 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Special session on property tax formally called
    May 11th, 2007 6:04 AM
    Special session on property tax formally called

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) – May 10, 2007 – House and Senate leaders Wednesday formally called a special session on property tax relief for June 12-22 and appointed a joint committee to draft proposed legislation in the interim.

    Senate President Ken Pruitt, R-Port St. Lucie, and House Speaker Marco Rubio, R-West Miami, had announced plans for the special session last week after the chambers were unable to sort out their differences on the issue with only two days left in the 60-day regular 2007 session. It ended last Friday.

    The joint committee is scheduled to meet May 21 to review and discuss options and June 4 to present proposed legislation.

    Rep. Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park, who will head the House side of the joint committee, said he has spoken with Senate Majority Leader Dan Webster, R-Winter Garden, since the regular session and they plan to continue their conversations before the first committee meeting.

    “We’ve got sort of an open line of communication,” Cannon said. “We’re definitely moving in the right direction.”

    Cannon declined to disclose details of that direction.

    Lawmakers are trying to find a solution to soaring tax bills resulting mainly from rising property values. They also are looking at inequities in the system that have resulted in some taxpayers getting bills many times higher than neighbors with similar properties.

    Pruitt and Rubio called the special session to deal exclusively with property taxes, and they have been adamant that lawmakers should focus only on that issue.

    Gov. Charlie Crist has said he may expand the session, though, to include auto insurance and children’s health insurance issues, but he has not yet made a decision.

    Florida’s no-fault auto insurance law will expire Oct. 1 unless the Legislature passes a law to continue it.

    If the law expires, crash victims may have to file lawsuits against at-fault motorists to get their medical expenses paid. The existing system pays the first $10,000 of those expenses regardless of who is at fault. Insurers say the system is so rife with fraud it should be allowed to expire.

    Some lawmakers have urged Crist to include legislation simplifying the state’s KidCare children’s health insurance program. Advocates say its complexity has caused thousands of children to needlessly go without coverage.

    During the regular session, both chambers offered tax-cutting plans that included rolling back taxes to a prior year and then capping them with allowances for growth and inflation or increases in personal income.

    Those plans differed on the details, but the House also passed a Republican-backed proposal that would have slashed or eliminated property taxes on primary homes, known as homesteads, in exchange for increasing the statewide 6 percent sales tax to as much as 8.5 percent.

    Most House Democrats and senators of both parties strenuously objected to the tax swap.

    The chambers also were far apart in taxpayer savings. When negotiations broke off, the Senate was at about $20 billion over five years and the House at nearly $50 billion in the same span.

    Crist has entered the debate with his own $34 billion proposal, essentially splitting the difference, but without a tax swap. The governor said he has been calling lawmakers since the regular session ended to push his plan.

    AP LogoCopyright 2007 The Associated Press, Bill Kaczor, Associated Press Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 11th, 2007 6:04 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Plans unveiled for Sunrise
    May 9th, 2007 2:10 PM

    Plans unveiled for Sunrise

    By MICHAEL D. BATES
    mbates@hernandotoday.com


    BROOKSVILLE — Only two weeks after they approved the adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment paving the way for the 1,750-home Hickory Hill development in Spring Lake, county commissioners Monday looked at plans for another mega-residential and commercial project called Sunrise in that same planned development district.

    When built out, Sunrise would have 4,800 homes, 75 motel rooms, 365,000 square feet of retail space, 50,000 square feet of offices, a golf course, clubhouse — all on 1,385 acres east of Interstate 75 and State Road 50.

    Joseph Tew, a Clearwater attorney representing Sunrise, laid out for commissioners a master plan showing how area roads, parks, utilities, schools and other infrastructure improvements would accommodate the proposed community.

    Because it was a workshop, commissioners did not vote on the plan. Instead, they directed planning staff time to meet with the developer and report back by the July 24 public hearing, when the board will consider approving Sunrise as a development of regional impact (DRI).

    Monday’s workshop gave county commissioners a chance to see if the developer was “conceptually on the right track,” Planning Director Ron Pianta said.

    Tew said he would be ready with a finished product in time for the July 24 deadline.

    “We’re at least 90 percent to the goal line,” Tew said.

    As first reported in Hernando Today this week, Sunrise has agreed to donate 75 acres of land along Kettering Road to the school district for the purpose of building a new school. The acreage would be divided into two parcels.

    Some of the road improvements include the four-laning of Kettering Road, creating a two-lane Lockhart Road extension, adding four lanes to the Sunrise Parkway, adding two more lanes (for a total of six) to S.R. 50 and making off-ramp improvements to I-75.

    The developer is also planning on building several new roads leading into the community.

    Total cost of roadway improvements is $34 million, with the developer paying his proportionate share to offset costs.

    Because Sunrise and Hickory Hill are both located in the planned development project surrounding I-75 and S.R. 50, the two communities are similar in concept and would tie into the same road network, Tew said.

    “At the end of the day, we’ll all be using the same facilities and driving the same roads,” Tew said.

    The developer and planning staff will also hammer out a development order that will serve as a blueprint for the development, according to Assistant County Attorney Jeff Kirk.

    “We’ll be working closely with planning in terms of creating a development order that protects the county,” Kirk said.


    Posted by Don Suda on May 9th, 2007 2:10 PMPost a Comment (0)

    GATORS WIN AGAIN
    May 9th, 2007 2:09 PM
    GATORS WIN AGAIN

    Authors Bert Sperling and Peter Sander have named Gainesville the best place to live in the United States, identifying the college town as No. 1 out of 375 metropolitan areas in the latest edition of their book, “Cities Ranked & Rated.” Despite hot and humid summers, and a high rate of violent crime, Gainesville scored in several other areas, with the authors lauding its “strong concentration of young people and active retirees.” Sperling and Sander considered cost of living, quality of life, climate, commute times, affordable housing, crime, growth and sprawl in calculating rankings. The remaining cities in the top 10 are, in order, Bellingham, Wash.; Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, Ore.-Wash.; Colorado Springs, Colo.; Ann Arbor, Mich.; Ogden-Clearfield, Utah; Asheville, N.C.; Fort Collins-Loveland, Colo.; San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, Calif.; and Boise City-Nampa, Idaho.

    Source: USA Today (05/07/07) Minzesheimer, Bob
    © Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688


    Posted by Don Suda on May 9th, 2007 2:09 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Congress debates mortgage reforms
    May 9th, 2007 2:09 PM
    Congress debates mortgage reforms

    WASHINGTON – May 9, 2007 – Congress is looking at potential reforms to risky home lending practices, although a House subcommittee hearing on Tuesday suggests lawmakers are still sorting out the complex workings of the mortgage market and wondering whether reforms will be necessary or helpful.

    With the number of foreclosures nationally jumping 47 percent in March from a year ago, lawmakers are weighing whether new lending rules are needed or whether the market is already in the process of self-correcting. The task of crafting reforms is made more complicated by the long list of players involved in mortgage transactions.

    “There is a very complicated web of contributors to this issue that makes it very difficult and unwieldy to unwind,” said Rep. Melvin Watt, D-N.C., at Tuesday’s hearing of the House Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.

    Watt and other committee members said Congress needs to avoid unintended consequences of trying to fix the housing market.

    “It’s kind of like the Pillsbury dough boy,” Watt said. “If you push in one place, it juts out somewhere else.”

    Their concerns were echoed by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., the subcommittee’s chairwoman, although she made clear that Congress is willing if need be to address the issues.

    “This committee is by no means waiting for the private sector to do what it thinks is right to solve this rapidly growing crisis,” she said.

    Last week, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio and Bob Casey, D-Pa., introduced a bill that would mandate tougher federal standards for mortgage lenders even as Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., was emphasizing that increased regulatory oversight and voluntary reforms by lenders are preferable to legislation.

    The mortgage industry, in general, has argued that reform could restrict lending in the near term, hurting low-income borrowers – the intended beneficiaries.

    Still, Cara Heiden, president of Wells Fargo & Co.’s mortgage lending division, testified Tuesday in favor of federal lending standards and national regulation of mortgage brokers.

    Wells Fargo, she said, already has a ban on risky lending practices, including, for example, loans on which the principal balance can increase over time.

    Big financial institutions and Wall Street investment firms have in recent years increasingly bought home loans in bulk from banks and other lenders and bundled them into securities to be sold to investors, theoretically spreading risk and helping provide more funds for lending.

    Critics say the creation of this secondary market in mortgages caused housing lenders to be too lenient in evaluating high-risk or subprime borrowers. Instead, they argue, mortgage brokers and banks approved mortgages as quickly and as often as possible so they could profit from the huge demand for securitized mortgages.

    Consumer advocates say investors in bundled or pooled mortgages should be held legally accountable for encouraging lax lending practices. They argue that mortgage-holders should file lawsuits against investors and mortgage lenders if there’s proof that their actions were illegal or abusive.

    But industry representatives say investors, who had no direct role in loan approvals, can’t be held legally responsible for creating excesses in subprime lending.

    Several lawmakers warned against overzealous reform efforts, citing Georgia’s experience as a textbook case. A predatory lending law was enacted in the state in the fall of 2002 that allowed borrowers to seek punitive damages from anyone who bought a loan or a security that included the loan.

    In response, the three major credit-rating agencies decided they would no longer rate the credit quality of securities containing Georgia home loans. More than 25 lenders pulled out of the state in the wake of the credit agencies’ move.

    Georgia’s legislature subsequently adopted a law limiting liability for loan abuses to original lenders.

    If Congress isn’t careful, said Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., “it will harm low- and middle-income Americans and their ability to finance and purchase a home.”

    Some lawmakers, however, expressed frustration at the hearing that Congress can’t tackle the issues head-on.

    “We agree that there is a problem, but we don’t want to do anything about it it seems,” said Rep. Al Green, D-Texas.

    AP LogoCopyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Alan Sibel (AP Business Writer). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 9th, 2007 2:09 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Tax-funded storm model paints a grimmer picture
    May 9th, 2007 2:08 PM
    Tax-funded storm model paints a grimmer picture

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 9, 2007 – Even as Gov. Charlie Crist and other politicians seek to lower property insurance rates, other forces are trying to push them higher.

    This week, a commission of experts is reviewing the computer catastrophe models that companies use to help set rates, and the worst news so far comes from an unexpected source: a model paid for with taxpayer money.

    This public model, a kind of software, was created as a check and balance against private models. But in tests last month, a team that reports to House Speaker Marco Rubio found that the public model projects the highest losses of all -- as much as double other models.

    That means it could be used to justify the highest rates of all, too, and with imprint of software designed to protect consumers.

    Some representatives of the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation have been praising the public model for the past year, but others saw signs of trouble.

    Alex Sink, the state’s chief financial officer, is concerned about the public model, said her spokeswoman Tara Klimek. Last year, an analyst with Sink’s office noticed that one private insurance company switched its rate filing justification from a private model to the public one.

    “Once it was put into the public model, the rates were actually higher,” Klimek said.

    Members of the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Prevention Methodology, which is meeting this week in Tallahassee, noted the team that built the public model may be able to fix any flaws and still gain approval this week.

    Without formal approval, the model cannot be used to help set rates.

    There’s more potential bad news for consumers.

    On Thursday, the commission will vote on a private model from Risk Management Solutions of Newark, Calif. It predicts losses 25 percent to 50 percent higher than the previous version developed by the company.

    RMS shifted from the traditional approach of using 100 years of historical data on storms and an approach that estimates average frequency and severity to a new approach, one that estimates patterns between 2006 and 2010.

    The RMS model has been criticized by scientists and consumer advocates, and the state of Louisiana recently put its use on hold pending a decision by the Florida commission. Florida conducts the most detailed model review process in the nation.

    The Florida public model has been in the works for years.

    It was created by a team at Florida International University in Miami, with $2.7 million provided by the Legislature.

    According to a news release issued by the university when the model was unveiled last year, the project was initiated by U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson when he was state insurance commissioner, and his successor, Tom Gallagher, was responsible for securing funding.

    “University researchers and associates have produced a transparent model independent of the insurance industry and state regulatory agencies,” said Shahid Hamid, professor of finance at FIU and the leader of the project.

    So far, things may not have turned out quite that way.

    Bob Milligan, Florida’s insurance consumer advocate, is part of the model review commission and he’s also concerned about the initial tests of the public model.

    If the public model shows the highest possible losses from future storms, then everybody will use it to set rates, Milligan said.

    “And you’re up the creek without a paddle,” he said.

    Copyright © 2007 Tampa Tribune, Fla., Kevin Begos. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

    Related:
    Experts agree 2007 to be active hurricane season in U.S

    Posted by Don Suda on May 9th, 2007 2:08 PMPost a Comment (0)

    THE $5 HOME MAKEOVER
    May 9th, 2007 11:24 AM
    THE $5 HOME MAKEOVER

    Real estate professionals in Sacramento, Calif., suggest five $5 investments that boost curb appeal or make a listing more attractive to potential buyers:
    • Give the trim around the front door a fresh coat of paint, covering up fingerprints and dings.
    • Fertilize the grass so it’s bright green.
    • Hang a small flag that says, “Welcome.”
    • Place a big pot of yellow marigolds in the foyer – yellow makes people feel comfortable.
    • Dribble a few drops of vanilla on the oven door and turn it to low. (It’ll smell just like cookies baking.)
     
    Source: The Sacramento Bee, Jim Wasserman (05/04/07)
    © Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688

    **********************************************************


    Posted by Don Suda on May 9th, 2007 11:24 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Before selling a home, test the plumbing
    May 9th, 2007 11:23 AM
    Before selling a home, test the plumbing

    WACO, Texas – May 8, 2007 –With today’s housing market in a slump, a homeowner should test the home’s plumbing to make sure the plumbing will pass the home inspection that comes with selling the house.

    “Most home buyers hire a professional home inspector to take a closer look at the house before they close,” says Mary Kennedy Thompson, president of the Mr. Rooter Corporation. “Taking care of any necessary repairs now could expedite the closing process.”

    Thompson offers these tips to keep a plumbing problem from throwing a wrench in the home-selling experience:

    • Examine all faucets to make sure none drip.

    • Open cabinet doors and check under sinks for leaks.

    • Turn water supply valves on and off to test for leaks.

    • Look for rust and corrosion on all plumbing features (sinks, pipes, etc.).

    • Flush the toilet. Does it continue running after the tank is full? Is all debris cleared from the bowl?

    • Inspect the base of the toilet for signs of water damage or soft floors.

    • Run the garbage disposal and dishwasher to make sure they work properly.

    • Check the first four digits of the water heater’s serial number (they are the month and year it was made) to make sure it isn’t more than 10 years old.

    • Fill up each sink and bathtub with water to verify good drain flow.

    • Inspect the water meter and observe a small dial which spins when any amount of water moves through the system. This will detect even small amounts of water loss.

    • If your home has a basement, look up at the ceiling above the bathroom to examine floor boards for plumbing leaks.

    • Hire a professional plumber to video inspect the sewer line to verify it is in good condition.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

    Posted by Don Suda on May 9th, 2007 11:23 AMPost a Comment (0)

    More South Florida homes on the market longer
    May 9th, 2007 11:22 AM
    More South Florida homes on the market longer

    MIAMI – May 8, 2007 – The number of houses and condos sitting on the market with For Sale signs and lower prices continues to grow in South Florida, according to the latest survey by condovultures.com.

    The company, a real estate advisory firm in Bal Harbour, tracks homes for sale where the asking price has fallen 10 percent or $100,000, or has been on the market for at least 100 days. It follows properties east of Interstate 95 in Miami-Dade and Broward counties – areas with significant new construction.

    The report, tracking activity to April 30, found 1,744 properties with significant price dips or more than three months on the market in the two counties, up from 1,493 in March. The properties included 1,060 condos and 684 houses.

    Peter Zalewski, principal at condovultures.com, said the sluggish market is reaching a point where so-called vulture funds – investment groups looking to buy condos in bulk and at discounted prices – may start jumping in. “Big, bulk buyers are starting to come off the perch,” he said. “If we are not there yet, we are just around the corner.”

    Copyright © 2007 The Miami Herald, Matthew Haggman. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 9th, 2007 11:22 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Crist doesn’t want property taxes left to reform commission
    May 9th, 2007 11:20 AM
    Crist doesn’t want property taxes left to reform commission

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) – May 8, 2007 – Gov. Charlie Crist said Monday that the Legislature should resolve property tax issues, not leave them to a constitutional panel that is taking a broader look at Florida’s taxation and budget systems.

    Crist and lawmakers have promised to cut soaring property taxes and make them fairer in response to taxpayer protests, but they were unable to get that done during the Legislature’s regular 60-day session, which ended last Friday.

    The governor, though, said he hoped the Taxation and Budget Reform Commission, which is meeting this year and next, would have “as little as possible” to do on those issues.

    That’s just fine with former Florida House Speaker Allan Bense, who chairs the commission.

    “We will follow the Legislature’s lead,” said Bense, a Panama City Republican. “They are elected by the people; we are appointed.”

    The Legislature will try again during a June 12-22 special session called by House Speaker Marco Rubio, R-West Miami, and Senate President Ken Pruitt, R-Port St. Lucie.

    “I’m frankly happy that the Legislature chose to take their time,” Bense said. “That was a prudent move.”

    The Florida Constitution requires the commission to be formed this year and again every 20 years thereafter. It has the power to put proposed constitutional amendments on the ballot but also can make recommendations to the governor and Legislature. Its next meeting is May 18 in Tallahassee.

    Crist said he met with or called about 50 legislators over the weekend to discuss property taxes. He said he told them “We need to get this done.”

    Crist also has consulted with former Gov. Reubin Askew, who advised him not to worry that lawmakers failed to resolve it during the regular session because they could either get it done in special session or leave it to the constitutional commission.

    Bense said he wanted to wait and see what happens at the special session before discussing what the commission might do.

    “I never like to deal in what-ifs,” Bense said.

    AP LogoCopyright 2007 The Associated Press, Bill Kaczor, Associated Press Writer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 9th, 2007 11:20 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Passage of FHA reform bill would help homeowners and homebuyers, says NAR
    May 7th, 2007 2:41 PM
    Passage of FHA reform bill would help homeowners and homebuyers, says NAR

    WASHINGTON – May 7, 2007 – The U.S. House Financial Services Committee on Thursday passed legislation allowing the Federal Housing Administration to offer borrowers a safer alternative to risky mortgage products and to help many homeowners facing foreclosure.

    The National Association of Realtors® (NAR), a strong advocate of FHA modernization legislation, says the bill will bring about more stability to local real estate markets and economies.

    “FHA can once again be a leader in providing safe loan products and preventing foreclosures by authorizing lenders to assist borrowers who are in default,” says NAR President Pat V. Combs. “This ability will make a substantial difference for many families that may otherwise face foreclosure.”

    The legislation – called the Expanding American Homeownership Act of 2007 – would increase loan limits, eliminate the statutory 3 percent minimum cash down payment, and give FHA flexibility to provide risk-based pricing. The bill will next go before the full House of Representatives for a vote.

    What the bill would do

    NAR also supports the continued availability of FHA loss mitigation programs, which includes mortgage modifications that allow borrowers to change the terms of their mortgage so that they can afford to stay in their home. The program also offers “partial claim” programs through which FHA lends money to a borrower to cure a loan default. This no-interest loan is not due until the property is sold or paid off.

    “In 2004 alone, more than 78,000 people were able to retain their home through FHA’s loss mitigation program, and two years later nearly 90 percent of these families are still in their home,” Combs said. “That’s what I’d call really making a difference.”

    Boosting FHA mortgage loan limits will help first-time homebuyers, minority buyers, and others who cannot qualify for conventional mortgages, NAR officials noted. Increasing loan limits will also help people living in high cost areas because the current low FHA limits make FHA unusable in those areas. Eliminating the 3 percent minimum downpayment will also have positive results for many homebuyers.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS


    Posted by Don Suda on May 7th, 2007 2:41 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Citizens to freeze rates, spread risk upstate
    May 7th, 2007 2:40 PM
    Citizens to freeze rates, spread risk upstate

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 7, 2007 – The Legislature handed South Florida homeowners who buy coverage from Citizens Property Insurance a gift: no rate increase before 2009.

    The rate freeze was part of a large insurance bill approved by lawmakers on the final day of the Legislature’s regular session.

    A key provision among the more than 70 in this bill is the expansion of Citizens’ operations. No longer is the state-run company the insurer of last resort. It now can compete with private insurers in Florida.

    “The focus is to change the mission of Citizens to allow it to become profitable so those profits can be used in lieu of higher assessments,” said Sen. Rudy Garcia, a Hialeah Republican who sponsored the bill in the Senate.

    The measure had the backing of Gov. Charlie Crist, who sees a more competitive Citizens as a vehicle to lower rates. He’s hoping private insurers might tweak their rates down to keep from losing business to Citizens.

    “We put a nail in the coffin of the industry that was choking our people,” Crist said after lawmakers wrapped up their work Friday afternoon.

    Several House members vehemently opposed this insurance bill because Citizens can assess nearly all insurance policies in the state. Surcharges could be tacked onto auto and homeowner policies that aren’t with Citizens to make up deficits faced by the state-run insurer.

    “Floridians have a right to live anywhere they choose, but they don’t have a right to expect everyone else to fund their choice,” said Rep. Don Brown, R-DeFuniak Springs, head of the House Insurance Committee.

    Several representatives from North and Central Florida noted that Citizens’ policies are concentrated in coastal areas yet their constituents would be assessed. Indeed, half of Citizens’ 1.3 million policies are in South Florida.

    But Citizens says its recent growth has been upstate because private insurers are writing far fewer policies. Insurers contend they’re losing customers because rates at Citizens are lower.

    Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Lakeland, made one last attempt to require that only Citizens policyholders make up the company’s deficits.

    But at the end of the day, the House approved the bill with a 106-to-10 vote.

    “Leadership was telling us to vote our conscience,” said Rep. Julio Robaina of Miami, who sponsored the bill in the House.

    Miami Herald business writer Monica Hatcher contributed to this report.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 7th, 2007 2:40 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Florida’s free hurricane home inspections resume
    May 7th, 2007 2:39 PM
    Florida’s free hurricane home inspections resume

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 7, 2007 – Florida’s free hurricane inspection program has resumed, according to Florida Chief Financial Officer Alex Sink. HB 7057, passed during the legislative session that ended on Friday, made adjustments to the My Safe Florida Home (MSFH) program.

    The MSFH program allows Florida homeowners to sign up through its Web site for a free wind inspection designed to look for ways a home came be fortified, called mitigation, to prepare it for a hurricane. If the inspection teams find items that could be improved, the state will also provide matching funds, within limits, for every dollar the homeowner spends.

    More than 50,000 homeowners are already on the program’s waiting list and these homeowners should expect to be served by the end of the summer. Floridians on the waiting list who have not heard from a participating wind inspection firm by June 30, 2007, should contact the MSFH program’s toll-free helpline at (866) 513-6734.

    New applicants can also apply over the MSFH program’s Web site (www.MySafeFloridaHome.com) or over the program’s toll-free helpline at (866) 513-6734, but Sink says that the waiting list will be handled first, and anyone applying for the first time should not expect to receive a free wind inspection before August 2007.

    However, Floridians who want a wind inspection before hurricane season starts on June 1 – and don’t plan to apply for matching funds – can pay a $150 fee directly to the independent inspection firms participating in the program. More information on contacting an inspection firm can be found at www.MySafeFloridaHome.com.

    To date, the MSFH program has awarded about $200,000 to 88 Florida homeowners who hardened their homes against hurricanes through the MSFH program. The state reimbursed the homeowners, who received free wind inspections during the pilot phase of the program, for half the cost of home improvements, including hurricane shutters, reinforced garage doors and roof enhancements. More than 5,100 Floridians are currently working on mitigation improvements through the MSFH program and will receive their matching grants once the work has been completed.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®


    Posted by Don Suda on May 7th, 2007 2:39 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Immigration
    May 5th, 2007 11:28 AM
    Big banks’ loan push: Illegal immigrants

    NEW YORK – May 4, 2007 – Big banks are now following the lead of community banks in offering mortgages to illegal immigrants who lack Social Security numbers and traditional credit histories, instead allowing the use of Internal Revenue Service Tax Identification Numbers and employment histories.

    Loan programs from J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Fifth Third Bancorp are in the works; and a secondary market to sell and trade these mortgages is being created by Deutsche Bank AG in conjunction with the Hispanic National Mortgage Association.

    National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals President Timothy Sandos says the estimated 375,000 undocumented immigrant households could provide $85 billion or more in originations, adding that defaults are less likely to be a problem with these borrowers. According to Sandos, “Once they get a piece of the American dream, they will do any and everything to make sure that bill is taken care of because it is the only asset they’ve got.

    Source: Wall Street Journal (05/03/07) P. C1; Sidel, Robin


    © Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688

    Posted by Don Suda on May 5th, 2007 11:28 AMPost a Comment (0)

    First Impressions
    May 5th, 2007 11:27 AM
    This Sold House: How to get your digs up to snuff to sell

    SANTA ANA, Calif. – May 4, 2007 – Leaky faucets. Dirty carpets. Overgrown shrubs. Clutter.

    Sid Davis has seen it all. It’s the little stuff that home sellers refuse to fix before listing a home.

    Home shoppers see those flaws, and they either flee or they go into a “what else is wrong” mode, looking for defects that can knock as much as 10 percent off the price.

    Ignoring these details can result in long waits without an offer, or lowball offers when they do come, said Davis, a Salt Lake City real estate broker and author of the recent book “Home Makeovers That Sell.”

    Sellers have to do something to make their homes stand out from the competition, real estate and home staging professionals say. A home needs to be priced right and look its best if it’s going to attract a buyer.

    “You fix your home up and make it nice, it’s going to sell quick,” Davis said. “Otherwise, you’re going to look like a tarantula on a wedding cake.”

    Here are their top tips.

    Price it right:
    Pricing a home right is the most important strategy to selling a home quickly, said Davis and other real estate agents. Sellers need to look at how much comparable homes in the same neighborhood sold for within the past 30 days to be attuned to current market conditions, Davis said.

    For example, if neighboring homes of similar sizes and types sold for $600,000, don’t price it at $675,000, even if comparable properties fetched that price a year ago.

    “Pricing is vital,” said Barbara Delgleize, a broker with Keller Williams Realty in Huntington Beach, Calif., and a past president of the Orange County Association of Realtors. “Even a dog, if it’s priced right, will sell.”

    Fix ‘er up:
    Once homes are priced right, sellers must be willing to make repairs, spruce up landscaping, clean, paint and even remove items from their homes to win buyers’ attention, professionals said.

    “The way you live in a home and the way you market a home are two different things,” said Dan Keating of Coast Home Staging, president of the Orange County chapter of the International Association of Home Staging Professionals. “Most people don’t understand (that) when they put their house on the market,” he added. “They (need) to make it show like a model home.”

    Davis estimates that do-it-yourselfers could get their home ready to show for as little as $1,500 to $2,000, but the sky’s the limit for how much homeowners end up spending.

    Hiring painters to do the work could add $2,500 to that price. Installing new kitchen floors could cost $1,500 to $4,500, according to Davis’s book. New kitchen appliances could cost up to $2,800, he estimated. But if you’re careful and stick to upgrades that match other homes in your area, you should recover most, if not all, of your investment when you sell.

    Davis advises sellers to hire a home inspector to go through their residence and put together a checklist of problems to fix – everything from leaky faucets to socket covers and light fixtures. Sellers should save their receipts to use as a sales tool, he said.

    Declutter and clean: “You’d be surprised how many homes out there are messy, dirty and smell bad,” Davis said.

    Dishes need to be put away. Laundry needs to be folded.

    “You want your house to be white-glove clean,” Keating said. “Every nook and cranny. If a house looks well taken care of, buyers believe it’s well maintained.” Excess furniture and belongings should be packed up and put into storage.

    Anything that personalizes your home – photos, trophies, knickknacks or a golf-ball collection, for example – should be removed so your residence appeals to buyers with a wide variety of tastes. Keating’s wife and partner, Karen, noted that homeowners should want buyers to notice their house, not their belongings.

    Boost curb appeal:
    If the home and landscaping don’t look nice from the street, buyers won’t even get out of their cars, Davis and Keating said.

    “That’s where people make their first impression, and you don’t get a second chance,” Davis said.

    The lawn should be in perfect condition: fertilized, watered and mowed.

    Sellers should plant flowers, fix fences, prune bushes and shrubs so that they’re no higher than first-floor windowsills and remove dead plants.

    Bare dirt should be covered with bark.

    Keating said the front of the home should have a nice paint job, adding that some real estate agents recommend replacing dilapidated garage doors.

    Freshen the front door: The door needs to have fresh paint or stain, and the doorbell needs to be in good working order.

    “There’s nothing worse than going up to a front door and finding the doorbell hanging by the wires,” Davis said. “That’s the kiss of death.”

    Keep interiors spotless: The entrance hall has to be attractive, with flooring in good shape. Throw rugs and other floor coverings must be in excellent condition, cleaned or replaced, Davis said.

    The home must have a super paint job, with no dings, scratches or holes in the walls. Davis recommends light-colored paint since you want the home to be as neutral as possible. If your home has bright colors, paint it white, he said.

    “Nobody can criticize vanilla,” Davis said. “It’s the best-selling ice cream out there.”

    Kitchen and bath: The kitchen and bathroom are the most important rooms in your home and should look good, professionals say. According to Remodeling Magazine’s 2006 Cost vs. Value Report, homeowners typically get back 85 percent of what they spend on a minor kitchen remodeling job when they sell their home, and they recover 77 percent of their bathroom remodeling costs.

    Floors, appliances and countertops need to be in good condition. Davis recommends taking a floor tiling class at a home center and putting in a new tile floor in kitchens. Don’t install granite or other high-end countertops unless that’s common for homes in your neighborhood, he said.

    Old and dingy kitchen cabinets should be sanded and refinished or sanded and painted gloss white, he said.

    Bathroom fixtures must be in good condition and sparkling clean. The mirror should be replaced if it’s dingy, and the bathroom must have good lighting and an attractive shower curtain if one is used.

    “The smart money is in kitchens and bathrooms,” Davis said. “You can do all this for cheap.”

    Laundry and garage: Invest a small amount in making your washer-dryer area attractive. Buyers like clean, well-lighted laundry rooms, preferably with storage, nice flooring and fresh paint.

    Garages should be clutter free. Davis suggests having a garage sale or putting excess possessions into storage or in a storage shed until you move.

    “Nobody is going to do all this stuff,” Davis said. “This will put you ahead of the game.”

    © 2007, The Orange County Register (Santa Ana, Calif.), Jeff Collins. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune News Service.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 5th, 2007 11:27 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Mortgage Rates
    May 5th, 2007 11:26 AM
    30-year mortgage rates hold steady

    Mortgage Rate Trend Index

    This week, mortgage experts polled by Bankrate.com say, “Be patient.” Only 17 percent predict a rate increase over the next 30 to 45 days and 28 percent forecast a drop. The remaining 58 percent predict no change.

    WASHINGTON – May 4, 2007 – Rates on 30-year mortgages held steady this week near their low point for the year, reflecting the slowdown in economic growth.

    Mortgage giant Freddie Mac reported Thursday that 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.16 percent nationwide this week, unchanged from last week. That level is near the low for the year of 6.14 percent for 30-year mortgages in early March.

    Rates had fallen for two straight weeks before holding steady this week. Analysts said investors interpreted the recent report on economic growth as further evidence that the slowing economy will relieve pressures on inflation.

    The government reported that the overall economy, as measured by the gross domestic product, grew at a lackluster pace of 1.3 percent in the January-to-March quarter, the weakest performance in four years.

    Frank Nothaft, chief economist at Freddie Mac, said a report showing easing consumer prices outside of energy had also helped to relieve inflation worries in financial markets.

    Mortgage rates have been relatively stable over the past four months with the 30-year fluctuating in a narrow range that saw it go as high as 6.34 percent in early February and as low as 6.14 percent for the first two weeks in March.

    Other mortgage rates were basically steady this week as well, Freddie Mac reported.

    Rates on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, a popular choice for refinancing, were unchanged at 5.87 percent, the same as last week.

    Five-year adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 5.87 percent this week as well, compared to 5.88 percent last week.

    One-year adjustable rate mortgages edged down to 5.42 percent, compared to 5.43 percent last week.

    The mortgage rates do not include add-on fees known as points. Thirty-year and 15-year mortgages both carried a nationwide average fee of 0.5 point. Five-year adjustable-rate mortgages carried a 0.6 point and one-year ARMs carried an average fee of 0.7 point.

    A year ago, rates on 30-year mortgages stood at 6.59 percent while 15-year mortgages were at 6.22 percent. Five-year adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 6.21 percent and one-year adjustable-rate mortgages were at 5.67 percent.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 5th, 2007 11:26 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Foreclosures
    May 5th, 2007 11:25 AM
    Homeownership advocates say federal action is needed

    WASHINGTON – May 4, 2007 – As state lawmakers rush to reform lending practices that have contributed to a recent surge of mortgage defaults and foreclosures, consumer advocates say these efforts fall short of what is truly needed: a federal law protecting home buyers.

    The number of foreclosures nationally jumped 47 percent in March from a year ago, according to RealtyTrac Inc., a problem concentrated among borrowers with shaky credit who took out higher-priced loans.

    Amid fears that the distress in the so-called subprime lending market could spill over into the broader economy, some members of Congress are demanding reforms. But industry officials counter that increased scrutiny from regulators and investors has already triggered self-corrective measures, such as lenders demanding from borrowers more income verification and larger down payments.

    On Thursday, Senators Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio and Bob Casey, D-Pa., introduced a bill that would mandate tougher federal standards for mortgage lenders. They also advocated for greater public and private financing of consumer education programs aimed at helping homeowners avoid foreclosure.

    Any new laws from Congress are far from certain, however. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., says increased regulatory oversight and voluntary actions by lenders are preferable to a government bailout. Dodd announced this week that several major participants in the mortgage market, including Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and HSBC Holdings Corp., agreed to adopt a set of principles for dealing with homeowners who face possible foreclosure.

    Kurt Pfotenhauer, senior vice president for government affairs at the Mortgage Bankers Association, called Dodd’s approach “responsible, thoughtful and forceful.” A taxpayer-financed bailout plan doesn’t make sense, he said, because “the mortgage finance industry is already stepping up to help those borrowers.”

    Determining what Congress should do is complicated by a lack of consensus about how much impact the subprime market’s troubles may have on the economy.

    Steven Wieting, senior economist with Citigroup, said tighter lending standards should result in lower levels of home sales in the coming years. He does not believe the mortgage market’s troubles will hamper the economy in the short term.

    As defaults rise, credit agencies Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s have in recent weeks downgraded or placed under review bonds backed by risky mortgages, particularly second mortgages that borrowers have used to finance 100 percent of a home’s value.

    Moody’s predicted last week that investor losses on subprime mortgage bonds issued last year would likely be bigger than expected, as many borrowers will soon face higher – and unaffordable - interest rates at the end of their initial fixed-rate periods.

    Christopher Thornberg, principal with Beacon Economics in Los Angeles, said the credit rating agencies should have been far more skeptical. “These things should have been rated as risky a long time ago,” he said.

    At the state level, lawmakers and government officials have been responding quickly to the mortgage market’s troubles. There are more than 100 bills either introduced or already passed to deal with lending abuses and foreclosures, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

    “The states are more nimble and more responsive to unfair practices,” said Ed Mierzwinski, a consumer advocate with the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.” They’ve proven it time and time again.”

    Minnesota is trying to lessen the impact by spending $11 million to acquire foreclosed properties and reselling them to people with low incomes. Massachusetts is asking lenders to delay foreclosures for consumers who have filed complaints with state banking regulators. And Colorado lawmakers are considering a consumer protection bill that makes mortgage brokers responsible for pushing borrowers into loans they cannot afford.

    Ohio has attracted attention for a new program, to be funded by the sale of $100 million in bonds, to help around 1,000 homeowners refinance their loans into traditional 30-year fixed rate mortgages. Doug Garver, executive director of the state-run Ohio Housing Finance Agency, said that demand for the program is expected to be high, but noted that his agency has limited funding capacity.

    “We’re not the sole answer to the problem in Ohio,” he said.

    One potential hindrance for states, some of which have spent years modifying mortgage lending regulations, is last month’s Supreme Court decision that the federal government is the sole regulator of national bank subsidiaries. The decision could push more banks to become regulated nationally, rather than by states, some experts say.

    Housing advocates who have long pushed for a nationwide law banning “predatory” practices such as excessive mortgage fees and penalties for early mortgage payments see the current crisis in the mortgage industry as the best opportunity in years for a national law.

    John Taylor, president of the Washington-based National Community Reinvestment Coalition, said an absence of predatory lending laws at the federal level helped create the mortgage market’s troubles, which should provide Congress with “crystal-clear evidence” that reforms are needed.

    “What we need to do is create the kinds of consumer protections that will prevent us from getting into a situation like this in the future,” he said.

    AP LogoCopyright 2007 The Associated Press, Alan Zibel (AP Business Writer). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 5th, 2007 11:25 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Property Insurance
    May 5th, 2007 11:23 AM
    Property insurance: Legislators made is easier for certain property owners to obtain insurance from Citizens Property Insurance Corp. and raised the ante for others. Citizens, the state’s insurer of last resort, is now Florida’s largest insurer with 1.3 million policyholders.  SB 2498 by South Florida Sen. Rudy Garcia (R) would allow property owners into the Citizens pool if the only insurance they could obtain on the private market was 15 percent more expensive than what they would pay Citizens. The current threshold is 25 percent. The measure would also prevent private insurance companies from setting off their Florida operations in a separate, Florida-only company (known as PUP companies), and freeze Citizens rates through 2008; effective Jan. 1, 2009, Citizens would again be allowed to raise rates. Legislation passed during the special session on insurance last January freezes rates through the end of 2008.

    Another bill, HB 7057 by Rep. Trey Traviesa (R-Tampa) , requires homes valued at over $750,000 and located in high-risk zones to install opening protections effective July 1, 2008, if they seek a building permit for work estimated at $50,000 or more. By Jan. 1, 2009, all homes valued at over $750,000 in high-risk zones must be fitted with opening protections to remain eligible for property insurance coverage through Citizens. The goal is to “harden” homes insured by Citizens (which all policyholders in Florida support financially), thereby helping reduce some of the risk in the event of a devastating storm. The plan also calls for free inspections of 400,000 single-family homes and provides grants and loan to certain homeowners so they can make improvements that strengthen their home against storms.

    Housing trust funds. More of the money generated by a portion of documentary stamp taxes for the William E. Sadowski Affordable Housing Trust Funds will be allocated to state and local programs. The state budget provides $393.4 million for housing programs — down from $433 million set aside last year but still $150 million more the cap imposed by the 2005 Legislature. Unfortunately, legislators failed to remove the $243 million cap on the funds, a move sought by affordable housing advocates, including FAR, citing a lean budget year.

    On a related note, lawmakers approved HB 1375 by Rep. Mike Davis (R-Naples) , a long-time advocate of full funding of housing trust funds and other statewide affordable housing programs. Among other things, HB 1375 would require local governments to adopt by July 1, 2008 a workforce/affordable housing plan into the local comprehensive plan. Failure to do so would prevent the local government from receiving state housing grants.

    More staff positions at the Division of Real Estate. The state budget also appropriates money for seven new employees at the Division — four full-time and three part-time. This should go a long way toward improving services to Realtors and protecting the public.

    Also approved this session:
    SB 2234 by Sen. Steve Wise (R-Jacksonville), which requires home inspectors, mold remediators and mold assessors to be licensed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Effective July 1, 2010, if signed by the governor.
    HB 1277 by Rep. Pat Patterson (R-DeLand), which limits the financial penalty a landlord can collect when a tenant breaks a lease to two months of rent. The bill only affects leases of less than a year. Effective immediately if the governor signs it.
    HB 7163 by Rep. Carlos Lopez-Cantera (R-Miami) which allows real estate licensees to earn 3 hours of CE credit for attending a Florida Real Estate Commission meeting. Effective immediately if the governor signs it.

    SB 1824 by Sen. Mike Fasano (R-New Port Richey) , which places numerous disclosure and education requirements on mortgage brokers and lenders to help protect consumers during the mortgage loan application process. More importantly, the bill includes additional enforcement and investigative tools for prosecuting mortgage fraud. Effective Oct. 1, 2007, if signed by the governor.
    HB 111 by Rep. Bill Galvano (R-Bradenton) , amends the definition of “primary title services” and “related title services,” and codifies a civil court case that permits a portion of a title insurance premium to be rebated. Effective Oct. 1, 2007, if signed by the governor.

    **********************************************************


    Posted by Don Suda on May 5th, 2007 11:23 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Property tax relief
    May 5th, 2007 11:22 AM
    Legislature 2007

    TALLAHASSEE –- May 4, 2007 – 4:13 p.m. –- Let’s start with the issue most on your mind: property tax relief.

    By now you’ve no doubt learned that the Legislature suspended negotiations on Save Our Homes portability, rollbacks and other property tax reform proposals until next month when lawmakers return to Tallahassee for a 10-day special session.

    Several words come to mind.

    Disappointing? Yes.

    Derailed? No.

    “We’re going home to continue to work on it,” said House Speaker Marco Rubio (R-Miami). “We would not call dates (for a special session)...unless we were confident that we would come up with something that would not just pass but work. But drafting something to go on the ballot (can't be rushed).''

    House and Senate leaders called the special session Wednesday afternoon when it became clear that a deal couldn’t be worked out in the remaining 48 hours of the regular session. "The issue is too important to our state and to our taxpayers for us to give them a product they would not be proud of," said Senate President Ken Pruitt (R-Port St. Lucie) . "We have laid a great foundation."

    Pruitt noted that both sides have already agreed on two FAR-supported tax relief measures—$25,000 exemption on personal intangible property for small businesses and some form of Save Our Homes portability. Details of the portability discussions were not released.

    30 days to talk the talk
    A one-month waiting period leading to a special session of the Florida Legislature gives Realtors an opportunity to meet their lawmakers locally and push for substantial property tax relief. It also gives lawmakers time to consider the focus exclusively on the issue.

    “It is my hope that a special legislative session devoted entirely to this issue will be able to deliver even more comprehensive tax reform than what could be negotiated in the waning hours of the regular session,” says FAR President Nancy Riley. “The Legislature will be able to roll back rates immediately and, if we remain strong, we will get our special election this year for portability and other constitutional issues that must be ratified by the voters.”

    Special session at a glance:
    When: June 12-22

    Original House plan: Rollback taxes to 2001 levels; replace property taxes with a 2.5 percent state sales tax increase (constitutional amendment. Projected savings: $50 billion over five years.

    Original Senate plan: Rollback taxes to 2006 levels; allow for Save Our Homes portability; $25,000 exemption on intangible property; double the homestead exemption for first-time buyers. Projected saving: $14 billion.

    What sources say has been agreed to so far: Cut property taxes by about $20-25 billion over five years; no sales tax increase; some form of Save Our Homes portability.



    Posted by Don Suda on May 5th, 2007 11:22 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Soft market? Don't tell developments' planners
    May 4th, 2007 1:18 PM

    Soft market? Don't tell developments' planners

    By PAUL SWIDER
    Published May 2, 2007


    Though the housing market is still stalled, planning for new commercial and mixed-use developments continues with a new proposal being floated just north of downtown.

    "The lull is exclusive to residential, " said David Dunbar, CEO of Synovus Bank of Tampa Bay, which is about to sell its property at Fourth Street and Third Avenue N to Miles Development for a new complex. "Commercial development hasn't slowed at all."

    The deal hasn't yet closed and Miles is still performing its due diligence, but the Atlanta firm with a taste for St. Petersburg already has some ideas for the block. Jason Perry, the company's vice president of development, said he anticipates three phases of building: 1 a 12-15-story office building, 130-room hotel and a parking garage to connect them on the north of the property; 2) an upscale urban grocery store on the southeast corner; and 3) a rehab or reconstruction of the existing bank building on the southwest corner as either more office space or possibly condominiums.

    "It's very much in pencil right now, " Perry said. "But we really love that site, been watching it for some time now."

    Perry said the first phase could be completed within two to three years, but the rest is further out. Still, the planning mirrors that of other recent announcements that show developers are sharpening their pencils for what they see as an attractive downtown market.

    Last week Jimmy Aviram and Tibor Hollo discussed plans to build nearly 1-million square feet of hotel, condo and shopping in two towers on the Tropicana block at Second Street and Central Avenue.

    Mansion by the Bay on Fourth Avenue N may soon be replaced by a 21-story condo project that goes to the Environmental Development Commission today.

    And Fuel Group International will appear before the EDC on May 16 seeking approval for a 32-story hotel and condo building on Fifth Avenue and First Street NE.

    "St. Pete will attract the comeback faster than anywhere else, " Dunbar said. "No other city has its assets and any developer can see that."

    Dunbar said he didn't need to sell the property but it was underutilized and he wanted Synovus to be part of a showcase project on the site. The first-phase office building will likely be named Synovus Bank Tower and continue to house the bank's wealth management and commercial operations. Synovus is also building a corporate headquarters for senior management and a new branch on Roosevelt Boulevard and 28th Street.

    The new Miles development will be an early foray into north downtown, an area with more plans than action the last few years.

    "There hasn't been a whole lot of development near that site, " Perry said. "But that's the Miles MO, to be somewhat pioneering."

    Miles recently opened its 114-unit 1010 Central project, a condo building well west of hotter development areas. It is nearing completion of The Sage, a 112-unit project southwest of downtown. In August, the company will break ground on a 159-unit apartment building at 1701 Central next to Interstate 275.

    Perry said the company remains very interested in the city and is interested in larger projects like the estimated $170-million Synovus concept.

    He has land to choose from. The 3.7 acres near Harborage Marina that was to be Windward is for sale, as is the 1.6 acres that were to be CitySide at Third Avenue N and Eighth Street. Land slated for LaVista is also for sale at Third Avenue N and Fifth Street, and a 2-acre parcel set to be the Edge is for sale at Fourth Avenue S and Fourth Street. "We're still looking for opportunities, " Perry said. "We're very bullish on St. Pete."

    Paul Swider can be reached at 892-2271 or pswider@sptimes.com or by participating in itsyourtimes.com .


    Posted by Don Suda on May 4th, 2007 1:18 PMPost a Comment (0)

    WORTH A MILLION
    May 4th, 2007 1:17 PM
    WORTH A MILLION

    The number of U.S. millionaire households has risen to a record high of 9.3 million as of mid-2006, up 5 percent from 2005, according to TNS Global’s annual Affluent Market Research Program. The millionaires’ mean net worth, not including their primary residence, is $2,167,167 with investable assets of $1,442,841. Their median age is 58 and 45 percent are retired. Forty-six percent own investment real estate, such as a second home, third home, rental properties and undeveloped land. Thirty-four percent have a first mortgage on these residences and 25 percent have second mortgages on these additional residences. The TNS study identified 10 counties with the highest number of millionaire residents: Ranking No. 1 is Los Angeles County with 268,136; No. 2, Cook County, Ill. (171,118); No. 3, Orange County, Calif. (116,157); No. 4, Maricopa County, Ariz. (113,414); No. 5, San Diego County, Calif. (102,138); No. 6. Harris County, Texas (99,504); No. 7, Nassau County, N.Y. (79,704); No. 8, Santa Clara County, Calif., (74,824); No. 9, Palm Beach County, Fla. (71,221); and No. 10, King County, Ore. (68,390).

    Source: Associated Press (05/01/07)
    © Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688

    **********************************************************


    Posted by Don Suda on May 4th, 2007 1:17 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Industrial property demand falls
    May 4th, 2007 1:15 PM
    Industrial property demand falls

    BOSTON – May 3, 2007 – The industrial real estate market posted a shaky first quarter in 2007, with absorption considerably below anticipated levels, according to a report by Colliers International, the global real estate services firm. Even though demand for industrial space fell far short of expectations, rents managed a small increase during the first quarter.

    First quarter absorption was disappointing, with occupied space increasing by just 27.3 million square feet, compared with 36.9 million square feet in fourth quarter 2006. Industrial absorption totaled 40 million square feet in the year-ago quarter. In addition, contrary to expectations, first quarter industrial construction completions also came in below expected levels, keeping the rise in vacancy to just four basis points.

    “Despite a slow start, it’s too early to sound the alarm,” remarked Ross Moore, senior vice president and director of market and economic research at Colliers International.  “The underlying economy, with the exception of the housing sector, continues to register measured growth, which we believe will eventually help bolster the warehouse leasing market.”

    Just a handful of markets (13 percent) are forecasting demand to drop in the current quarter, with the vast majority anticipating leasing markets to either remain steady or expand.

    For more information, go to: http://www.colliers.com/Markets/USA/News/Q107Industrial

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

    Posted by Don Suda on May 4th, 2007 1:15 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Several players in home mortgage market agree on principles for borrowers in trouble
    May 4th, 2007 1:14 PM
    Several players in home mortgage market agree on principles for borrowers in trouble

    WASHINGTON – May 3, 2007 – Several major participants in the home mortgage market have agreed to adopt a set of principles for dealing with homeowners with high-priced loans who face possible foreclosure, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee said Wednesday.

    Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., had urged such voluntary action by mortgage lenders and other players two weeks ago when he convened a meeting of their officials and federal regulators to discuss possible solutions to the crisis gripping the market for high-risk loans. Such industry initiatives are preferable, in Dodd’s view, to any government bailout to cover mortgage loans in default.

    Those agreeing to the principles include the Mortgage Bankers Association; Wall Street powerhouses Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. HSBC Holdings Corp. and Bear Stearns & Co.; government-sponsored mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; AARP; and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. Several activist and community groups receive money from financial institutions and work with homeowners to refinance high-rate loans.

    Among the principles are: contacting distressed borrowers promptly to try to work out arrangements; making loans more affordable by reducing rates, changing terms and other means; and providing refinancing at the lowest cost possible for those who are eligible.

    “These principles represent a critical step in preserving homeownership and economic opportunity,” Dodd said in a statement. “The companies and organizations that endorse these principles demonstrate their commitment to being part of finding solutions to foreclosures.”

    Some companies that participated in the April 18 meeting, however, including Countrywide Financial Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co., did not endorse the principles.

    Home-mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures have surged in recent months, especially for people who took out subprime mortgages - higher-priced loans for people with tarnished credit or low incomes who are considered greater risks. The distress has roiled financial markets and stoked anxiety that it could spill over into the broader economy.

    Especially precarious are the millions of adjustable-rate mortgages, known as ARMs, which are prevalent in the subprime market. They are considered higher-risk loans because they typically draw borrowers in with an initial low “teaser” interest rate, which can spike upward after the first few years.

    Nearly 2 million ARMs are resetting to higher rates this year and next, setting up a potential wave of foreclosures that has put policymakers on edge.

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two biggest players in the $8 trillion home-mortgage market, recently committed to buy tens of billions of dollars of high-interest mortgages so that lenders can help strapped borrowers refinance and avoid foreclosure.

    AP LogoCopyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Marcy Gordon (AP Business Writer). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


    Posted by Don Suda on May 4th, 2007 1:14 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Senate approve expansion of Florida-backed insurer
    May 4th, 2007 1:13 PM
    Senate approve expansion of Florida-backed insurer

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 3, 2007 – State senators unanimously approved a bill Wednesday that would allow the state-run insurer to expand its operations and freeze its rates through 2008.

    These lawmakers – including the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Rudy Garcia of Hialeah – had been expecting easy passage when the House takes up the measure today.

    But with just two days left in the regular session to deal with the state’s burgeoning insurance crisis, two proposed last-minute changes to the Senate bill could bog down its forward movement with renewed debate about the wisdom of letting Citizens Property Insurance become more competitive.

    Also Wednesday, the Senate passed the House version of a bill that expands the state’s hurricane mitigation program. Changes made Wednesday to the bill require shutters on homes with an insured value of more than $750,000 and when more than $50,000 of remodeling work is being done. It would also require strengthening roofs with straps or attachments when roof rebuilding is done on homes insured for more than $300,000. This bill now goes to the governor’s desk. On the bill that would expand Citizens, an amendment filed by Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Lakeland, would require Citizens to look to its own policyholders to build adequate surplus and cover any shortfalls if the company ran out of funds to pay claims.

    “Citizens should be on an even playing field with other insurers. It should look to its own assets and policyholders,” said Ross, explaining the rationale behind his proposed change.

    Ross and a handful of other representatives have consistently expressed concern about expanding Citizens and letting the company turn to all policyholders – auto, home and commercial property – to cover losses for the state company if its reserves aren’t sufficient to cover claims if a big storm hits Florida.

    Citizens now is the largest insurer of homes, condos and apartments in the state with nearly 1.3 million policies on its books. As a result of a massive insurance bill passed in January during a week-long special session, it will expand its commercial insurance business in September.

    Another late amendment proposed by Rep. Alan D. Hays, R-Umatilla, would establish a task force to develop a plan to take Citizens back to its original mission – a noncompetitive insurer of last resort. Until last year, Citizens had been required by law to charge rates above the 20 largest private insurers. That requirement deterred homeowners from voluntarily choosing Citizens for coverage unless they had no other options.

    The bill as approved by the Senate would allow homeowners to choose a Citizens policy if their coverage by a private insurer is at least 15 percent higher than the state-run company. It would continue the rate freeze until 2008. And it would prevent the formation of more Florida-only subsidiaries for the national insurance companies and would require current subsidiaries operating in this state to include their parent companies’ profits in rate filings here.

    This bill has the backing of Gov. Charlie Crist, who believes that giving Citizens the ability to compete more readily with private insurance firms would eventually lead to lower insurance rates. Crist is betting that private insurers might be inclined to nudge their rates down to keep from losing policyholders to Citizens.

    Garcia had been happy with the Citizens bill as it was sent to the House Wednesday afternoon. But he’s now worried these amendments “gut the bill.”

    “It would continue to help the insurance industry and not the consumers of Florida,” Garcia said, adding he’s not sure the Senate would take up an amended bill after having approved it once.

    However, Ross isn’t sure he has all the votes to get his amendments adopted by his fellow House members.

    “Only two representatives voted against the special session bill. I hope to at least double that number tomorrow,” said Ross late Wednesday. He was referring to Rep. Don Brown’s vote and his own vote against the massive insurance bill passed in January after a week of negotiations.

    Copyright (c) 2007 The Miami Herald, Beatrice E. Garcia. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

    Posted by Don Suda on May 4th, 2007 1:13 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Realtors note advantages to tax reform’s special session
    May 4th, 2007 1:11 PM
    Realtors note advantages to tax reform’s special session

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 3, 2007 – Realtors want property tax reform as soon as possible – yesterday would have been great – but they also want it done right, and a one-month waiting period leading to a special session of the Florida Legislature gives lawmakers time to consider the complicated issue. It also gives Realtors an opportunity to meet their lawmakers locally and push for positive and substantial change. Everyone agrees that it’s important to get it right the first time, notably since some changes would have to go to voters as a proposed constitutional amendment.

    “While I am disappointed the Legislature didn’t finalize the property tax reform plan during the regular session, the 30 days they will be home before the June special session allows us even more time to make our voices heard,” says Florida Association of Realtors® President Nancy Riley. “It is my hope that a special legislative session devoted entirely to this issue will be able to deliver even more comprehensive tax reform than what could be negotiated in the waning hours of the regular session. The Legislature will be able to roll back rates immediately and, if we remain strong, we will get our special election this year for portability and other constitutional issues that must be ratified by the voters.”

    The personal lobbying efforts of Realtors could be vitally important. Once in their home districts, FAR expects local governments to lobby strongly for limits to property tax reform, fearing cuts to local spending would run too deep. Riley is encouraging local boards, associations and individual members to be proactive during May and early June, keeping political leaders focused on the need for significant reform.

    While many details still need to be worked out, however, a number of Realtor-supported changes already appear to be part of any final package. Both chambers, for example, support a tangible personal property exemption, probably $25,000, for businesses. And Senate President Ken Pruitt (R-Port St. Lucie) has suggested that there’s a tentative general agreement on some type of property tax portability.

    The special session will be held June 12-22.

    Other bills that advanced in Tallahassee include:

    Hurricane shutters

    HB 7057, passed by the Senate and sent back to the House, requires some Citizens Property Insurance customers to get hurricane shutters to keep their policy. The rule would apply to homeowners with at least $750,000 in insurance who live in high-wind areas, mostly along the coast.

    Ballot initiatives

    FAR successfully backed a constitutional amendment requiring a 60 percent majority of voters to approve any constitutional change. This year, the Legislature wants to tighten the process a bit more. The House passed SB 900 82-35, which requires petition signatures to be turned into supervisors of elections within 30 days of the signing; allows petition signers to revoke their signature within 150 days; and requires paid petition gatherers to identify themselves as non-volunteers by wearing an identification badge. Since the House added an amendment to the bill, it must now go back to the Senate for a vote.

    Home inspector bill

    The House yesterday made a minor change to SB 2234, a bill that would require home inspectors, mold remediators and mold assessors to be licensed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, setting the stage for a final vote in the Senate.

    Condominium law

    SB 314 by Sen. Steve Geller (D-Hallandale Beach), which seeks to enable condos to be sold with an 80 percent approval of owners, was approved by the full Legislature and is now on its way to the governor. Current law calls for unanimous consent from all individual condo owners before a condo association can be dissolved, which could be necessary following a major disaster that destroys a building in a hurricane. Following 1992’s Hurricane Andrew, for example, buildings were destroyed beyond repair but owners, forced to evacuate, could not be found, making it almost impossible to achieve a 100 percent approval to dissolve the condo association.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

    Posted by Don Suda on May 4th, 2007 1:11 PMPost a Comment (0)

    Condo Saturation Soaks Developers
    May 3rd, 2007 9:47 AM

    Condo Saturation Soaks Developers

    Published: May 1, 2007

    TAMPA - Condos For Sale. The loud signs flaunted from street corners across the Bay area are meant to grab the attention of potential buyers.

    Developers advertise slashed prices and promise flat-screen TVs and computers. They put up inflatable gorillas and even pay people to dress as superheroes at busy intersections.

    All the hype hasn't worked.

    The white-hot trend to change apartments into condominiums has long passed, and developers that overestimated the demand have found themselves with half-empty complexes. Some that tried converting them back into apartments aregrappling with foreclosure. Others are turning in their keys, leaving the lenders with unwanted residential properties they're trying to sell themselves.

    For individual buyers who purchased condominium units, they now must deal with uncertain property values and a less-than-promised quality of life: living in the middle of a sparsely filled complex where the majority of their neighbors rent.

    Eddie Flom, who has worked with developers on conversion projects in the Tampa Bay area, sums up the situation in one word: greed.

    "It's the oldest thing in the American economy," said Flom, of Flom Equities LLC. "Greed, greed, greed overcomes wisdom."

    Apartment-to-condominium conversions started locally in the late 1990s and heated up in late 2004 as some developers saw a way to get around high land costs and offer more affordable homes. Units at some apartment complexes, particularly the higher-end ones, sold out quickly.

    A handful of developers made so much money, Flom said, that others took notice and jumped onboard. Some of the less experienced developers paid too much for the land and couldn't sell condos for enough to make a profit. "People were trying to make a quick buck off the boom," he said. "Now Tampa is in complete saturation mode."

    By 2005, the conversions led to a shortage of apartments as 18,000 rental units were turned into condos, and the occupancy rate at the remaining apartment complexes swelled to 98 percent, according to commercial real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield.

    During the same year, 68 apartment complexes were purchased for conversion in the Bay area, up from 11 in 2004, according to New York-based Real Capitol Analytics, which tracks real estate trends. The conversion craze dropped off just as quickly as it heated up. In 2006, 25 complexes were sold for conversion. So far this year, there have been zero.

    "It's going to take at least a couple of years to burn off all the supply we have," said Dan Fasulo, a company spokesman.

    Some Lenders In A Jam

    Developers aren't the only ones feeling the pain. In some cases, lenders are on the hook for loans on complexes where sales have been slim.

    At CrossWynde Condominiums, an apartment conversion on U.S. 301 near Brandon, 60 percent of the 453 units are owned by the lender, Mountain Funding LLC of Charlotte, N.C., according to county property records.

    The developer, Boca Raton-based Bay Communities, bought the complex and one other in Tampa, The Hamptons at Tampa Palms. Sales were slow, and the developer tried to lease the unsold units. In December, as both complexes headed toward foreclosure, Bay Communities sold them back to the lender for the mortgage amount.

    Arthur Nevid, managing director for Mountain Funding, said the lender plans to hold the complex until the real estate market turns around. In the meantime, he said, it has hired a marketing and sales team to sell what it can and lease the rest.

    "The market was real hot, and then it hit a wall very quickly," Nevid said. "Two years ago you'd sell 10 units in a day. Now if you sell 10 in a month you've had a good month."

    Sales are picking up some, though, he said, citing 13 purchases at CrossWynde in the past three weeks. Nevid said his company, a private lender, is in a good position to hang on to the properties because it has real estate experience. Traditional banks, he said, are more likely to auction off failed conversions.

    In Pinellas County, lenders have begun foreclosure on three complexes purchased for conversion, Seaside Villas, Shore Club Pasadena and South Pasadena.

    The developers planned to remodel the waterfront complexes and even have pending contracts from some buyers. Construction at all three complexes has halted.

    Wachovia Investment Holdings LLC and Fremont Investment & Loan claim the developers defaulted on $90 million in mortgages.

    It's difficult to pinpoint how many apartment-to-condominium conversion complexes have gone into foreclosure because public records classify complexes as either "condominium" or "apartment" and don't show which condos used to be apartments.

    Mike Kane, chief executive of ForeclosuresDaily.com, said his company's data show hefty foreclosure increases for apartment complexes.

    In January, there were 286 apartment complexes in foreclosure, up 267 percent from 78 in January 2006.

    Some See Market's Potential

    The misfortune of some developers could be an opportunity for others. As some try to unload properties to avoid foreclosure, companies such as The Cypress Co. LLC in St. Petersburg are waiting on the sidelines.

    Blake Whitney Thompson, vice president and general counsel for Cypress, is looking into buying distressed properties, including conversion complexes, and holding them until they'll sell for a profit.

    Thompson said he has hired Flom, the conversion consultant, and is considering buying a few area condo conversion complexes.

    But, he said, he doesn't want to get into the same dead-end situation that some of the other developers are in. So he's picky.

    Some developers going into foreclosure are in a bad spot, Thompson said. They can't simply convert the whole complex back into apartments and then sell the property because individuals now own some units. Another problem, he said, is condominium bylaws require developers to keep property in good condition and to set aside a reserve for future expenses such as a new roof.

    "I won't buy a partially converted project without working it out with the lender," he said. "And I won't buy unless we can hold on to it for 10 years. You cannot forecast when this market is coming back."

    The slow market hasn't been bad for everyone. With prices dropping on conversions, more buyers have been able to afford a home, said Jim Bobbitt, senior vice president at commercial real estate firm CB Richard Ellis.

    "With single-family home prices skyrocketing, it's helped people who want affordable, maintenance-free living," Bobbitt said.

    Although the trend squeezed some renters out of apartments a few years ago, it's helping them now. Converted condos for rent are plentiful, leaving renters in a good position to negotiate a deal.

    Amanda Gates, for example, knew her landlord bought three condos at CrossWynde and needed tenants fast. He wanted $850 a month for the one-bedroom condo. Gates and her husband talked him down to $700.

    "We knew he didn't have anyone else," Gates said. "And price was very important to us. We're just starting out."

    Reporter Shannon Behnken can be reached at (813) 259-7804 or sbehnken @tampatrib.com.


    Posted by Don Suda on May 3rd, 2007 9:47 AMPost a Comment (0)

    HOME ALONE
    May 3rd, 2007 9:45 AM

    HOME ALONE

    The number of homes empty and for sale rose for the tenth straight quarter to a record rate of 2.8 percent, the U.S. Census Bureau reported last week. The number has been climbing steadily since the fourth quarter of 2004, when it stood at 1.8 percent, says William O'Donnell, U.S. government bond strategist at UBS Securities. "This is more pressure on the housing market and shows that the path to recovery is going to be that much longer," he says. "We just think it speaks volumes for the speculative nature of the housing market." The homeowner vacancy rate tracks the share of homes that are for sale but unoccupied.

    Source: Reuters News (04/27/2007)
    © Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688


    Posted by Don Suda on May 3rd, 2007 9:45 AMPost a Comment (0)

    ‘Moral hazard’ helps shape mortgage mess
    May 3rd, 2007 9:44 AM
    ‘Moral hazard’ helps shape mortgage mess

    NORTH PALM BEACH, Fla. – May 2, 2007 – The concept known as “moral hazard” will be important to understand as Congress, regulators and lenders address the aftermath of shaky mortgage lending.

    Today’s subprime meltdown, and tomorrow’s bigger Alt-A debacle, will bring out a lot of politicians who will demand that something be done to protect consumers from bad loans. But it’s going to be hard to protect consumers without bailing out the lenders and investors who were behind those bad loan decisions. That’s where moral hazard comes in.

    Moral hazard is an economic and insurance term that describes how people behave recklessly when they’re insured or protected in some way. If you sell flood insurance, people will build on flood plains. If you make airbags and anti-lock brakes standard in all cars, people will drive faster and tailgate more closely. If you introduce fat-free cookies (fat-free but still loaded with calories), people will eat more cookies than before, and get just as fat.

    All examples of moral hazard.

    Passing the risk

    In the last four years or so, mortgage standards became lax because each link in the mortgage chain collected profits while believing it was passing on risk to the next link in the chain. Brokers weren’t lending their own money, so they were pushing risks onto the lenders. Lenders sold mortgages soon after underwriting them, pushing the risk onto investors. Investment banks bought the mortgages and chopped up mortgage-backed securities into slices, with some slices being less risky and other slices being more risky. Investors bought securities and hedged against the risk of default and prepayment, pushing those risks further along.

    All of these businesses accepted profits and tried to leave the next guy vulnerable to risk. Participants thought they were insulated from the negative consequences of bad decisions. That’s an example of moral hazard.

    Government help as bailout

    Here’s another example of moral hazard: Using government money to help homeowners who are stuck in unsuitable loans and can’t afford their house payments. If not done carefully, this type of aid would subsidize lending institutions that made poor choices. It would bail out the investors who bought risky loans and now don’t want to suffer the consequences of losing their bets.

    As for the borrowers who lose their homes in foreclosure: Let this be a cautionary tale. Read your loan documents. Ask questions. If you don’t understand, hire a lawyer or a certified public accountant to give advice.

    Few people hire lawyers or CPAs to review their loan documents now. But 40 years ago, few people wore seatbelts. People have wised up since then.

    © 2007 Bankrate.com, Bankrate Inc. All rights reserved.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 3rd, 2007 9:44 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Pending home sales indicate near-term softness
    May 3rd, 2007 9:42 AM
    Pending home sales indicate near-term softness

    WASHINGTON – May 2, 2007 – The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator, shows sales closed in April are likely to remain soft, with some drag possible in May as well, according to the National Association of Realtors® (NAR).

    The Pending Home Sales Index, based on contracts signed in March, registered 104.3 – down 10.5 percent from March 2006 when it was 116.5, and is 4.9 percent below an upwardly revised February index of 109.7. The index is the lowest since a reading of 103.5 in March 2003, coincidentally, the middle of the housing boom.

    David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, expected the decline. “Although the weather improved in March, we’re starting to see the effects of a decline in subprime lending and tighter lending standards,” he said. “Home sales will be relatively sluggish in the second quarter, but a modest uptrend should resume during the second half of this year.  

    “We’re fortunate to have a positive economic backdrop now with job growth and low mortgage interest rates to provide opportunities for buyers who’ve been on the sidelines or were unable to get into the market during the boom, especially with inventories favoring buyers.”

    The index is a leading indicator for the housing sector, based on pending sales of existing homes. A sale is listed as pending when the contract has been signed but the transaction has not closed, though the sale usually is finalized within one or two months of signing.

    An index of 100 is equal to the average level of contract activity during 2001, the first year to be examined as well as the first of five consecutive record years for existing-home sales. There is a closer relationship between annual changes in the index and actual market performance than with month-to-month comparisons. As the relatively new index matures and seasonal adjustment factors are refined, the month-to-month comparisons will become more meaningful over time.

    The PHSI in the West rose 1.6 percent in March to 104.0 but was 8.6 percent below a year ago. The index in the Northeast fell 4.9 percent from February to 94.2 and was 14.0 percent below March 2006. The index in the Midwest dropped 6.9 percent in March to 95.9 and was 9.5 percent lower than a year earlier. In the South, the index fell 7.1 percent from February to 115.2 and was 10.6 percent below March 2006.

    © 2007 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

    Posted by Don Suda on May 3rd, 2007 9:42 AMPost a Comment (0)

    FAR study: Commercial activity strong in state
    May 3rd, 2007 9:40 AM
    FAR study: Commercial activity strong in state

    ORLANDO, Fla. – May 2, 2007 – The 2006 price tag for commercial activity in Florida: $18 billion, or 6 percent of the nation’s transaction volume, according to a 15-page state research study commissioned by the Florida Association of Realtors® (FAR) and conducted by the National Association of Realtors® (NAR). The number includes commercial properties valued at $5.0 million or more in the office, industrial, retail and multi-family sectors. The study tracks commercial activity by market, including Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Orlando, Tampa and West Palm Beach.

    The study found that transaction volume increased over time due to investor interest and higher prices. Since 2004, demand for commercial real estate in Florida increased steadily, with modest dips in activity in 2006.

    The office sector

    The demand for office space in Florida improved significantly starting in 2004. Increased demand coupled with a slowdown in construction resulted in falling office vacancy rates from midway through the decade. In 2002-2003, vacancy rates in Fort Lauderdale and Orlando approached 20 percent, but are now below the national average. An upswing in new supply will cause vacancy rates to rise later in 2007.

    The industrial market

    Trade with Central America, as well as goods coming into the country from China via the Panama Canal, fueled demand for warehouse and distribution space in Florida, with that demand increasing from both tenants and end users. By the end of 2007, industrial vacancy rates will begin to edge upwards as new build-to-suit facilities leave obsolete buildings vacant.

    The multifamily market

    Florida is the only state market still experiencing an appreciable amount of condo conversion activity. Nationwide, $30 billion of 2005’s $88 billion in multifamily transactions resulted from condo conversions. However, transactions dropped to $9 billion in 2006. Investors now look for income appreciation and improving fundamentals.

    The vacancy rate for multi-family housing will remain in the 5.5 percent to 5.9 percent range for most of 2007, according to NAR’s forecast. For much of 2005 and early 2006, the vacancy rate was at least 1.0 percent lower – but NAR attributes the change to condo conversion projects that reverted back to active rental leasing when the home sales market slowed down, putting additional units on the market.

    The retail market

    In Florida, the retail sector continues to perform better than in the nation as a whole. For example, the retail vacancy rate in Miami at year-end is projected to be just one-third of the nationwide vacancy rate. Nationwide, the retail sector has been hurting more than other commercial sectors.

    Posted by Don Suda on May 3rd, 2007 9:40 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Property tax reform dead – but lawmakers call special session
    May 3rd, 2007 9:39 AM
    Property tax reform dead – but lawmakers call special session

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 2, 2007 – Property tax reform is dead, at least for now. The Florida Senate President and House Speaker said today that talks have broken down and time has run out – but they also announced that a special session to deal with the issue would be held sometime between June 5 and 15. However, three real-estate-related bills passed yesterday and now await approval, or a veto, from Gov. Crist.

    Senate Speaker Ken Pruitt (R-Port St. Lucie) said that House and Senate conferees have come a long way toward compromise, but they just cannot come to terms in the final 36 hours of the session with the necessary reform for Florida’s property owners.

    “While I am disappointed the Legislature didn’t finalize the property tax reform plan during the regular session, the 30 days (until) the June special session allows us even more time to make our voices heard,” says FAR President Nancy Riley. “Your legislator will be home for the next four weeks,” she adds, suggesting that every FAR member use that time to meet with their personal representatives and keep pressuring them for significant property tax reform.
     
    “It is my hope that a special legislative session devoted entirely to this issue will be able to deliver even more comprehensive tax reform than what could be negotiated in the waning hours of the regular session,” Riley says. “The Legislature will be able to roll back rates immediately and, if we remain strong, we will get our special election this year for portability and other constitutional issues that must be ratified by the voters.”

    Other real-estate-related bills moved forward yesterday, however.

    Property managers

    Under HB 1277 by Rep. Pat Patterson (R-DeLand), a landlord may impose additional penalties – to a limit and only if included in the lease agreement – on tenants who break a lease. Under existing law, a landlord’s remedy for a tenant’s early termination is the landlord’s actual damages. Under HB 1277, an “early termination fee” may be imposed on a yearly lease, providing the fee does not add up to more than two months rent, even if the unit does not remain empty for two months after it’s vacated. The House passed HB 1277 yesterday morning on a 101 to 14 vote and sent it to the Senate, where it passed unanimously. It was sent to the governor this afternoon. The bill will take effect immediately if and when the governor signs it into law.

    Mortgage brokers and lenders

    SB 1824 by Sen. Mike Fasano (R-New Port Richey) places numerous disclosure and education requirements on mortgage brokers and lenders to help protect consumers during the mortgage loan application process. If signed by the governor, it takes effect Oct. 1, 2007.

    Title insurance

    HB 111 by Rep. Bill Galvano (R-Bradenton) requires a title insurance agent not based in Florida to fulfill the same licensure and continuing education requirements as a resident title insurance agent. The bill also repeals several provisions of current law dealing with a title agent’s compensation. If signed by the governor, the bill takes effect Oct. 1, 2007.


    Posted by Don Suda on May 3rd, 2007 9:39 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Florida Property Tax Update:
    May 2nd, 2007 10:15 AM
    House turns friendly to slots bill

    Crist signs bill giving hurricane prep tax break

    Gov. Charlie Crist on Monday signed a bill into law making certain hurricane and severe weather preparedness items tax-exempt from June 1 – the first day of hurricane season – through June 12. “The smart thing to do is just be ready for it, go out and make the kind of purchases that make you more safe and your family more safe, and so I appreciate the sponsors’ hard work and the commonsense nature of this kind of legislation,” Crist said. “It is just the right thing to do.” Citizens have a civic duty to prepare for storms by stocking up on supplies and developing emergency plans, said Craig Fugate, director of the state Division of Emergency Management. Help with such planning is available on the agency’s Web site, www.FloridaDisaster.org. The tax-exempt items include radios with “specific area message encoding,” a provision aimed at boosting readiness for tornadoes. The items covered by the tax break include flashlights up to $20, weather radios up to $75, tarps under $50, gas cans or tanks, batteries, cell phone chargers, coolers and generators up to $1,000. This is the third consecutive year for the tax break on hurricane supplies. State economists have estimated the bill would cost the state about $20 million in lost revenue.

    Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press, Bill Kaczor. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Associated Press writer David Royse contributed to this report.

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – May 1, 2007 – Offering an apparent olive branch to the state Senate on property taxes, the House signaled Monday it is ready to loosen its anti-gambling stance and let nine parimutels around the state offer slot machines – as long as the money goes to reduce property taxes.

    The House Environment and Natural Resources Council voted 13-1 to allow some of the state’s horse and dog tracks and jai-alai frontons, including three in Miami-Dade, to offer so-called video lottery terminals.

    The terminals, also called Class II machines, are identical to casino-style slots, but produce lower payouts because players in essence bet against one another and not the house.

    The estimated $1 billion raised from those nine facilities would be sent to school districts across the state, which would have to use the money to reduce property taxes now levied to pay for schools.

    If the plan is approved, taxpayers could see savings of about 10 to 20 percent on the schools’ portion of their property tax bill.

    “It’s a tax cut,” said the council’s chairman, Rep. Stan Mayfield, a Vero Beach Republican. He offered no explanation for why the bill appeared out of nowhere in the last days of the session or why a gambling bill was sent to his council as its only stop before it is voted on by the full House.

    The bill serves as more than a tax cut: It shows the Senate that the House is willing to push through the gambling expansion bill that is important to Senate leaders, with the hope that the Senate will in turn pass a bill very important to House Speaker Marco Rubio and his leadership team: a bill to help build a new stadium for the Florida Marlins baseball team.

    The Senate passed its gambling bill last week. It would allow all 25 parimutuels in the state to expand to Class II slots. That plan would generate up to $1.9 billion in new revenue, according to Senate estimates.

    The House plan is more targeted. It limits the new slots games to parimutuels in counties with populations of more than 800,000, or within 40 miles of an existing casino operated by an Indian tribe. The bill prohibits Broward County parimutuels from offering the machines, unless they give up the Vegas-style Class III gaming devices they now use.

    The bill’s sponsor, Rep. David Rivera, said the measure is necessary to help parimutuels compete with the Indian tribes, such as the Seminoles’ Hard Rock Casino in Hollywood.

    “This is consistent with the theme of competition,” Rivera said. “It’s also a bill about property-tax relief.”

    A couple of committee members complained that the issue was rushed through.

    “I just found out about this,” said Rep. Rich Glorioso, a Plant City Republican. “I don’t like this bill but I’m going to let it go to the floor because I believe anything this large and of this magnitude needs to be [decided] by the entire chamber.”

    Mayfield said the bill is likely to be refined and changed before it comes to a vote before the full House, and added, “I’m not even sure it’s going to make it that far.”


    Posted by Don Suda on May 2nd, 2007 10:15 AMPost a Comment (0)

    Recent Posts:

    Archive: